Literature DB >> 26108352

Impact of detector design on imaging performance of a long axial field-of-view, whole-body PET scanner.

S Surti1, J S Karp.   

Abstract

Current generation of commercial time-of-flight (TOF) PET scanners utilize 20-25 mm thick LSO or LYSO crystals and have an axial FOV (AFOV) in the range of 16-22 mm. Longer AFOV scanners would provide increased intrinsic sensitivity and require fewer bed positions for whole-body imaging. Recent simulation work has investigated the sensitivity gains that can be achieved with these long AFOV scanners, and has motivated new areas of investigation such as imaging with a very low dose of injected activity as well as providing whole-body dynamic imaging capability in one bed position. In this simulation work we model a 72 cm long scanner and prioritize the detector design choices in terms of timing resolution, crystal size (spatial resolution), crystal thickness (detector sensitivity), and depth-of-interaction (DOI) measurement capability. The generated list data are reconstructed with a list-mode OSEM algorithm using a Gaussian TOF kernel that depends on the timing resolution and blob basis functions for regularization. We use lesion phantoms and clinically relevant metrics for lesion detectability and contrast measurement. The scan time was fixed at 10 min for imaging a 100 cm long object assuming a 50% overlap between adjacent bed positions. Results show that a 72 cm long scanner can provide a factor of ten reduction in injected activity compared to an identical 18 cm long scanner to get equivalent lesion detectability. While improved timing resolution leads to further gains, using 3 mm (as opposed to 4 mm) wide crystals does not show any significant benefits for lesion detectability. A detector providing 2-level DOI information with equal crystal thickness also does not show significant gains. Finally, a 15 mm thick crystal leads to lower lesion detectability than a 20 mm thick crystal when keeping all other detector parameters (crystal width, timing resolution, and DOI capability) the same. However, improved timing performance with 15 mm thick crystals can provide similar or better performance than that achieved by a detector using 20 mm thick crystals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26108352      PMCID: PMC4495586          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/13/5343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  17 in total

1.  Parametric Design Study of a Long Axial Field-of-View PET Scanner using a Block-Detector Tomograph Simulation of a Cylindrical Phantom.

Authors:  William C J Hunter; Robert L Harrison; Steven B Gillispie; Lawrence R Macdonald; Thomas K Lewellen
Journal:  IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997)       Date:  2009-10-24

2.  Image quality assessment of LaBr3-based whole-body 3D PET scanners: a Monte Carlo evaluation.

Authors:  S Surti; J S Karp; G Muehllehner
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Small nodule detectability evaluation using a generalized scan-statistic model.

Authors:  Lucreţiu M Popescu; Robert M Lewitt
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  The 2006 Henry N. Wagner Lecture: Of mice and men (and positrons)--advances in PET imaging technology.

Authors:  Simon R Cherry
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Influence of detector pixel size, TOF resolution and DOI on image quality in MR-compatible whole-body PET.

Authors:  Hendrik Thoen; Vincent Keereman; Pieter Mollet; Roel Van Holen; Stefaan Vandenberghe
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  DOI Determination by Rise Time Discrimination in Single-Ended Readout for TOF PET Imaging.

Authors:  R I Wiener; S Surti; J S Karp
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.679

7.  Effective count rates for PET scanners with reduced and extended axial field of view.

Authors:  L R MacDonald; R L Harrison; A M Alessio; W C J Hunter; T K Lewellen; P E Kinahan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Physical performance of the new hybrid PET∕CT Discovery-690.

Authors:  V Bettinardi; L Presotto; E Rapisarda; M Picchio; L Gianolli; M C Gilardi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Optimal whole-body PET scanner configurations for different volumes of LSO scintillator: a simulation study.

Authors:  Jonathan K Poon; Magnus L Dahlbom; William W Moses; Karthik Balakrishnan; Wenli Wang; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  The imaging performance of a LaBr3-based PET scanner.

Authors:  M E Daube-Witherspoon; S Surti; A Perkins; C C M Kyba; R Wiener; M E Werner; R Kulp; J S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Innovations in Instrumentation for Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Eric Berg; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  Theoretical study of the benefit of long axial field-of-view PET on region of interest quantification.

Authors:  Xuezhu Zhang; Ramsey D Badawi; Simon R Cherry; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Development and Evaluation of mini-EXPLORER: A Long Axial Field-of-View PET Scanner for Nonhuman Primate Imaging.

Authors:  Eric Berg; Xuezhu Zhang; Julien Bec; Martin S Judenhofer; Brijesh Patel; Qiyu Peng; Maciej Kapusta; Matthias Schmand; Michael E Casey; Alice F Tarantal; Jinyi Qi; Ramsey D Badawi; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Quantitative image reconstruction for total-body PET imaging using the 2-meter long EXPLORER scanner.

Authors:  Xuezhu Zhang; Jian Zhou; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Total-Body PET: Maximizing Sensitivity to Create New Opportunities for Clinical Research and Patient Care.

Authors:  Simon R Cherry; Terry Jones; Joel S Karp; Jinyi Qi; William W Moses; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Numerical observer study of lesion detectability for a long axial field-of-view whole-body PET imager using the PennPET Explorer.

Authors:  Varsha Viswanath; Margaret E Daube Witherspoon; Joel S Karp; Suleman Surti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Scanner Design Considerations for Long Axial Field-of-View PET Systems.

Authors:  Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2020-11-05

8.  Parallax error in long-axial field-of-view PET scanners-a simulation study.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Schmall; Joel S Karp; Matt Werner; Suleman Surti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Total-Body Dynamic Reconstruction and Parametric Imaging on the uEXPLORER.

Authors:  Xuezhu Zhang; Zhaoheng Xie; Eric Berg; Martin S Judenhofer; Weiping Liu; Tianyi Xu; Yu Ding; Yang Lv; Yun Dong; Zilin Deng; Songsong Tang; Hongcheng Shi; Pengcheng Hu; Shuguang Chen; Jun Bao; Hongdi Li; Jian Zhou; Guobao Wang; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Quantifying bias and precision of kinetic parameter estimation on the PennPET Explorer, a long axial field-of-view scanner.

Authors:  Varsha Viswanath; Austin R Pantel; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Robert Doot; Mark Muzi; David A Mankoff; Joel S Karp
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-09-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.