Literature DB >> 25525181

Update on time-of-flight PET imaging.

Suleman Surti1.   

Abstract

Time-of-flight (TOF) PET was initially introduced in the early days of PET. The TOF PET scanners developed in the 1980s had limited sensitivity and spatial resolution, were operated in 2-dimensional mode with septa, and used analytic image reconstruction methods. The current generation of TOF PET scanners has the highest sensitivity and spatial resolution ever achieved in commercial whole-body PET, is operated in fully-3-dimensional mode, and uses iterative reconstruction with full system modeling. Previously, it was shown that TOF provides a gain in image signal-to-noise ratio that is proportional to the square root of the object size divided by the system timing resolution. With oncologic studies being the primary application of PET, more recent work has shown that in modern TOF PET scanners there is an improved tradeoff between lesion contrast, image noise, and total imaging time, leading to a combination of improved lesion detectability, reduced scan time or injected dose, and more accurate and precise lesion uptake measurement. Because the benefit of TOF PET is also higher for heavier patients, clinical performance is more uniform over all patient sizes.
© 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lesion detection; lesion uptake; scan time; time-of-flight PET

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25525181      PMCID: PMC4287223          DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.145029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  30 in total

1.  Investigation of time-of-flight benefit for fully 3-D PET.

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Joel S Karp; Lucretiu M Popescu; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Matthew Werner
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Direct time-of-flight for quantitative, real-time in-beam PET: a concept and feasibility study.

Authors:  Paulo Crespo; Georgy Shakirin; Fine Fiedler; Wolfgang Enghardt; Andreas Wagner
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Super PETT I: A Positron Emission Tomograph Utilizing Photon Time-of-Flight Information.

Authors:  M M Ter-Pogossian; D C Ficke; M Yamamoto; J T Hood
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 4.  Designing the magic bullet? The advancement of immuno-PET into clinical use.

Authors:  Brian D Wright; Suzanne E Lapi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Time-of-flight positron emission tomography: status relative to conventional PET.

Authors:  T F Budinger
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Image improvement and design optimization of the time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  W H Wong; N A Mullani; E A Philippe; R Hartz; K L Gould
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Correction technique for cascade gammas in I-124 imaging on a fully-3D, Time-of-Flight PET Scanner.

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Ryan Scheuermann; Joel S Karp
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.679

8.  Design Optimization of a TOF, Breast PET Scanner.

Authors:  Eunsin Lee; Matthew E Werner; Joel S Karp; Suleman Surti
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.679

9.  An assessment of the impact of incorporating time-of-flight information into clinical PET/CT imaging.

Authors:  Cristina Lois; Bjoern W Jakoby; Misty J Long; Karl F Hubner; David W Barker; Michael E Casey; Maurizio Conti; Vladimir Y Panin; Dan J Kadrmas; David W Townsend
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  The imaging performance of a LaBr3-based PET scanner.

Authors:  M E Daube-Witherspoon; S Surti; A Perkins; C C M Kyba; R Wiener; M E Werner; R Kulp; J S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  60 in total

1.  Improvements in PET Image Quality in Time of Flight (TOF) Simultaneous PET/MRI.

Authors:  Ryogo Minamimoto; Craig Levin; Mehran Jamali; Dawn Holley; Amir Barkhodari; Greg Zaharchuk; Andrei Iagaru
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Attenuation correction in emission tomography using the emission data--A review.

Authors:  Yannick Berker; Yusheng Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Innovations in Instrumentation for Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Eric Berg; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.446

4.  PET/MRI for Primary Breast Cancer: A Match Made Better by PET Quantification?

Authors:  David A Mankoff; Suleman Surti
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2021-01-15

5.  Does time-of-flight improve image quality in the heart?

Authors:  R Glenn Wells; Robert A deKemp
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Clinical evaluation of TOF versus non-TOF on PET artifacts in simultaneous PET/MR: a dual centre experience.

Authors:  Edwin E G W Ter Voert; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Sangtae Ahn; Florian Wiesinger; M Mehdi Khalighi; Craig S Levin; Andrei H Iagaru; Greg Zaharchuk; Martin Huellner; Gaspar Delso
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Initial performance studies of a wearable brain positron emission tomography camera based on autonomous thin-film digital Geiger avalanche photodiode arrays.

Authors:  Charles R Schmidtlein; James N Turner; Michael O Thompson; Krishna C Mandal; Ida Häggström; Jiahan Zhang; John L Humm; David H Feiglin; Andrzej Krol
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-11-22

8.  Reaching 200-ps timing resolution in a time-of-flight and depth-of-interaction positron emission tomography detector using phosphor-coated crystals and high-density silicon photomultipliers.

Authors:  Sun Il Kwon; Alessandro Ferri; Alberto Gola; Eric Berg; Claudio Piemonte; Simon R Cherry; Emilie Roncali
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-11-23

9.  The Effect of Defective PET Detectors in Clinical Simultaneous [18F]FDG Time-of-Flight PET/MR Imaging.

Authors:  Edwin E G W Ter Voert; Gaspar Delso; Felipe de Galiza Barbosa; Martin Huellner; Patrick Veit-Haibach
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  The impact of image reconstruction settings on 18F-FDG PET radiomic features: multi-scanner phantom and patient studies.

Authors:  Isaac Shiri; Arman Rahmim; Pardis Ghaffarian; Parham Geramifar; Hamid Abdollahi; Ahmad Bitarafan-Rajabi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.