Literature DB >> 22678106

Optimal whole-body PET scanner configurations for different volumes of LSO scintillator: a simulation study.

Jonathan K Poon1, Magnus L Dahlbom, William W Moses, Karthik Balakrishnan, Wenli Wang, Simon R Cherry, Ramsey D Badawi.   

Abstract

The axial field of view (AFOV) of the current generation of clinical whole-body PET scanners range from 15-22 cm, which limits sensitivity and renders applications such as whole-body dynamic imaging or imaging of very low activities in whole-body cellular tracking studies, almost impossible. Generally, extending the AFOV significantly increases the sensitivity and count-rate performance. However, extending the AFOV while maintaining detector thickness has significant cost implications. In addition, random coincidences, detector dead time, and object attenuation may reduce scanner performance as the AFOV increases. In this paper, we use Monte Carlo simulations to find the optimal scanner geometry (i.e. AFOV, detector thickness and acceptance angle) based on count-rate performance for a range of scintillator volumes ranging from 10 to 93 l with detector thickness varying from 5 to 20 mm. We compare the results to the performance of a scanner based on the current Siemens Biograph mCT geometry and electronics. Our simulation models were developed based on individual components of the Siemens Biograph mCT and were validated against experimental data using the NEMA NU-2 2007 count-rate protocol. In the study, noise-equivalent count rate (NECR) was computed as a function of maximum ring difference (i.e. acceptance angle) and activity concentration using a 27 cm diameter, 200 cm uniformly filled cylindrical phantom for each scanner configuration. To reduce the effect of random coincidences, we implemented a variable coincidence time window based on the length of the lines of response, which increased NECR performance up to 10% compared to using a static coincidence time window for scanners with a large maximum ring difference values. For a given scintillator volume, the optimal configuration results in modest count-rate performance gains of up to 16% compared to the shortest AFOV scanner with the thickest detectors. However, the longest AFOV of approximately 2 m with 20 mm thick detectors resulted in performance gains of 25-31 times higher NECR relative to the current Siemens Biograph mCT scanner configuration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22678106      PMCID: PMC3786676          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/13/4077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of image-derived and arterial input functions for estimating the rate of glucose metabolism in therapy-monitoring 18F-FDG PET studies.

Authors:  Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Eric P Visser; Paul F M Krabbe; Bas A van Hoorn; Emile B Koenders; Antoon T Willemsen; Jan Pruim; Frans H M Corstens; Wim J G Oyen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  The 2006 Henry N. Wagner Lecture: Of mice and men (and positrons)--advances in PET imaging technology.

Authors:  Simon R Cherry
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Comparison of imaging techniques for tracking cardiac stem cell therapy.

Authors:  Sarah J Zhang; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Validation of GATE Monte Carlo simulations of the GE Advance/Discovery LS PET scanners.

Authors:  C Ross Schmidtlein; Assen S Kirov; Sadek A Nehmeh; Yusuf E Erdi; John L Humm; Howard I Amols; Luc M Bidaut; Alex Ganin; Charles W Stearns; David L McDaniel; Klaus A Hamacher
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  State of the art and challenges of time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  Maurizio Conti
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 2.685

6.  Measured count-rate performance of the Discovery STE PET/CT scanner in 2D, 3D and partial collimation acquisition modes.

Authors:  L R Macdonald; R E Schmitz; A M Alessio; S D Wollenweber; C W Stearns; A Ganin; R L Harrison; T K Lewellen; P E Kinahan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Effective count rates for PET scanners with reduced and extended axial field of view.

Authors:  L R MacDonald; R L Harrison; A M Alessio; W C J Hunter; T K Lewellen; P E Kinahan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Improvement in lesion detection with whole-body oncologic time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  Georges El Fakhri; Suleman Surti; Cathryn M Trott; Joshua Scheuermann; Joel S Karp
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Imaging characteristics of a 3-dimensional GSO whole-body PET camera.

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Joel S Karp
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb dynamic PET imaging.

Authors:  Mireille Lortie; Rob S B Beanlands; Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Ran Klein; Jean N Dasilva; Robert A DeKemp
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-07-07       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  39 in total

Review 1.  Innovations in Instrumentation for Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Eric Berg; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  Theoretical study of the benefit of long axial field-of-view PET on region of interest quantification.

Authors:  Xuezhu Zhang; Ramsey D Badawi; Simon R Cherry; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  History and future technical innovation in positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Terry Jones; David Townsend
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-03-31

4.  Reaching 200-ps timing resolution in a time-of-flight and depth-of-interaction positron emission tomography detector using phosphor-coated crystals and high-density silicon photomultipliers.

Authors:  Sun Il Kwon; Alessandro Ferri; Alberto Gola; Eric Berg; Claudio Piemonte; Simon R Cherry; Emilie Roncali
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-11-23

5.  Performance assessment of a software-based coincidence processor for the EXPLORER total-body PET scanner.

Authors:  Edwin K Leung; Martin S Judenhofer; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  A physiological perspective on the use of imaging to assess the in vivo delivery of therapeutics.

Authors:  Shengping Qin; Brett Z Fite; M Karen J Gagnon; Jai W Seo; Fitz-Roy Curry; Frits Thorsen; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  First Human Imaging Studies with the EXPLORER Total-Body PET Scanner.

Authors:  Ramsey D Badawi; Hongcheng Shi; Pengcheng Hu; Shuguang Chen; Tianyi Xu; Patricia M Price; Yu Ding; Benjamin A Spencer; Lorenzo Nardo; Weiping Liu; Jun Bao; Terry Jones; Hongdi Li; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Designing a compact high performance brain PET scanner-simulation study.

Authors:  Kuang Gong; Stan Majewski; Paul E Kinahan; Robert L Harrison; Brian F Elston; Ravindra Manjeshwar; Sergei Dolinsky; Alexander V Stolin; Julie A Brefczynski-Lewis; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Ultra staging to unmask the prescribing of adjuvant therapy in cancer patients: the future opportunity to image micrometastases using total-body 18F-FDG PET scanning.

Authors:  Patricia M Price; Ramsey D Badawi; Simon R Cherry; Terry Jones
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Structural and practical identifiability of dual-input kinetic modeling in dynamic PET of liver inflammation.

Authors:  Yang Zuo; Souvik Sarkar; Michael T Corwin; Kristin Olson; Ramsey D Badawi; Guobao Wang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.