Literature DB >> 17929024

Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery stent patency with retrospectively ECG-gated 64-slice CT angiography.

Iacopo Carbone1, Marco Francone, Emanuela Algeri, Antonino Granatelli, Alessandro Napoli, Miles A Kirchin, Carlo Catalano, Roberto Passariello.   

Abstract

The aim of our study has been to evaluate the ability of 64-slice computed tomographic angiography (CTA) to assess coronary artery stent patency, relative to selective coronary angiography (SCA). Fifty-five consecutive patients (age range 45-80 years) with 97 previously implanted coronary artery stents underwent 64-slice CTA. The 55 patients comprised 40 subjects (group A) who were referred for follow-up SCA at a mean interval of 9.6 months after stent positioning, and 15 subjects (group B) in whom SCA was clinically indicated. Stent evaluation was performed independently by two blinded readers in terms of image quality and presence of in-stent restenosis (ISR; lumen obstruction of >or=50%). SCA was performed in 41/55 patients; 14 patients refused to undergo SCA after the 64-slice CTA exam. A total of 88 stents in 74 segments were analyzed. Twenty-one of the 74 stented segments were of poor image quality and were not considered for further analysis. Sixty-four-slice CTA detected 12/16 ISR (sensitivity: 75%) and ruled out ISR in 32/37 cases (specificity: 86%). Sixty-four-slice CTA is a valuable modality for follow-up of coronary artery stent patency only in selected patients. Appropriate candidates for follow-up 64-slice CTA should be established based on stent diameter, stent material and type as well as HR and heart rhythm. However, given the number of non-assessable segments, further work would appear necessary before 64-slice CTA can be considered a suitable procedure for broad clinical application in the evaluation of coronary artery stent patency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17929024     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0756-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  46 in total

Review 1.  Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart.

Authors:  Richard L Morin; Thomas C Gerber; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: comparison with conventional invasive angiography.

Authors:  Mariko Ehara; Jean-Francois Surmely; Masato Kawai; Osamu Katoh; Tetsuo Matsubara; Mitsuyasu Terashima; Etsuo Tsuchikane; Yoshihisa Kinoshita; Tomomichi Suzuki; Tatsuya Ito; Yoshihiro Takeda; Kenya Nasu; Nobuyoshi Tanaka; Akira Murata; Yasuyuki Suzuki; Koyo Sato; Takahiko Suzuki
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.993

3.  Assessment of coronary artery stents using 16-slice MDCT angiography: evaluation of a dedicated reconstruction kernel and a noise reduction filter.

Authors:  Harald Seifarth; Rainer Raupach; Stefan Schaller; Eva Maria Fallenberg; Thomas Flohr; Walter Heindel; Roman Fischbach; David Maintz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-12       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience.

Authors:  Thorsten R C Johnson; Konstantin Nikolaou; Bernd J Wintersperger; Alexander W Leber; Franz von Ziegler; Carsten Rist; Sonja Buhmann; Andreas Knez; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Assessment of coronary artery stent patency and restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography.

Authors:  Carsten Rist; Franz von Ziegler; Konstantin Nikolaou; Miles A Kirchin; Bernd J Wintersperger; Thorsten R Johnson; Andreas Knez; Alexander W Leber; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 6.  Multidetector CT for visualization of coronary stents.

Authors:  Francesca Pugliese; Filippo Cademartiri; Carlos van Mieghem; Willem B Meijboom; Patrizia Malagutti; Nico R A Mollet; Carlo Martinoli; Pim J de Feyter; Gabriel P Krestin
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis: determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography--initial experience.

Authors:  Dilek Oncel; Guray Oncel; Mustafa Karaca
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector-row CT for detection of in-stent restenosis vs detection of stenosis in nonstented coronary arteries.

Authors:  Joelle M Kefer; Emmanuel Coche; Jean-Louis J Vanoverschelde; Bernhard L Gerber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Complications of diagnostic cardiac catheterisation: results from 34,041 patients in the United Kingdom confidential enquiry into cardiac catheter complications. The Joint Audit Committee of the British Cardiac Society and Royal College of Physicians of London.

Authors:  D de Bono
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1993-09

10.  Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography.

Authors:  Joanne D Schuijf; Jeroen J Bax; J Wouter Jukema; Hildo J Lamb; Hazem M A Warda; Hubert W Vliegen; Albert de Roos; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent restenosis with prospectively ECG-triggered axial CT angiography versus retrospective technique: a phantom study.

Authors:  W-J Yang; Z-L Pan; H Zhang; L-F Pang; Y Guo; K-M Chen
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Impact of an advanced image-based monoenergetic reconstruction algorithm on coronary stent visualization using third generation dual-source dual-energy CT: a phantom study.

Authors:  Stefanie Mangold; Paola M Cannaó; U Joseph Schoepf; Julian L Wichmann; Christian Canstein; Stephen R Fuller; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Akos Varga-Szemes; Konstantin Nikolaou; Carlo N De Cecco
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Transitioning from 16-slice to 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: are we really making progress?

Authors:  Razi Khan; Sapna Rawal; Mark J Eisenberg
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.223

4.  CT vs SPECT: CT is the first-line test for the diagnosis and prognosis of stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Ahmed Aljizeeri; Myra S Cocker; Benjamin J W Chow
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  A noise-optimized virtual monochromatic reconstruction algorithm improves stent visualization and diagnostic accuracy for detection of in-stent re-stenosis in lower extremity run-off CT angiography.

Authors:  Stefanie Mangold; Carlo N De Cecco; U Joseph Schoepf; Ricardo T Yamada; Akos Varga-Szemes; Andrew C Stubenrauch; Damiano Caruso; Stephen R Fuller; Thomas J Vogl; Konstantin Nikolaou; Thomas M Todoran; Julian L Wichmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Cardiac CT: atherosclerosis to acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Ravi Kiran Munnur; James D Cameron; Brian S Ko; Ian T Meredith; Dennis T L Wong
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-12

7.  Prognostic value of dual-source multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stent implantation.

Authors:  Hamza Sunman; Hikmet Yorgun; Uğur Canpolat; Ayşegül Ülgen Kunak; Muhammet Dural; Tuncay Hazırolan; Levent Sahiner; Ergün Barış Kaya; Kudret Aytemir; Lale Tokgözoğlu; Giray Kabakçı; Ali Oto
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  CT Imaging of Coronary Stents: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Andreas H Mahnken
Journal:  ISRN Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-11

9.  Coronary computed tomography angiography equals invasive angiography for the prediction of coronary revascularization.

Authors:  Mariusz Dębski; Mariusz Kruk; Sebastian Bujak; Zofia Dzielińska; Marcin Demkow; Cezary Kępka
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2019-05-05       Impact factor: 1.426

10.  Coronary artery stent evaluation using a vascular model at 64-detector row CT: comparison between prospective and retrospective ECG-gated axial scans.

Authors:  Shigeru Suzuki; Shigeru Furui; Sadatoshi Kuwahara; Dhruv Mehta; Tatsuro Kaminaga; Akiyoshi Miyazawa; Yasunari Ueno; Kumiko Konno
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.