Literature DB >> 34179595

Performance Characteristics of Long Axial Field-of-View PET Scanners with Axial Gaps.

Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon1, Varsha Viswanath1, Matthew E Werner1, Joel S Karp1.   

Abstract

The introduction of long (>60 cm) axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET systems has shown their potential for clinical and research applications. LAFOV scanners are expensive, so there is interest in designing systems with longer axial coverage while mitigating cost by introducing detector gaps. We used measurements on the PennPET Explorer (64-cm AFOV prototype) and simulations of scanners up to 143-cm long to assess scanner performance with axial gaps introduced by varying the number of detector rows in each ring. Removing detectors reduces the total sensitivity and results in a non-uniform axial noise profile. Axial resolution shows small (<0.5 mm) loss from the edge of the AFOV to the center, even for a 143-cm AFOV scanner with an unrestricted acceptance angle. The presence of large axial gaps increases the variability in axial resolution and contrast recovery across the AFOV compared to a system without gaps. More modest axial gaps show less variable behavior. The results suggest that designs where the gap is no larger than one-half of the width of a detector ring may be preferred, although the optimal choice of scanner design with the trade-offs of performance and AFOV will depend on its intended usage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Long axial field of view PET; PET scanner design; PennPET Explorer

Year:  2020        PMID: 34179595      PMCID: PMC8224406          DOI: 10.1109/trpms.2020.3027257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci        ISSN: 2469-7303


  20 in total

1.  Why is TOF PET reconstruction a more robust method in the presence of inconsistent data?

Authors:  Maurizio Conti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT.

Authors:  S Jan; G Santin; D Strul; S Staelens; K Assié; D Autret; S Avner; R Barbier; M Bardiès; P M Bloomfield; D Brasse; V Breton; P Bruyndonckx; I Buvat; A F Chatziioannou; Y Choi; Y H Chung; C Comtat; D Donnarieix; L Ferrer; S J Glick; C J Groiselle; D Guez; P F Honore; S Kerhoas-Cavata; A S Kirov; V Kohli; M Koole; M Krieguer; D J van der Laan; F Lamare; G Largeron; C Lartizien; D Lazaro; M C Maas; L Maigne; F Mayet; F Melot; C Merheb; E Pennacchio; J Perez; U Pietrzyk; F R Rannou; M Rey; D R Schaart; C R Schmidtlein; L Simon; T Y Song; J M Vieira; D Visvikis; R Van de Walle; E Wieërs; C Morel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Physical performance of a long axial field-of-view PET scanner prototype with sparse rings configuration: A Monte Carlo simulation study.

Authors:  Sara A Zein; Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Mohammad Issa; Amin A Haj-Ali; Sadek A Nehmeh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Development of a small prototype for a proof-of-concept of OpenPET imaging.

Authors:  Taiga Yamaya; Eiji Yoshida; Taku Inaniwa; Shinji Sato; Yasunori Nakajima; Hidekatsu Wakizaka; Daisuke Kokuryo; Atsushi Tsuji; Takayuki Mitsuhashi; Hideyuki Kawai; Hideaki Tashima; Fumihiko Nishikido; Naoko Inadama; Hideo Murayama; Hideaki Haneishi; Mikio Suga; Shoko Kinouchi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Performance Evaluation of the Vereos PET/CT System According to the NEMA NU2-2012 Standard.

Authors:  Ivo Rausch; Agustin Ruiz; Itziar Valverde-Pascual; Jacobo Cal-González; Thomas Beyer; Ignasi Carrio
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  First Human Imaging Studies with the EXPLORER Total-Body PET Scanner.

Authors:  Ramsey D Badawi; Hongcheng Shi; Pengcheng Hu; Shuguang Chen; Tianyi Xu; Patricia M Price; Yu Ding; Benjamin A Spencer; Lorenzo Nardo; Weiping Liu; Jun Bao; Terry Jones; Hongdi Li; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Total Body PET: Why, How, What for?

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Austin R Pantel; Joel S Karp
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-03

Review 8.  Total-Body PET: Maximizing Sensitivity to Create New Opportunities for Clinical Research and Patient Care.

Authors:  Simon R Cherry; Terry Jones; Joel S Karp; Jinyi Qi; William W Moses; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Analytic TOF PET reconstruction algorithm within DIRECT data partitioning framework.

Authors:  Samuel Matej; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  PennPET Explorer: Human Imaging on a Whole-Body Imager.

Authors:  Austin R Pantel; Varsha Viswanath; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Jacob G Dubroff; Gerd Muehllehner; Michael J Parma; Daniel A Pryma; Erin K Schubert; David A Mankoff; Joel S Karp
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 11.082

View more
  1 in total

1.  The potential of a medium-cost long axial FOV PET system for nuclear medicine departments.

Authors:  Stefaan Vandenberghe; Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Maya Abi Akl; Jens Maebe; Suleman Surti; Rudi A Dierckx; Daniel A Pryma; Sadek A Nehmeh; Othmane Bouhali; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 10.057

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.