Literature DB >> 27367971

Parallax error in long-axial field-of-view PET scanners-a simulation study.

Jeffrey P Schmall1, Joel S Karp, Matt Werner, Suleman Surti.   

Abstract

There is a growing interest in the design and construction of a PET scanner with a very long axial extent. One critical design challenge is the impact of the long axial extent on the scanner spatial resolution properties. In this work, we characterize the effect of parallax error in PET system designs having an axial field-of-view (FOV) of 198 cm (total-body PET scanner) using fully-3D Monte Carlo simulations. Two different scintillation materials were studied: LSO and LaBr3. The crystal size in both cases was 4  ×  4  ×  20 mm3. Several different depth-of-interaction (DOI) encoding techniques were investigated to characterize the improvement in spatial resolution when using a DOI capable detector. To measure spatial resolution we simulated point sources in a warm background in the center of the imaging FOV, where the effects of axial parallax are largest, and at several positions radially offset from the center. Using a line-of-response based ordered-subset expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm we found that the axial resolution in an LSO scanner degrades from 4.8 mm to 5.7 mm (full width at half max) at the center of the imaging FOV when extending the axial acceptance angle (α) from  ±12° (corresponding to an axial FOV of 18 cm) to the maximum of  ±67°-a similar result was obtained with LaBr3, in which the axial resolution degraded from 5.3 mm to 6.1 mm. For comparison we also measured the degradation due to radial parallax error in the transverse imaging FOV; the transverse resolution, averaging radial and tangential directions, of an LSO scanner was degraded from 4.9 mm to 7.7 mm, for a measurement at the center of the scanner compared to a measurement with a radial offset of 23 cm. Simulations of a DOI detector design improved the spatial resolution in all dimensions. The axial resolution in the LSO-based scanner, with α  =  ± 67°, was improved from 5.7 mm to 5.0 mm by incorporating a two-layer DOI detector. These results characterize the maximum axial blurring for a fully open 2 m long PET scanner and demonstrate that large sensitivity gains are possible with a modest reduction in resolution when using current clinical detector technology with no DOI capability.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27367971      PMCID: PMC5203974          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/14/5443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  23 in total

1.  Image quality assessment of LaBr3-based whole-body 3D PET scanners: a Monte Carlo evaluation.

Authors:  S Surti; J S Karp; G Muehllehner
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  The 2006 Henry N. Wagner Lecture: Of mice and men (and positrons)--advances in PET imaging technology.

Authors:  Simon R Cherry
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Development and evaluation of a LOR-based image reconstruction with 3D system response modeling for a PET insert with dual-layer offset crystal design.

Authors:  Xuezhu Zhang; Greg Stortz; Vesna Sossi; Christopher J Thompson; Fabrice Retière; Piotr Kozlowski; Jonathan D Thiessen; Andrew L Goertzen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  DOI Determination by Rise Time Discrimination in Single-Ended Readout for TOF PET Imaging.

Authors:  R I Wiener; S Surti; J S Karp
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.679

5.  Side readout of long scintillation crystal elements with digital SiPM for TOF-DOI PET.

Authors:  Jung Yeol Yeom; Ruud Vinke; Craig S Levin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Ultra staging to unmask the prescribing of adjuvant therapy in cancer patients: the future opportunity to image micrometastases using total-body 18F-FDG PET scanning.

Authors:  Patricia M Price; Ramsey D Badawi; Simon R Cherry; Terry Jones
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Impact of detector design on imaging performance of a long axial field-of-view, whole-body PET scanner.

Authors:  S Surti; J S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Update on time-of-flight PET imaging.

Authors:  Suleman Surti
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Optimal whole-body PET scanner configurations for different volumes of LSO scintillator: a simulation study.

Authors:  Jonathan K Poon; Magnus L Dahlbom; William W Moses; Karthik Balakrishnan; Wenli Wang; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  The imaging performance of a LaBr3-based PET scanner.

Authors:  M E Daube-Witherspoon; S Surti; A Perkins; C C M Kyba; R Wiener; M E Werner; R Kulp; J S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  12 in total

1.  Performance Evaluation of a Newly Developed MR-Compatible Mobile PET Scanner with Two Detector Layouts.

Authors:  Masao Watanabe; Yuji Nakamoto; Ryusuke Nakamoto; Takayoshi Ishimori; Tsuneo Saga; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 2.  Innovations in Instrumentation for Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Eric Berg; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.446

3.  Towards time-of-flight PET with a semiconductor detector.

Authors:  Gerard Ariño-Estrada; Gregory S Mitchell; Sun Il Kwon; Junwei Du; Hadong Kim; Leonard J Cirignano; Kanai S Shah; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Development and Evaluation of mini-EXPLORER: A Long Axial Field-of-View PET Scanner for Nonhuman Primate Imaging.

Authors:  Eric Berg; Xuezhu Zhang; Julien Bec; Martin S Judenhofer; Brijesh Patel; Qiyu Peng; Maciej Kapusta; Matthias Schmand; Michael E Casey; Alice F Tarantal; Jinyi Qi; Ramsey D Badawi; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  Total-Body PET: Maximizing Sensitivity to Create New Opportunities for Clinical Research and Patient Care.

Authors:  Simon R Cherry; Terry Jones; Joel S Karp; Jinyi Qi; William W Moses; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  Scanner Design Considerations for Long Axial Field-of-View PET Systems.

Authors:  Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2020-11-05

Review 7.  3D/4D Reconstruction and Quantitative Total Body Imaging.

Authors:  Jinyi Qi; Samuel Matej; Guobao Wang; Xuezhu Zhang
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2021-01

8.  An encoder-decoder network for direct image reconstruction on sinograms of a long axial field of view PET.

Authors:  Ruiyao Ma; Jiaxi Hu; Hasan Sari; Song Xue; Clemens Mingels; Marco Viscione; Venkata Sai Sundar Kandarpa; Wei Bo Li; Dimitris Visvikis; Rui Qiu; Axel Rominger; Junli Li; Kuangyu Shi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Impact of event positioning algorithm on performance of a whole-body PET scanner using one-to-one coupled detectors.

Authors:  S Surti; J S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Performance Characteristics of Long Axial Field-of-View PET Scanners with Axial Gaps.

Authors:  Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Varsha Viswanath; Matthew E Werner; Joel S Karp
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.