Literature DB >> 35819497

An encoder-decoder network for direct image reconstruction on sinograms of a long axial field of view PET.

Ruiyao Ma1,2,3, Jiaxi Hu2, Hasan Sari2,4, Song Xue2, Clemens Mingels2, Marco Viscione2, Venkata Sai Sundar Kandarpa5, Wei Bo Li3, Dimitris Visvikis5, Rui Qiu6, Axel Rominger2, Junli Li7, Kuangyu Shi2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Deep learning is an emerging reconstruction method for positron emission tomography (PET), which can tackle complex PET corrections in an integrated procedure. This paper optimizes the direct PET reconstruction from sinogram on a long axial field of view (LAFOV) PET.
METHODS: This paper proposes a novel deep learning architecture to reduce the biases during direct reconstruction from sinograms to images. This architecture is based on an encoder-decoder network, where the perceptual loss is used with pre-trained convolutional layers. It is trained and tested on data of 80 patients acquired from recent Siemens Biograph Vision Quadra long axial FOV (LAFOV) PET/CT. The patients are randomly split into a training dataset of 60 patients, a validation dataset of 10 patients, and a test dataset of 10 patients. The 3D sinograms are converted into 2D sinogram slices and used as input to the network. In addition, the vendor reconstructed images are considered as ground truths. Finally, the proposed method is compared with DeepPET, a benchmark deep learning method for PET reconstruction.
RESULTS: Compared with DeepPET, the proposed network significantly reduces the root-mean-squared error (NRMSE) from 0.63 to 0.6 (p < 0.01) and increases the structural similarity index (SSIM) and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) from 0.93 to 0.95 (p < 0.01) and from 82.02 to 82.36 (p < 0.01), respectively. The reconstruction time is approximately 10 s per patient, which is shortened by 23 times compared with the conventional method. The errors of mean standardized uptake values (SUVmean) for lesions between ground truth and the predicted result are reduced from 33.5 to 18.7% (p = 0.03). In addition, the error of max SUV is reduced from 32.7 to 21.8% (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate the feasibility of using deep learning to reconstruct images with acceptable image quality and short reconstruction time. It is shown that the proposed method can improve the quality of deep learning-based reconstructed images without additional CT images for attenuation and scattering corrections. This study demonstrated the feasibility of deep learning to rapidly reconstruct images without additional CT images for complex corrections from actual clinical measurements on LAFOV PET. Despite improving the current development, AI-based reconstruction does not work appropriately for untrained scenarios due to limited extrapolation capability and cannot completely replace conventional reconstruction currently.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; Image reconstruction; Long axial field of view PET

Year:  2022        PMID: 35819497     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05861-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   10.057


  18 in total

1.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data.

Authors:  H M Hudson; R S Larkin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography.

Authors:  L A Shepp; Y Vardi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Theoretical study of the benefit of long axial field-of-view PET on region of interest quantification.

Authors:  Xuezhu Zhang; Ramsey D Badawi; Simon R Cherry; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Machine Learning in Nuclear Medicine: Part 1-Introduction.

Authors:  Carlos F Uribe; Sulantha Mathotaarachchi; Vincent Gaudet; Kenneth C Smith; Pedro Rosa-Neto; François Bénard; Sandra E Black; Katherine Zukotynski
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Image reconstruction by domain-transform manifold learning.

Authors:  Bo Zhu; Jeremiah Z Liu; Stephen F Cauley; Bruce R Rosen; Matthew S Rosen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  DeepPET: A deep encoder-decoder network for directly solving the PET image reconstruction inverse problem.

Authors:  Ida Häggström; C Ross Schmidtlein; Gabriele Campanella; Thomas J Fuchs
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Parallax error in long-axial field-of-view PET scanners-a simulation study.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Schmall; Joel S Karp; Matt Werner; Suleman Surti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  State of the art in total body PET.

Authors:  Stefaan Vandenberghe; Pawel Moskal; Joel S Karp
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2020-05-25

9.  Artificial intelligence for reduced dose 18F-FDG PET examinations: a real-world deployment through a standardized framework and business case assessment.

Authors:  Katia Katsari; Daniele Penna; Vincenzo Arena; Giulia Polverari; Annarita Ianniello; Domenico Italiano; Rolando Milani; Alessandro Roncacci; Rowland O Illing; Ettore Pelosi
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2021-03-09
View more
  1 in total

1.  Things are because we see them (O. Wilde): new radiopharmaceuticals for nuclear medicine imaging.

Authors:  Martina Sollini; Rodolfo Hurle; Marcello Rodari; Arturo Chiti; Massimo Lazzeri
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 10.057

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.