Literature DB >> 29852942

Innovations in Instrumentation for Positron Emission Tomography.

Eric Berg1, Simon R Cherry2.   

Abstract

PET scanners are sophisticated and highly sensitive biomedical imaging devices that can produce highly quantitative images showing the 3-dimensional distribution of radiotracers inside the body. PET scanners are commonly integrated with x-ray CT or MRI scanners in hybrid devices that can provide both molecular imaging (PET) and anatomical imaging (CT or MRI). Despite decades of development, significant opportunities still exist to make major improvements in the performance of PET systems for a variety of clinical and research tasks. These opportunities stem from new ideas and concepts, as well as a range of enabling technologies and methodologies. In this paper, we review current state of the art in PET instrumentation, detectors and systems, describe the major limitations in PET as currently practiced, and offer our own personal insights into some of the recent and emerging technological innovations that we believe will impact the field. Our focus is on the technical aspects of PET imaging, specifically detectors and system design, and the opportunity and necessity to move closer to PET systems for diagnostic patient use and in vivo biomedical research that truly approach the physical performance limits while remaining mindful of imaging time, radiation dose, and cost. However, other key endeavors, which are not covered here, including innovations in reconstruction and modeling methodology, radiotracer development, and expanding the range of clinical and research applications, also will play an equally important, if not more important, role in defining the future of the field.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29852942      PMCID: PMC5986096          DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2018.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  112 in total

Review 1.  Current use of PSMA-PET in prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Tobias Maurer; Matthias Eiber; Markus Schwaiger; Jürgen E Gschwend
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Design and evaluation of the MAMMI dedicated breast PET.

Authors:  L Moliner; A J Gonzalez; A Soriano; F Sanchez; C Correcher; A Orero; M Carles; L F Vidal; J Barbera; L Caballero; M Seimetz; C Vazquez; J M Benlloch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  SiPM optical crosstalk amplification due to scintillator crystal: effects on timing performance.

Authors:  Alberto Gola; Alessandro Ferri; Alessandro Tarolli; Nicola Zorzi; Claudio Piemonte
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Measurement of intrinsic rise times for various L(Y)SO and LuAG scintillators with a general study of prompt photons to achieve 10 ps in TOF-PET.

Authors:  Stefan Gundacker; Etiennette Auffray; Kristof Pauwels; Paul Lecoq
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  A novel single-ended readout depth-of-interaction PET detector fabricated using sub-surface laser engraving.

Authors:  H Uchida; T Sakai; H Yamauchi; K Hakamata; K Shimizu; T Yamashita
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Designing a compact high performance brain PET scanner-simulation study.

Authors:  Kuang Gong; Stan Majewski; Paul E Kinahan; Robert L Harrison; Brian F Elston; Ravindra Manjeshwar; Sergei Dolinsky; Alexander V Stolin; Julie A Brefczynski-Lewis; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Clinical performance of 2 dedicated PET scanners for breast imaging: initial evaluation.

Authors:  Mami Iima; Yuji Nakamoto; Shotaro Kanao; Tomoharu Sugie; Takayuki Ueno; Mayumi Kawada; Yoshiki Mikami; Masakazu Toi; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Optimal whole-body PET scanner configurations for different volumes of LSO scintillator: a simulation study.

Authors:  Jonathan K Poon; Magnus L Dahlbom; William W Moses; Karthik Balakrishnan; Wenli Wang; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Development of an ultrahigh resolution Si-PM based PET system for small animals.

Authors:  Seiichi Yamamoto; Hiroshi Watabe; Yasukazu Kanai; Tadashi Watabe; Katsuhiko Kato; Jun Hatazawa
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Progress in the Development of CdTe and CdZnTe Semiconductor Radiation Detectors for Astrophysical and Medical Applications.

Authors:  Stefano Del Sordo; Leonardo Abbene; Ezio Caroli; Anna Maria Mancini; Andrea Zappettini; Pietro Ubertini
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.576

View more
  12 in total

1.  A preclinical PET detector constructed with a monolithic scintillator ring.

Authors:  Jianfeng Xu; Siwei Xie; Xi Zhang; Weijie Tao; Jingwu Yang; Zhixiang Zhao; Fenghua Weng; Qiu Huang; Fei Yi; Qiyu Peng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Artificial intelligence, machine (deep) learning and radio(geno)mics: definitions and nuclear medicine imaging applications.

Authors:  Dimitris Visvikis; Catherine Cheze Le Rest; Vincent Jaouen; Mathieu Hatt
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-07-06       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Advances in Detector Instrumentation for PET.

Authors:  Andrea Gonzalez-Montoro; Muhammad Nasir Ullah; Craig S Levin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 11.082

4.  How Do the More Recent Reconstruction Algorithms Affect the Interpretation Criteria of PET/CT Images?

Authors:  Antonella Matti; Giacomo Maria Lima; Cinzia Pettinato; Francesca Pietrobon; Felice Martinelli; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-05-01

Review 5.  Pitfalls on PET/CT Due to Artifacts and Instrumentation.

Authors:  Yu-Jung Tsai; Chi Liu
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.446

6.  Image quality evaluation in a modern PET system: impact of new reconstructions methods and a radiomics approach.

Authors:  Gabriel Reynés-Llompart; Aida Sabaté-Llobera; Elena Llinares-Tello; Josep M Martí-Climent; Cristina Gámez-Cenzano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Current advances in the imaging of atherosclerotic vulnerable plaque using nanoparticles.

Authors:  Ming Zhang; Zhongjian Xie; Haijiao Long; Kun Ren; Lianjie Hou; Yu Wang; Xiaodan Xu; Weixing Lei; Zhicheng Yang; Shakeel Ahmed; Han Zhang; Guojun Zhao
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2022-03-07

Review 8.  Hybrid total-body pet scanners-current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Vanessa Nadig; Ken Herrmann; Felix M Mottaghy; Volkmar Schulz
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Detection and quantification of beta cells by PET imaging: why clinical implementation has never been closer.

Authors:  Martin Gotthardt; Decio L Eizirik; Henk-Jan Aanstoot; Olle Korsgren; Dick Mul; Frank Martin; Marti Boss; Tom J P Jansen; Sanne A M van Lith; Mijke Buitinga; Olof Eriksson; Miriam Cnop; Maarten Brom
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 10.  Biomedical Applications of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Current Insights Progress and Perspectives.

Authors:  María Gabriela Montiel Schneider; María Julia Martín; Jessica Otarola; Ekaterina Vakarelska; Vasil Simeonov; Verónica Lassalle; Miroslava Nedyalkova
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 6.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.