Literature DB >> 29411709

Impact of event positioning algorithm on performance of a whole-body PET scanner using one-to-one coupled detectors.

S Surti1, J S Karp.   

Abstract

The advent of silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) has introduced the possibility of increased detector performance in commercial whole-body PET scanners. The primary advantage of these photodetectors is the ability to couple a single SiPM channel directly to a single pixel of PET scintillator that is typically 4 mm wide (one-to-one coupled detector design). We performed simulation studies to evaluate the impact of three different event positioning algorithms in such detectors: (i) a weighted energy centroid positioning (Anger logic), (ii) identifying the crystal with maximum energy deposition (1st max crystal), and (iii) identifying the crystal with the second highest energy deposition (2nd max crystal). Detector simulations performed with LSO crystals indicate reduced positioning errors when using the 2nd max crystal positioning algorithm. These studies are performed over a range of crystal cross-sections varying from 1  ×  1 mm2 to 4  ×  4 mm2 as well as crystal thickness of 1 cm to 3 cm. System simulations were performed for a whole-body PET scanner (85 cm ring diameter) with a long axial FOV (70 cm long) and show an improvement in reconstructed spatial resolution for a point source when using the 2nd max crystal positioning algorithm. Finally, we observe a 30-40% gain in contrast recovery coefficient values for 1 and 0.5 cm diameter spheres when using the 2nd max crystal positioning algorithm compared to the 1st max crystal positioning algorithm. These results show that there is an advantage to implementing the 2nd max crystal positioning algorithm in a new generation of PET scanners using one-to-one coupled detector design with lutetium based crystals, including LSO, LYSO or scintillators that have similar density and effective atomic number as LSO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29411709      PMCID: PMC5876041          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaad76

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Image quality assessment of LaBr3-based whole-body 3D PET scanners: a Monte Carlo evaluation.

Authors:  S Surti; J S Karp; G Muehllehner
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Practical considerations for 3-D image reconstruction using spherically symmetric volume elements.

Authors:  S Matej; R M Lewitt
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Super PETT I: A Positron Emission Tomograph Utilizing Photon Time-of-Flight Information.

Authors:  M M Ter-Pogossian; D C Ficke; M Yamamoto; J T Hood
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  A large area, silicon photomultiplier-based PET detector module.

Authors:  Rr Raylman; A Stolin; S Majewski; J Proffitt
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 1.455

5.  Parallax error in long-axial field-of-view PET scanners-a simulation study.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Schmall; Joel S Karp; Matt Werner; Suleman Surti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Characterization of Large-Area SiPM Array for PET Applications.

Authors:  Junwei Du; Yongfeng Yang; Xiaowei Bai; Martin S Judenhofer; Eric Berg; Kun Di; Steve Buckley; Carl Jackson; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 1.679

7.  Design and performance of a high spatial resolution, time-of-flight PET detector.

Authors:  Srilalan Krishnamoorthy; Benjamin LeGeyt; Matthew E Werner; Madhuri Kaul; F M Newcomer; Joel S Karp; Suleman Surti
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.679

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Performance assessment of the 2 γpositronium imaging with the total-body PET scanners.

Authors:  P Moskal; D Kisielewska; R Y Shopa; Z Bura; J Chhokar; C Curceanu; E Czerwiński; M Dadgar; K Dulski; J Gajewski; A Gajos; M Gorgol; R Del Grande; B C Hiesmayr; B Jasińska; K Kacprzak; A Kamińska; Ł Kapłon; H Karimi; G Korcyl; P Kowalski; N Krawczyk; W Krzemień; T Kozik; E Kubicz; P Małczak; M Mohammed; Sz Niedźwiecki; M Pałka; M Pawlik-Niedźwiecka; M Pędziwiatr; L Raczyński; J Raj; A Ruciński; S Sharma; S Shivani; M Silarski; M Skurzok; E Ł Stępień; S Vandenberghe; W Wiślicki; B Zgardzińska
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2020-06-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.