Literature DB >> 9916785

Regional differences in cortical porosity in the fractured femoral neck.

K L Bell1, N Loveridge, J Power, N Garrahan, B F Meggitt, J Reeve.   

Abstract

Although bone mass is a contributory risk factor for intracapsular hip fracture, its distribution and porosity within the femoral neck is also important for bone strength. In femoral neck biopsies from 13 women with intracapsular hip fracture (mean +/- SEM: 75.4+/-2.1 years, OP) and 19 cadaveric samples (9 men and 10 women [control], aged 79.4+/-1.7 years), a segmental analysis was used to quantify circumferential variations in the characteristics of cortical bone haversian systems. In female control femoral necks, there was an increasing porosity gradient between the inferior (I) (7.7+/-0.6%) and superior regions (S) (16.05+/-1.8%,p < 0.005). In walking, these regions undergo compression and tension, respectively. In men, a similar trend was observed, but the differences were not significant (I: 11.1+/-1.2%; S: 14.1+/-1.7%; p = 0.133). This porosity gradient was not maintained in the fracture group (I: 10+/-1%; S: 12.65+/-1.2%). In contrast, porosity in the fracture group was greatest in the anterior cortex, being 41% higher in that quadrant than in controls (p = 0.06). The areal density of haversian canals ranged from 16.7 to 21.3 canals/mm2 with no significant differences between fractures and controls. In the control women, mean canal diameter was highest in the superior region (60+/-2.8 microm), and these canals were significantly larger than those in the inferior region (49.4+/-1.4 microm, p < 0.05). This difference was less marked in the fracture cases (I: 53.21+/-2.5 microm; S: 59.1+/-2.8 microm; p = 0.0878). Although the mean canal diameter in the anterior quadrant of the fracture cases was higher than in the control women this did not reach significance (OP/F: 59.5+/-3 microm; control/F: 52.7+/-2.6 microm; p = 0.106). However, the proportion of "giant" canals with diameters >385 microm (defined as the top 0.5% in the controls) was doubled in the anterior region of the fracture cases (OP/F: 1.28%; control/F: 0.69%; p < 0.005). Porosity is related to the square of the canal radius; therefore, such canals make a substantial contribution to cortical porosity. Previous work has shown that the elastic modulus of bone decreases approximately as the square root of porosity. Therefore, the increased porosity and the higher prevalence of "giant" canals have a markedly negative influence on the ability of the cortical shell to withstand stresses associated with a fall. The mechanisms responsible for the localized generation of "giant" haversian canals, and ultimately the "trabecularization" of the cortex, require further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9916785     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(98)00143-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  63 in total

1.  The effect of voxel size on high-resolution peripheral computed tomography measurements of trabecular and cortical bone microstructure.

Authors:  Willy Tjong; Galateia J Kazakia; Andrew J Burghardt; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Role of endocortical contouring methods on precision of HR-pQCT-derived cortical micro-architecture in postmenopausal women and young adults.

Authors:  C E Kawalilak; J D Johnston; D M L Cooper; W P Olszynski; S A Kontulainen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Regional variation of intracortical porosity in the midshaft of the human femur: age and sex differences.

Authors:  C David L Thomas; Sophie A Feik; John G Clement
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Porosity of human mandibular condylar bone.

Authors:  G A P Renders; L Mulder; L J van Ruijven; T M G J van Eijden
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Cortical and trabecular bone in the femoral neck both contribute to proximal femur failure load prediction.

Authors:  S L Manske; T Liu-Ambrose; D M L Cooper; S Kontulainen; P Guy; B B Forster; H A McKay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Targeted exercises against hip fragility.

Authors:  R Nikander; P Kannus; P Dastidar; M Hannula; L Harrison; T Cervinka; N G Narra; R Aktour; T Arola; H Eskola; S Soimakallio; A Heinonen; J Hyttinen; H Sievänen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Structural analysis of cortical porosity applied to HR-pQCT data.

Authors:  Willy Tjong; Jasmine Nirody; Andrew J Burghardt; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Galateia J Kazakia
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Two new regions of interest to evaluate separately cortical and trabecular BMD in the proximal femur using DXA.

Authors:  Sven Prevrhal; Margarita Meta; Harry K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-11-04       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Bone quality: the determinants of bone strength and fragility.

Authors:  Hélder Fonseca; Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves; Hans-Joachim Appell Coriolano; José Alberto Duarte
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Increased cancellous bone in the femoral neck of patients with coxarthrosis (hip osteoarthritis): a positive remodeling imbalance favoring bone formation.

Authors:  G R Jordan; N Loveridge; J Power; M T Clarke; J Reeve
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-03-05       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.