| Literature DB >> 25006873 |
Jan Kern1, Rosalie Tran2, Roberto Alonso-Mori3, Sergey Koroidov4, Nathaniel Echols2, Johan Hattne2, Mohamed Ibrahim5, Sheraz Gul2, Hartawan Laksmono6, Raymond G Sierra6, Richard J Gildea7, Guangye Han2, Julia Hellmich5, Benedikt Lassalle-Kaiser7, Ruchira Chatterjee2, Aaron S Brewster2, Claudiu A Stan6, Carina Glöckner8, Alyssa Lampe2, Dörte DiFiore8, Despina Milathianaki3, Alan R Fry3, M Marvin Seibert9, Jason E Koglin3, Erik Gallo10, Jens Uhlig10, Dimosthenis Sokaras11, Tsu-Chien Weng11, Petrus H Zwart2, David E Skinner12, Michael J Bogan13, Marc Messerschmidt3, Pieter Glatzel10, Garth J Williams3, Sébastien Boutet3, Paul D Adams2, Athina Zouni5, Johannes Messinger4, Nicholas K Sauter2, Uwe Bergmann3, Junko Yano2, Vittal K Yachandra2.
Abstract
The dioxygen we breathe is formed by light-induced oxidation of water in photosystem II. O2 formation takes place at a catalytic manganese cluster within milliseconds after the photosystem II reaction centre is excited by three single-turnover flashes. Here we present combined X-ray emission spectra and diffraction data of 2-flash (2F) and 3-flash (3F) photosystem II samples, and of a transient 3F' state (250 μs after the third flash), collected under functional conditions using an X-ray free electron laser. The spectra show that the initial O-O bond formation, coupled to Mn reduction, does not yet occur within 250 μs after the third flash. Diffraction data of all states studied exhibit an anomalous scattering signal from Mn but show no significant structural changes at the present resolution of 4.5 Å. This study represents the initial frames in a molecular movie of the structural changes during the catalytic reaction in photosystem II.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25006873 PMCID: PMC4151126 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5371
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Flash-induced changes in PS II and experimental setup used at LCLS A) Kok-cycle describing the different stable intermediate states of the catalytic water oxidation reaction in PS II. B) Scheme for the illumination setup used to advance PS II in the catalytic cycle and measure simultaneously the XRD and XES signal at LCLS. Lasers 2 and 3 were used to generate 2F samples, lasers 1, 2, 3 for 3F samples and lasers 2, 3 and 4 to generate the 3F′ samples.
Figure 2Oxygen production by PSII A) Relative O2 yield per PSII as detected by MIMS as a function of flash number (measurement shown is for PS II solutions, flow rate 0.5 μl/min, frequency 4 Hz, light intensity was 7 μJ for each fiber). B) O2 yield measured by MIMS as a function of flash number from PS IIsolutions (black) and PS II microcrystals (red).
Figure 3Mn Kβ XES of PS II A) XES recorded with <50 fs X-ray pulses at LCLS. Spectra were measured 0.5 s after two laser flashes (2F, black; lasers 2 and 3 on), or 0.5 s after three laser flashes (3F, blue; lasers 1, 2, and 3 on), and ~250 μs after three laser flashes (3F′, red; lasers 2, 3, and 4 on), respectively. B) Difference between the Mn Kβ XES of PS II, blue: 3F – 2F; red: 3F′ – 2F. Before calculating the difference curves, spectra were smoothed by moving average (dotted line) or cubic polynomial fitting (solid line, similar to the procedure used for analyzing the synchrotron data). (C) the 3F – 2F difference spectrum (green) from SR data collected at 15 K.
Statistics for processed data and refined structures
| Dark (S1) | 2-flash (2F) | 3-flash + 250μs (3F′) | 3-flash + 500ms (3F) | thermolysin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| 1.77 Å | 1.27 Å | ||||
|
| |||||
| 72.93 - 4.9 (5.08 - 4.9) | 72.97 - 4.5 (4.66 - 4.5) | 68.41 - 5.2 (5.39 - 5.2) | 72.96 - 4.6 (4.76 - 4.6) | 34.27 - 1.80 (1.86 - 1.80) | |
|
| |||||
| P 212121 | P 212121 | P 212121 | P 212121 | P 6122 | |
|
| |||||
| 132.9 | 132.3 | 132.6 | 132.4 | 93.0 | |
| 229.0 | 228.7 | 229.3 | 228.8 | 93.0 | |
| 307.7 | 308.0 | 306.8 | 307.9 | 130.4 | |
|
| |||||
| 41292 (4013) | 52965 (5008) | 34679 (3378) | 49771 (4812) | 31458 (3075) | |
|
| |||||
| 99.7 (98.6) | 99.5 (95.8) | 99.7 (98.1) | 99.7 (98.2) | 100.0 (100.0) | |
|
| |||||
| 172 | 153 | 176 | 159 | 16.4 | |
|
| |||||
| 0.281 (0.363) | 0.276 (0.367) | 0.271 (0.347) | 0.278 (0.371) | 0.208 (0.349) | |
|
| |||||
| 0.292 (0.337) | 0.284 (0.393) | 0.289 (0.378) | 0.284 (0.346) | 0.232 (0.368) | |
|
| |||||
| 50244 | 2740 | ||||
|
| |||||
| 41052 | 2415 | ||||
|
| |||||
| 9192 | 5 | ||||
|
| |||||
| 0 | 324 | ||||
|
| |||||
| 5214 | 315 | ||||
|
| |||||
| 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.005 | |
|
| |||||
| 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.92 | |
|
| |||||
| 91 | 91 | 91 | 91 | 95 | |
|
| |||||
| 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0 | |
|
| |||||
| 9.43 | 9.45 | 9.50 | 9.34 | 1.72 | |
|
| |||||
| 207 | 174 | 208 | 180 | 19.6 | |
Statistics for the highest-resolution shell are shown in parentheses. All unit cell angles are 90° for PS II structures, and α=β=90°, γ=120° for thermolysin.
Figure 4Electron density maps obtained for PS II A) 2mF–DFs maps for the dark and B) the 2F data of PS II are shown in grey contoured at 1.0σ, mF–DF maps after omitting the OEC are shown in green and red, contoured at +/−5.0σ. C) mF-mF isomorphous difference maps for the 2F – dark data and D) the 3F – 2F data are shown for both monomers and are contoured at +3σ (bright green, monomer I; pale green, monomer II) and −3σ (red, monomer I; salmon, monomer II) together with the model for the 2F data.
Figure 5Anomalous signal in the XFEL data sets A) Anomalous difference map of the thermolysin data after simulated annealing with the occupancy for Zn and Ca set to zero to minimize model bias. The map is contoured at 4.0σ, extending over the entire thermolysin molecule. The position of the highest peak in the map (Zn atom) is highlighted. B) The same anomalous difference map of thermolysin shown in the region of the natively bound Zn ion, contour level at 3.0σ. C) Anomalous difference map obtained from the 3F data of PS II, shown for one monomer, location of the strongest peak is highlighted, contour level at 4.0σ. D) Enlarged view of the 3F anomalous density for the region of the OEC (contoured at 4.0σ). All maps shown are anomalous difference simulated annealing omit maps.
Figure 6Anomalous signal from Mn for different illumination states of PS II A) Anomalous map of the OEC in PS II is shown for the 2F data (magenta) in monomer I. (B) Anomalous map of the 3F data in monomer I. (C) Anomalous map of the 2F (cyan) and 3F (magenta) data in monomer I, orientation is rotated by 90° around horizontal and vertical axis compared to the view in A. (D) Anomalous map for monomer II, 2F (cyan) and 3F (magenta) data are shown, view direction is similar to panel C. All maps shown are anomalous difference simulated annealing omit maps contoured at 3σ.