| Literature DB >> 32752231 |
Mokhalad Alghrairi1,2, Nasri Sulaiman1, Saad Mutashar3.
Abstract
In-stent restenosis concerning the coronary artery refers to the blood clotting-caused re-narrowing of the blocked section of the artery, which is opened using a stent. The failure rate for stents is in the range of 10% to 15%, where they do not remain open, thereby leading to about 40% of the patients with stent implantations requiring repeat procedure within one year, despite increased risk factors and the administration of expensive medicines. Hence, today stent restenosis is a significant cause of deaths globally. Monitoring and treatment matter a lot when it comes to early diagnosis and treatment. A review of the present stent monitoring technology as well as the practical treatment for addressing stent restenosis was conducted. The problems and challenges associated with current stent monitoring technology were illustrated, along with its typical applications. Brief suggestions were given and the progress of stent implants was discussed. It was revealed that prime requisites are needed to achieve good quality implanted stent devices in terms of their size, reliability, etc. This review would positively prompt researchers to augment their efforts towards the expansion of healthcare systems. Lastly, the challenges and concerns associated with nurturing a healthcare system were deliberated with meaningful evaluations.Entities:
Keywords: X-ray; computed tomography angiography (CTA); coronary artery disease (CAD); drug-eluting stent (DES); hyperthermia; in-stent restenosis; radio frequency (RF) resonant heating; temperature regulation; wireless pressure sensor
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32752231 PMCID: PMC7435700 DOI: 10.3390/s20154303
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1(A) Procedure of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary angioplasty. Reproduced with permission [6], Wiley’s Open Access; (B) elastic recoil and negative remodeling contribute to stenosis. Reproduced with permission [7], Wiley’s Open Access.
Figure 2Wireless pressure sensor in micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS) device: (A) Optical images of polymer stents integrated with wireless pressure sensors; (B) actual photo images; (C) optical image of bare metal stent integrated with the wireless pressure sensor. Reproduced with permission [32], Sensors Open Access; (D) fabricated poly(D-lactide) (PDLA)-based wireless pressure sensors. Reproduced with permission [35], copyright 2020, Elsevier; (E) scheme showing the inductive coupling across the biological tissue. Reproduced with permission [36], Sensors Open Access; (F) fabricated wireless pressure sensor with SEM cross sectional view of the wireless pressure sensor fabricated using a SU-8 thermal pressure bonding technique. Reproduced with permission [34], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Figure 3The pressure sensor using a stent as an antenna integrated with MEMS capacitive: (A) Completed active stent device with the stent terminal on which the interconnect wire was bonded. Reproduced with permission [44], copyright 2020, IEEE; (B) fabricated LC-tank stent devices integrated with capacitive pressure sensors and a device coated with Parylene C; (C) conceptual diagram of wireless sensing of vascular conditions through the sensor-integrated smart stent. Reproduced with permission [41], copyright 2020, Springer Nature.
This is a table show the performance of pressure sensor.
| References | Coil Shape | Capacitance | Inductance | Distance Reading | Material of Sensor | Material of Stent | Dimension of Sensor | Frequency | Resolution | Sensitivity | Pressure Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | planar | (2.0–2.35) pF | 1.2 µH | - | Glass, Gold, silicon | - | 2.6 mm × 1.6 mm | 95–103 MHz | - | 120 KHz/mmHg | (0–50) mmHg |
| [ | planar | ˂1 pF | 3.7 µH | >3 cm | Polyimide, Gold, Glass, silicon | - | 6 mm × 6 mm × 0.5 mm | 12 MHz | - | 3.2 KHz/mmHg | (400–1000) mmHg |
| [ | planar | 10 pF | 3.5 µH | 1 cm | Parylene-C, glass, silicon | - | 2 mm3 | - | 3 mmHg | 10 fF/mmHg | - |
| [ | Circular | - | - | ≥20 cm | PTFE/FEP | - | Diameter 4 mm | - | - | −1 to −20 KHz/mmHg | - |
| [ | Stent | 17 pF | 20 nH | - | Silicon, glass, Au | Stainless steel | (1.2 × 1.4 × 0.5) mm3 | 201 MHz | - | 5.0 fF/Torr | - |
| [ | Stent | - | - | 10 cm | - | - | 1 mm2 and thickness 300 µm | 2.4 GHz | - | - | - |
| [ | Stent | - | - | 10 cm | - | Stainless steel | 5 mm × 5 mm | 2.4 GHz | - | - | - |
| [ | Planar | - | 7.62 µH | - | Silicon | - | 6 × 6 × 1 mm3 | 20 MHz | - | 40.27 KHz | 0–350 mmHg |
| [ | Stent | 5.32 pF | 3.37 nH | >10 cm | Gold-tin | - | 3 mm × 6 mm and thickness 300 µm | 2.4 GHz | 0.5 mmHg | 6.64 fF/mmHg | 0–50 mmHg |
| [ | Circular | - | 1.9 µH | 3 mm | Zinc, polymer | - | Diameter 10 mm | 50 MHz | - | 39 KHz/KPa | 0–20 KPa |
| [ | Planar | - | - | 15 mm | Polyamide, Cu | - | 1 × 1 × 0.1 mm3 | 2777 MHz | 0.3 mmHg | 2.254 MHz/mmHg | 0–500 mmHg |
| [ | Stent | - | 530 nH | - | Stainless steel, parylene C | Stainless steel, gold | 1.5 mm × 1.5 mm × 200 µm | 50 MHz | - | 146 ppm/mmHg | 0–250 mmHg |
| [ | Planar | - | 839 nH | - | SU-8 polymer, silicon, Cu, gold | Polymer, (Co-Cr) | (3.13 mm × 3.16 mm × 200 µm) | 200 MHz | - | 0.043 MHz/mmHg | 0–230 mmHg |
| [ | Planar | - | - | - | SU-8 polymer, Ti, Au | Polycaprolactone PCL | 4 mm × 4 mm | 183 MHz | - | 160 KHz/mmHg | 0–220 mmHg |
| [ | Stent | - | 268 nH | - | Titanium, SiO2, stainless steel 316 L, Au | Stainless steel 316 L, Au, parylene C | (1.5 mm × 1.5 mm × 200 µm) | 10 MHz | 12.4 mmHg | - | - |
| [ | Planar | 23.18 pF | 1230 nH | - | SU-8 polymer, Au, Cu, SiO2 | Polycaprolactone PCL | 4 mm × 4 mm × 0.15 mm | 183 MHz | - | 160 KHz/mmHg | 0–220 mmHg |
Figure 4Computed tomographic (CT) angiography: (A) Left anterior oblique view of 3D volume rendered image showing the position of the proximal LAD stent; (B) Axial MIP image showing the position of proximal LAD stent; (C) Sagittal curved planar reformatted image showing patent proximal LAD stent; (D) Coronal curved planar reformatted image showing patent dominant LCx and PLB. Reproduced with permission [46], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Figure 5X-ray-based pressure-sensing technology for monitoring restenosis non-invasively. Reproduced with permission [81], copyright 2020, IEEE.
Figure 6Hyperthermia treatment: (A) Conceptual diagram of the stent-based endohyperthermia system using the resonant-heating stent powered and operated using the external RF antenna unit with independent booster antennas. Reproduced with permission [96], copyright 2020, IEEE; (B) schematic of the proposed wireless micro heater. Reproduced with permission [97], copyright 2020, IEEE; (C) conceptual illustration of the stent-based wireless endohyperthermia for in-stent restenosis treatment. Reproduced with permission [98], copyright 2020, IEEE.
This is a table show the design performance for hyperthermia treatment was done by researcher. Reproduced with permission [96], Copyright 2020, IEEE.
| Ref. | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stent length | 38 | 15 | 23 | 20 | 20 | 20.2 |
| Powering method | Inductive | Inductive | resonant | resonant | resonant | resonant |
| Input power (dBm) | 70 | 70 | 25 | 33 | 23 | 44.7 |
| Transmission medium | Subdermal tissue | Bioartificial vessel, water | Air | Meat tissue | Saline | Air |
| Transmission distance (mm) | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5–15 | - | 0 |
| Power transfer efficiency % | ≥0.03 | 0.52 | 0.09 | 40.8–6.8 | 17 | - |
| Heating efficiency (°C/W) | ≥0.0005 | 0.13 | 4.1 | 15.5–3.2 | 17.1 | 1.25 |