Literature DB >> 28935835

Total-Body PET: Maximizing Sensitivity to Create New Opportunities for Clinical Research and Patient Care.

Simon R Cherry1,2, Terry Jones2, Joel S Karp3, Jinyi Qi4, William W Moses5, Ramsey D Badawi4,2.   

Abstract

PET is widely considered the most sensitive technique available for noninvasively studying physiology, metabolism, and molecular pathways in the living human being. However, the utility of PET, being a photon-deficient modality, remains constrained by factors including low signal-to-noise ratio, long imaging times, and concerns about radiation dose. Two developments offer the potential to dramatically increase the effective sensitivity of PET. First by increasing the geometric coverage to encompass the entire body, sensitivity can be increased by a factor of about 40 for total-body imaging or a factor of about 4-5 for imaging a single organ such as the brain or heart. The world's first total-body PET/CT scanner is currently under construction to demonstrate how this step change in sensitivity affects the way PET is used both in clinical research and in patient care. Second, there is the future prospect of significant improvements in timing resolution that could lead to further effective sensitivity gains. When combined with total-body PET, this could produce overall sensitivity gains of more than 2 orders of magnitude compared with existing state-of-the-art systems. In this article, we discuss the benefits of increasing body coverage, describe our efforts to develop a first-generation total-body PET/CT scanner, discuss selected application areas for total-body PET, and project the impact of further improvements in time-of-flight PET.
© 2018 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PET; PET/CT; instrumentation; molecular imaging; total-body imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28935835      PMCID: PMC5750522          DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.184028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  40 in total

1.  A PET study of 18FDG uptake in soft tissue masses.

Authors:  M A Lodge; J D Lucas; P K Marsden; B F Cronin; M J O'Doherty; M A Smith
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-01

Review 2.  Noninvasive cell-tracking methods.

Authors:  Moritz F Kircher; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Jan Grimm
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Measurement of intrinsic rise times for various L(Y)SO and LuAG scintillators with a general study of prompt photons to achieve 10 ps in TOF-PET.

Authors:  Stefan Gundacker; Etiennette Auffray; Kristof Pauwels; Paul Lecoq
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Ultra staging to unmask the prescribing of adjuvant therapy in cancer patients: the future opportunity to image micrometastases using total-body 18F-FDG PET scanning.

Authors:  Patricia M Price; Ramsey D Badawi; Simon R Cherry; Terry Jones
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Optimized sampling and parameter estimation for quantification in whole body PET.

Authors:  K Ho-Shon; D Feng; R A Hawkins; S Meikle; M J Fulham; X Li
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 6.  The Use of Microdosing in the Development of Small Organic and Protein Therapeutics.

Authors:  Mats Bergstrom
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Optimal whole-body PET scanner configurations for different volumes of LSO scintillator: a simulation study.

Authors:  Jonathan K Poon; Magnus L Dahlbom; William W Moses; Karthik Balakrishnan; Wenli Wang; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  [(89)Zr]oxinate4 for long-term in vivo cell tracking by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Putthiporn Charoenphun; Levente K Meszaros; Krisanat Chuamsaamarkkee; Ehsan Sharif-Paghaleh; James R Ballinger; Trevor J Ferris; Michael J Went; Gregory E D Mullen; Philip J Blower
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  MR imaging of the fetal brain.

Authors:  Orit A Glenn
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-11-24

Review 10.  Whole body MRI: improved lesion detection and characterization with diffusion weighted techniques.

Authors:  Rajpaul Attariwala; Wayne Picker
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  120 in total

Review 1.  Frontiers in positron emission tomography imaging of the vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque.

Authors:  Mark G MacAskill; David E Newby; Adriana A S Tavares
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 2.  Innovations in Instrumentation for Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Eric Berg; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.446

3.  Digital PET/CT: a new intriguing chance for clinical nuclear medicine and personalized molecular imaging.

Authors:  Orazio Schillaci; Nicoletta Urbano
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Total-body dynamic PET/CT of micro-metastatic lymph node in a patient with lung cancer.

Authors:  Fangfang Fu; Xiaochen Li; Yaping Wu; Junling Xu; Yan Bai; Yongju Gao; Zhenzhen Wang; Weifeng Zhang; Wei Wei; Georges El Fakhri; Fengmin Shao; Meiyun Wang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Photon counting detectors and their applications ranging from particle physics experiments to environmental radiation monitoring and medical imaging.

Authors:  Ryosuke Ota
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2021-03-19

6.  Image quality and lesion detectability in low-dose pediatric 18F-FDG scans using total-body PET/CT.

Authors:  Yu-Mo Zhao; Ying-He Li; Tao Chen; Wei-Guang Zhang; Lin-Hao Wang; Jiatai Feng; Chenwei Li; Xu Zhang; Wei Fan; Ying-Ying Hu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Dynamic PET imaging with ultra-low-activity of 18F-FDG: unleashing the potential of total-body PET.

Authors:  Xiaoli Lan; Kevin Fan; Ke Li; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  Dynamic whole-body PET imaging: principles, potentials and applications.

Authors:  Arman Rahmim; Martin A Lodge; Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Vladimir Y Panin; Yun Zhou; Alan McMillan; Steve Cho; Habib Zaidi; Michael E Casey; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Structural and practical identifiability of dual-input kinetic modeling in dynamic PET of liver inflammation.

Authors:  Yang Zuo; Souvik Sarkar; Michael T Corwin; Kristin Olson; Ramsey D Badawi; Guobao Wang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Retooling a Blood-Based Biomarker: Phase I Assessment of the High-Affinity CA19-9 Antibody HuMab-5B1 for Immuno-PET Imaging of Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Jason S Lewis; Wolfgang A Weber; Christian Lohrmann; Eileen M O'Reilly; Joseph A O'Donoghue; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Serge K Lyashchenko; Shutian Ruan; Rebecca Teng; Wolfgang Scholz; Paul W Maffuid
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.