Literature DB >> 15552419

Image quality assessment of LaBr3-based whole-body 3D PET scanners: a Monte Carlo evaluation.

S Surti1, J S Karp, G Muehllehner.   

Abstract

The main thrust for this work is the investigation and design of a whole-body PET scanner based on new lanthanum bromide scintillators. We use Monte Carlo simulations to generate data for a 3D PET scanner based on LaBr3 detectors, and to assess the count-rate capability and the reconstructed image quality of phantoms with hot and cold spheres using contrast and noise parameters. Previously we have shown that LaBr3 has very high light output, excellent energy resolution and fast timing properties which can lead to the design of a time-of-flight (TOF) whole-body PET camera. The data presented here illustrate the performance of LaBr3 without the additional benefit of TOF information, although our intention is to develop a scanner with TOF measurement capability. The only drawbacks of LaBr3 are the lower stopping power and photo-fraction which affect both sensitivity and spatial resolution. However, in 3D PET imaging where energy resolution is very important for reducing scattered coincidences in the reconstructed image, the image quality attained in a non-TOF LaBr3 scanner can potentially equal or surpass that achieved with other high sensitivity scanners. Our results show that there is a gain in NEC arising from the reduced scatter and random fractions in a LaBr3 scanner. The reconstructed image resolution is slightly worse than a high-Z scintillator, but at increased count-rates, reduced pulse pileup leads to an image resolution similar to that of LSO. Image quality simulations predict reduced contrast for small hot spheres compared to an LSO scanner, but improved noise characteristics at similar clinical activity levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15552419     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/19/010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  16 in total

1.  Recent Advances and Future Advances in Time-of-Flight PET.

Authors:  William W Moses
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 1.455

2.  Design considerations for a limited angle, dedicated breast, TOF PET scanner.

Authors:  S Surti; J S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Optimization of time-of-flight reconstruction on Philips GEMINI TF.

Authors:  Stefaan Vandenberghe; Larry van Elmbt; Michel Guerchaft; Enrico Clementel; Jeroen Verhaeghe; Anne Bol; Ignace Lemahieu; Max Lonneux
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Artifacts in digital coincidence timing.

Authors:  W W Moses; Q Peng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Impact of detector design on imaging performance of a long axial field-of-view, whole-body PET scanner.

Authors:  S Surti; J S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  The imaging performance of a LaBr3-based PET scanner.

Authors:  M E Daube-Witherspoon; S Surti; A Perkins; C C M Kyba; R Wiener; M E Werner; R Kulp; J S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Recent developments in PET detector technology.

Authors:  Tom K Lewellen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Performance of the Tachyon Time-of-Flight PET Camera.

Authors:  Q Peng; W-S Choong; C Vu; J S Huber; M Janecek; D Wilson; R H Huesman; Jinyi Qi; Jian Zhou; W W Moses
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 1.679

9.  Parallax error in long-axial field-of-view PET scanners-a simulation study.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Schmall; Joel S Karp; Matt Werner; Suleman Surti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Study of PET scanner designs using clinical metrics to optimize the scanner axial FOV and crystal thickness.

Authors:  S Surti; M E Werner; J S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.