| Literature DB >> 24412288 |
Jonathan Reeve1, Nigel Loveridge2.
Abstract
Every hip fracture begins with a microscopic crack, which enlarges explosively over microseconds. Most hip fractures in the elderly occur on falling from standing height, usually sideways or backwards. The typically moderate level of trauma very rarely causes fracture in younger people. Here, this paradox is traced to the decline of multiple protective mechanisms at many length scales from nanometres to that of the whole femur. With normal ageing, the femoral neck asymmetrically and progressively loses bone tissue precisely where the cortex is already thinnest and is also compressed in a sideways fall. At the microscopic scale of the basic remodelling unit (BMU) that renews bone tissue, increased numbers of actively remodelling BMUs associated with the reduced mechanical loading in a typically inactive old age augments the numbers of mechanical flaws in the structure potentially capable of initiating cracking. Menopause and over-deep osteoclastic resorption are associated with incomplete BMU refilling leading to excessive porosity, cortical thinning and disconnection of trabeculae. In the femoral cortex, replacement of damaged bone or bone containing dead osteocytes is inefficient, impeding the homeostatic mechanisms that match strength to habitual mechanical usage. In consequence the participation of healthy osteocytes in crack-impeding mechanisms is impaired. Observational studies demonstrate that protective crack deflection in the elderly is reduced. At the most microscopic levels attention now centres on the role of tissue ageing, which may alter the relationship between mineral and matrix that optimises the inhibition of crack progression and on the role of osteocyte ageing and death that impedes tissue maintenance and repair. This review examines recent developments in the understanding of why the elderly hip becomes fragile. This growing understanding is suggesting novel testable approaches for reducing risk of hip fracture that might translate into control of the growing worldwide impact of hip fractures on our ageing populations.Entities:
Keywords: Ageing; Cortical thinning; Hip fracture; Osteocyte; Osteoporosis; Toughness
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24412288 PMCID: PMC3991856 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.12.034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bone ISSN: 1873-2763 Impact factor: 4.398
Fig. 2Risk mechanisms arising from ageing-related failures in biological protection against hip fracture. These are classified by length scale aligned with the protective mechanisms seen in younger bone. (Scale) Level 1: failure to avoid sideways falls, involving personal physical decline and societal acceptance of fall risk to preserve personal freedom. Repeated falls might in principle weaken the femoral cortex through the sort of “delamination” mechanisms that can occur in man-made composites and making a fracture more likely at the next fall (see text). Level 2: Thinning of the supero-lateral half of femoral neck cortex leads to risk of its local buckling or crushing under compression in a sideways fall, progressing inevitably to complete intracapsular hip fracture. Level 3: Increased remodelling with simultaneous resorption of several adjacent canals (or trabecular surfaces) can destroy the integrity of bone's microstructure if thin bone structures are fenestrated. Here 4 osteons are arrowed: two are undergoing resorption and are about to amalgamate with two others in the resting phase near the periosteal surface of the femoral neck. The walls between osteons are hard to re-create subsequently and the resulting composite osteons have been postulated to constitute the first phase in the gradual “trabecularization” of the femoral neck cortex with ageing [86]. Level 4: The multiple toughening mechanisms operating at nano- through micro-scale are shown in this cartoon from Launey et al. to which the reader is referred for a detailed explanation [98]. The known or postulated effects of age-related disease and disabilities to limit the effectiveness of these mechanisms include: exposure to products that glycate collagen, so stiffening it (especially in diabetes mellitus) and e.g. fracturing crack bridges; loss of heterogeneity of mineralization that might otherwise deflect growing cracks with energy absorption; increased crystallinity that might make some abnormally large apatite crystals vulnerable to fracture; loss with cell death or dysfunction of defined low density structures such as osteocyte canaliculi that deflect cracks; (see text).