Literature DB >> 24403611

DOI Determination by Rise Time Discrimination in Single-Ended Readout for TOF PET Imaging.

R I Wiener1, S Surti2, J S Karp3.   

Abstract

Clinical TOF PET systems achieve detection efficiency using thick crystals, typically of thickness 2-3cm. The resulting dispersion in interaction depths degrades spatial resolution for increasing radial positions due to parallax error. Furthermore, interaction depth dispersion results in time pickoff dispersion and thus in degraded timing resolution, and is therefore of added concern in TOF scanners. Using fast signal digitization, we characterize the timing performance, pulse shape and light output of LaBr3:Ce, CeBr3 and LYSO. Coincidence timing resolution is shown to degrade by ~50ps/cm for scintillator pixels of constant cross section and increasing length. By controlling irradiation depth in a scintillator pixel, we show that DOI-dependence of time pickoff is a significant factor in the loss of timing performance in thick detectors. Using the correlated DOI-dependence of time pickoff and charge collection, we apply a charge-based correction to the time pickoff, obtaining improved coincidence timing resolution of <200ps for a uniform 4×4×30mm3 LaBr3 pixel. In order to obtain both DOI identification and improved timing resolution, we design a two layer LaBr3[5%Ce]/LaBr3[30%Ce] detector of total size 4×4×30mm3, exploiting the dependence of scintillator rise time on [Ce] in LaBr3:Ce. Using signal rise time to determine interaction layer, excellent interaction layer discrimination is achieved, while maintaining coincidence timing resolution of <250ps and energy resolution <7% using a R4998 PMT. Excellent layer separation and timing performance is measured with several other commercially-available TOF photodetectors, demonstrating the practicality of this design. These results indicate the feasibility of rise time discrimination as a technique for measuring event DOI while maintaining sensitivity, timing and energy performance, in a well-known detector architecture.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PET; depth-of-interaction; lanthanum bromide; time-of-flight

Year:  2013        PMID: 24403611      PMCID: PMC3881366          DOI: 10.1109/tns.2013.2243166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci        ISSN: 0018-9499            Impact factor:   1.679


  12 in total

1.  Impact of time-of-flight PET on whole-body oncologic studies: a human observer lesion detection and localization study.

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Joshua Scheuermann; Georges El Fakhri; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Ruth Lim; Nathalie Abi-Hatem; Elie Moussallem; Francois Benard; David Mankoff; Joel S Karp
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Benefit of time-of-flight in PET: experimental and clinical results.

Authors:  Joel S Karp; Suleman Surti; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Gerd Muehllehner
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities.

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Austin Kuhn; Matthew E Werner; Amy E Perkins; Jeffrey Kolthammer; Joel S Karp
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Improvement in lesion detection with whole-body oncologic time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  Georges El Fakhri; Suleman Surti; Cathryn M Trott; Joshua Scheuermann; Joel S Karp
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Physical performance of the new hybrid PET∕CT Discovery-690.

Authors:  V Bettinardi; L Presotto; E Rapisarda; M Picchio; L Gianolli; M C Gilardi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  An assessment of the impact of incorporating time-of-flight information into clinical PET/CT imaging.

Authors:  Cristina Lois; Bjoern W Jakoby; Misty J Long; Karl F Hubner; David W Barker; Michael E Casey; Maurizio Conti; Vladimir Y Panin; Dan J Kadrmas; David W Townsend
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  The imaging performance of a LaBr3-based PET scanner.

Authors:  M E Daube-Witherspoon; S Surti; A Perkins; C C M Kyba; R Wiener; M E Werner; R Kulp; J S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Impact of time-of-flight on PET tumor detection.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas; Michael E Casey; Maurizio Conti; Bjoern W Jakoby; Cristina Lois; David W Townsend
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Potential advantages of a cesium fluoride scintillator for a time-of-flight positron camera.

Authors:  R Allemand; C Gresset; J Vacher
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Continuous depth-of-interaction encoding using phosphor-coated scintillators.

Authors:  Huini Du; Yongfeng Yang; Jarek Glodo; Yibao Wu; Kanai Shah; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Innovations in Instrumentation for Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Eric Berg; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 2.  Update on latest advances in time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.685

3.  Impact of detector design on imaging performance of a long axial field-of-view, whole-body PET scanner.

Authors:  S Surti; J S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Characterization of stacked-crystal PET detector designs for measurement of both TOF and DOI.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Schmall; Suleman Surti; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Simulation study of light transport in laser-processed LYSO:Ce detectors with single-side readout.

Authors:  L Bläckberg; G El Fakhri; H Sabet
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Timing and Energy Resolution of new near-UV SiPMs coupled to LaBr3:Ce for TOF-PET.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Schmall; Rony I Wiener; Suleman Surti; Alessandro Ferri; Alberto Gola; Alessandro Tarolli; Claudio Piemonte; Joel S Karp
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.679

7.  Parallax error in long-axial field-of-view PET scanners-a simulation study.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Schmall; Joel S Karp; Matt Werner; Suleman Surti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Positron Emission Tomography: Current Challenges and Opportunities for Technological Advances in Clinical and Preclinical Imaging Systems.

Authors:  Juan José Vaquero; Paul Kinahan
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 9.590

9.  Improving Depth, Energy and Timing Estimation in PET Detectors with Deconvolution and Maximum Likelihood Pulse Shape Discrimination.

Authors:  Eric Berg; Emilie Roncali; Will Hutchcroft; Jinyi Qi; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Predicting the timing properties of phosphor-coated scintillators using Monte Carlo light transport simulation.

Authors:  Emilie Roncali; Jeffrey P Schmall; Varsha Viswanath; Eric Berg; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.