Literature DB >> 15542027

A family history of fracture and fracture risk: a meta-analysis.

J A Kanis1, H Johansson, A Oden, O Johnell, C De Laet, J A Eisman, E V McCloskey, D Mellstrom, L J Melton, H A P Pols, J Reeve, A J Silman, A Tenenhouse.   

Abstract

The aims of the present study were to determine whether a parental history of any fracture or hip fracture specifically are significant risk factors for future fracture in an international setting, and to explore the effects of age, sex and bone mineral density (BMD) on this risk. We studied 34,928 men and women from seven prospectively studied cohorts followed for 134,374 person-years. The cohorts comprised the EPOS/EVOS study, CaMos, the Rotterdam Study, DOES and cohorts at Sheffield, Rochester and Gothenburg. The effect of family history of osteoporotic fracture or of hip fracture in first-degree relatives, BMD and age on all clinical fracture, osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture risk alone was examined using Poisson regression in each cohort and for each sex. The results of the different studies were merged from the weighted beta coefficients. A parental history of fracture was associated with a modest but significantly increased risk of any fracture, osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture in men and women combined. The risk ratio (RR) for any fracture was 1.17 (95% CI=1.07-1.28), for any osteoporotic fracture was 1.18 (95% CI=1.06-1.31), and for hip fracture was 1.49 (95% CI=1.17-1.89). The risk ratio was higher at younger ages but not significantly so. No significant difference in risk was seen between men and women with a parental history for any fracture (RR=1.17 and 1.17, respectively) or for an osteoporotic fracture (RR=1.17 and 1.18, respectively). For hip fracture, the risk ratios were somewhat higher, but not significantly higher, in men than in women (RR=2.02 and 1.38, respectively). A family history of hip fracture in parents was associated with a significant risk both of all osteoporotic fracture (RR 1.54; 95CI=1.25-1.88) and of hip fracture (RR=2.27; 95% CI=1.47-3.49). The risk was not significantly changed when BMD was added to the model. We conclude that a parental history of fracture (particularly a family history of hip fracture) confers an increased risk of fracture that is independent of BMD. Its identification on an international basis supports the use of this risk factor in case-finding strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15542027     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.06.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  116 in total

Review 1.  Development and use of FRAX in osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; E V McCloskey; H Johansson; A Oden; O Ström; F Borgström
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  The effects of body mass index on the hereditary influences that determine peak bone mass in mother-daughter pairs (KNHANES V).

Authors:  K M Kim; Y J Kim; S H Choi; S Lim; J H Moon; J H Kim; S W Kim; H C Jang; C S Shin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Targeted education improves the very low recognition of vertebral fractures and osteoporosis management by general internists.

Authors:  P Casez; B Uebelhart; J-M Gaspoz; S Ferrari; M Louis-Simonet; R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Guidelines for the management of osteoporosis: the present and the future.

Authors:  Juliet Compston
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Genetic profiling and individualized assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  Tuan V Nguyen; John A Eisman
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 43.330

6.  Economic evaluation of osteoporosis liaison service for secondary fracture prevention in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients with previous hip fracture in Japan.

Authors:  K Moriwaki; S Noto
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  A comparison of prediction models for fractures in older women: is more better?

Authors:  Kristine E Ensrud; Li-Yung Lui; Brent C Taylor; John T Schousboe; Meghan G Donaldson; Howard A Fink; Jane A Cauley; Teresa A Hillier; Warren S Browner; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-14

8.  Reduction of pain and fracture incidence after kyphoplasty: 1-year outcomes of a prospective controlled trial of patients with primary osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ingo A Grafe; Katharina Da Fonseca; Jochen Hillmeier; Peter-Jürgen Meeder; Martin Libicher; Gerd Nöldge; Hubert Bardenheuer; Walter Pyerin; Linus Basler; Christel Weiss; Rod S Taylor; Peter Nawroth; Christian Kasperk
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Sister's fracture history may be associated with perimenopausal bone fragility and modifies the predictability of fracture risk.

Authors:  J Sirola; K Salovaara; M Tuppurainen; J S Jurvelin; E Alhava; H Kröger
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Bone health and prostate cancer.

Authors:  P J Saylor; M R Smith
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 5.554

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.