Literature DB >> 16226187

Diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis with multidetector row spiral computed tomography.

Tamar Gaspar1, David A Halon, Basil S Lewis, Salim Adawi, Jorge E Schliamser, Ronen Rubinshtein, Moshe Y Flugelman, Nathan Peled.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of a new generation spiral multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scanner (Brilliance 40, Philips Medical Systems, Cleveland, Ohio) in the diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR).
BACKGROUND: Noninvasive imaging of ISR would be clinically useful, but artifacts caused by metallic stent struts have limited the role of early generation MDCT scanners.
METHODS: We examined 65 patients (age 63 +/- 12 years, 48 [73.8%] men) with 111 implanted coronary stents who were referred for repeat invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Patients underwent 40-slice MDCT one to three days before scheduled ICA, using intravenous contrast enhancement. Images were reconstructed in multiple formats using retrospective electrocardiographic gating. Stents were viewed in their long and short axes and luminal contrast attenuation graded from MDCT grade 1 (minimal restenosis) to 4 (severe restenosis) by consensus of two observers.
RESULTS: In-stent restenosis (>/=60% luminal narrowing by quantitative coronary angiography) was found on ICA in 18 (16.2%) of the stented segments and in 16 (24.6%) patients. The MDCT findings correlated with ICA restenosis, with restenosis in only 1 of 59 (1.6%) MDCT grade 1 segments, but in more than three-quarters (12 of 15, 80%) of MDCT grade 4 segments (sensitivity 72.2%, specificity 92.5%, positive predictive value [PPV] 65.0%, negative predictive value [NPV] 94.5% [five stents not assessable by MDCT considered as restenosis]). Using MDCT grades 3 or 4 combined for restenosis, sensitivity of MDCT was 88.9%, specificity 80.6%, PPV 47.1%, and NPV 97.4%.
CONCLUSIONS: In-stent restenosis can be diagnosed with moderate sensitivity using a new generation 40-slice MDCT scanner. The high NPV implies a significant role for MDCT in excluding ISR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16226187     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  29 in total

1.  Comparative analysis between 64- and 320-slice spiral computed tomography in the display of coronary artery stents and diagnosis of in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Junyan Yue; Jie Chen; Wenguang Dou; Ying Hu; Qiang Li; Fengmei Zhou; Hongkai Cui; Qingwu Wu; Ruimin Yang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Effect of contrast concentration, tube potential and reconstruction kernels on MDCT evaluation of coronary stents: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Gopi Kiran Reddy Sirineni; Mannudeep K Kalra; Krishna Pottala; Sandra Waldrop; Mushabbar Syed; Stefan Tigges
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Six-months patency of three long drug eluting stents documented by surveillance coronary multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT).

Authors:  M Reza Movahed
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Evaluation of in-stent restenosis in proximal coronary arteries with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).

Authors:  V Chabbert; D Carrie; M Bennaceur; E Maupas; V Lauwers; M Mhem; T Lhermusier; M Elbaz; F Joffre; H Rousseau; J Puel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Cardiac CT: coronary arteries and beyond.

Authors:  Andreas H Mahnken; Georg Mühlenbruch; Rolf W Günther; Joachim E Wildberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Comprehensive cardiac CT study: evaluation of coronary arteries, left ventricular function, and myocardial perfusion--is it possible?

Authors:  Ricardo C Cury; Koen Nieman; Michael D Shapiro; Khurram Nasir; Roberto C Cury; Thomas J Brady
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Coronary artery stent geometry and in-stent contrast attenuation with 64-slice computed tomography.

Authors:  Tiziano Schepis; Pascal Koepfli; Sebastian Leschka; Lotus Desbiolles; Lars Husmann; Oliver Gaemperli; Franz R Eberli; Simon Wildermuth; Borut Marincek; Thomas F Lüscher; Hatem Alkadhi; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  64 Slice multi-detector row cardiac CT.

Authors:  Harpreet K Pannu; Pamela T Johnson; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2008-10-22

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent coronary restenosis detection with multislice spiral computed tomography: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michèle Hamon; Laure Champ-Rigot; Rémy Morello; John W Riddell; Martial Hamon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Coronary CT angiography using 64 detector rows: methods and design of the multi-centre trial CORE-64.

Authors:  Julie M Miller; Marc Dewey; Andrea L Vavere; Carlos E Rochitte; Hiroyuki Niinuma; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Narinder Paul; John Hoe; Albert de Roos; Kunihiro Yoshioka; Pedro A Lemos; David E Bush; Albert C Lardo; John Texter; Jeffery Brinker; Christopher Cox; Melvin E Clouse; João A C Lima
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.