Literature DB >> 16636491

Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: comparison with conventional invasive angiography.

Mariko Ehara1, Jean-Francois Surmely, Masato Kawai, Osamu Katoh, Tetsuo Matsubara, Mitsuyasu Terashima, Etsuo Tsuchikane, Yoshihisa Kinoshita, Tomomichi Suzuki, Tatsuya Ito, Yoshihiro Takeda, Kenya Nasu, Nobuyoshi Tanaka, Akira Murata, Yasuyuki Suzuki, Koyo Sato, Takahiko Suzuki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) is a promising noninvasive method of detecting coronary artery disease (CAD). However, most data have been obtained in selected series of patients. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the accuracy of 64-slice MSCT (64 MSCT) in daily practice, without any patient selection. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Using 64-slice MSCT coronary angiography (CTA), 69 consecutive patients, 39 (57%) of whom had previously undergone stent implantation, were evaluated. The mean heart rate during scan was 72 beats/min, scan time 13.6 s and the amount of contrast media 72 mL. The mean time span between invasive coronary angiography (ICAG) and CTA was 6 days. Significant stenosis was defined as a diameter reduction of > 50%. Of 966 segments, 884 (92%) were assessable. Compared with ICAG, the sensitivity of CTA to diagnose significant stenosis was 90%, specificity 94%, positive predictive value (PPV) 89% and negative predictive value (NPV) 95%. With regard to 58 stented lesions, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 93%, 96%, 87% and 98%, respectively. On the patient-based analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of CTA to detect CAD were 98%, 86%, 98% and 86%, respectively. Eighty-two (8%) segments were not assessable because of irregular rhythm, calcification or tachycardia.
CONCLUSION: Sixty-four-MSCT has a high accuracy for the detection of significant CAD in an unselected patient population and therefore can be considered as a valuable noninvasive technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16636491     DOI: 10.1253/circj.70.564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ J        ISSN: 1346-9843            Impact factor:   2.993


  52 in total

1.  Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent restenosis with prospectively ECG-triggered axial CT angiography versus retrospective technique: a phantom study.

Authors:  W-J Yang; Z-L Pan; H Zhang; L-F Pang; Y Guo; K-M Chen
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis classified by computed tomography in patients with drug-eluting stents: correlation with invasive coronary angiography.

Authors:  Jingwei Pan; Zhigang Lu; Jiayin Zhang; Minghua Li; Meng Wei
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-08       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Comparative analysis between 64- and 320-slice spiral computed tomography in the display of coronary artery stents and diagnosis of in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Junyan Yue; Jie Chen; Wenguang Dou; Ying Hu; Qiang Li; Fengmei Zhou; Hongkai Cui; Qingwu Wu; Ruimin Yang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 4.  A practical guide to reading CT coronary angiograms--how to avoid mistakes when assessing for coronary stenoses.

Authors:  John W M Hoe; Kok Hong Toh
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Cardiac CT: coronary arteries and beyond.

Authors:  Andreas H Mahnken; Georg Mühlenbruch; Rolf W Günther; Joachim E Wildberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Comprehensive cardiac CT study: evaluation of coronary arteries, left ventricular function, and myocardial perfusion--is it possible?

Authors:  Ricardo C Cury; Koen Nieman; Michael D Shapiro; Khurram Nasir; Roberto C Cury; Thomas J Brady
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Influence of intra-coronary enhancement on diagnostic accuracy with 64-slice CT coronary angiography.

Authors:  Filippo Cademartiri; Erica Maffei; Anselmo Alessandro Palumbo; Roberto Malagò; Ludovico La Grutta; W Bob Meiijboom; Annachiara Aldrovandi; Michele Fusaro; Luigi Vignali; Alberto Menozzi; Valerio Brambilla; Paolo Coruzzi; Massimo Midiri; Miles A Kirchin; Nico R A Mollet; Gabriel P Krestin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Current and upcoming roles of CT and MRI in clinical cardiac imagery.

Authors:  Scott Beach; Mushabbar A Syed
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  ACCF/AHA/ACP 2009 competence and training statement: a curriculum on prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Competence and Training (Writing Committee to Develop a Competence and Training Statement on Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease): developed in collaboration with the American Academy of Neurology; American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; American College of Preventive Medicine; American College of Sports Medicine; American Diabetes Association; American Society of Hypertension; Association of Black Cardiologists; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National Lipid Association; and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association.

Authors:  C Noel Bairey Merz; Mark J Alberts; Gary J Balady; Christie M Ballantyne; Kathy Berra; Henry R Black; Roger S Blumenthal; Michael H Davidson; Sara B Fazio; Keith C Ferdinand; Lawrence J Fine; Vivian Fonseca; Barry A Franklin; Patrick E McBride; George A Mensah; Geno J Merli; Patrick T O'Gara; Paul D Thompson; James A Underberg
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Accuracy of quantitative coronary angiography with computed tomography and its dependency on plaque composition: plaque composition and accuracy of cardiac CT.

Authors:  Lars Husmann; Oliver Gaemperli; Tiziano Schepis; Hans Scheffel; Ines Valenta; Tobias Hoefflinghaus; Paul Stolzmann; Lotus Desbiolles; Bernhard A Herzog; Sebastian Leschka; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.