Literature DB >> 18684092

Prediction of incident hip fracture risk by femur geometry variables measured by hip structural analysis in the study of osteoporotic fractures.

Stephen Kaptoge1, Thomas J Beck, Jonathan Reeve, Katie L Stone, Teresa A Hillier, Jane A Cauley, Steven R Cummings.   

Abstract

The role of bone tissue's geometric distribution in hip fracture risk requires full evaluation in large population-based datasets. We tested whether section modulus, a geometric index of bending strength, predicted hip fracture better than BMD. Among 7474 women from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) with hip DXA scans at baseline, there were 635 incident hip fractures recorded over 13 yr. Hip structural analysis software was used to derive variables from the DXA scans at the narrow neck (NN), intertrochanter (IT), and shaft (S) regions. Associations of derived structural variables with hip fracture were assessed using Cox proportional hazard modeling. Hip fracture prediction was assessed using the C-index concordance statistic. Incident hip fracture cases had larger neck-shaft angles, larger subperiosteal and estimated endosteal diameters, greater distances from lateral cortical margin to center of mass (lateral distance), and higher estimated buckling ratios (p < 0.0001 for each). Areal BMD, cross-sectional area, cross-sectional moment of inertia, section modulus, estimated cortical thickness, and centroid position were all lower in hip fracture cases (p < 0.044). In hip fracture prediction using NN region parameters, estimated cortical thickness, areal BMD, and estimated buckling ratio were equivalent (C-index = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.70, 0.74), but section modulus performed less well (C-index = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.58, 0.63; p < 0.0001 for difference). In multivariable models combining hip structural analysis variables and age, effects of bone dimensions (i.e., lateral distance, subperiosteal diameter, and estimated endosteal width) were interchangeable, whereas age and neck-shaft angle were independent predictors. Several parsimonious multivariable models that were prognostically equivalent for the NN region were obtained combining a measure of width, a measure of mass, age, and neck-shaft angle (BMD is a ratio of mass to width in the NN region; C-index = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.75, 0.79). Trochanteric fractures were best predicted by analysis of the IT region. Because section modulus failed to predict hip fracture risk as well as areal BMD, the thinner cortices and wider bones among those who fractured may imply that simple failure in bending is not the usual event in fracture. Fracture might require initiation (e.g., by localized crushing or buckling of the lateral cortex).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18684092      PMCID: PMC2686919          DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.080802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  46 in total

1.  Trabecular eccentricity and bone adaptation.

Authors:  J C Fox; T M Keaveny
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2001-09-21       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Cancellous bone mechanical properties from normals and patients with hip fractures differ on the structure level, not on the bone hard tissue level.

Authors:  J Homminga; B R McCreadie; T E Ciarelli; H Weinans; S A Goldstein; R Huiskes
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Evidence for bone formation on the external "periosteal" surface of the femoral neck: a comparison of intracapsular hip fracture cases and controls.

Authors:  J Power; N Loveridge; N Rushton; M Parker; J Reeve
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Improving risk assessment: hip geometry, bone mineral distribution and bone strength in hip fracture cases and controls. The EPOS study. European Prospective Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  N J Crabtree; H Kroger; A Martin; H A P Pols; R Lorenc; J Nijs; J J Stepan; J A Falch; T Miazgowski; S Grazio; P Raptou; J Adams; A Collings; K T Khaw; N Rushton; M Lunt; A K Dixon; J Reeve
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Effects of current and discontinued estrogen replacement therapy on hip structural geometry: the study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  T J Beck; K L Stone; T L Oreskovic; M C Hochberg; M C Nevitt; H K Genant; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Structural adaptation to changing skeletal load in the progression toward hip fragility: the study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  T J Beck; T L Oreskovic; K L Stone; C B Ruff; K Ensrud; M C Nevitt; H K Genant; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Does body size account for gender differences in femur bone density and geometry?

Authors:  A C Looker; T J Beck; E S Orwoll
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Structural trends in the aging femoral neck and proximal shaft: analysis of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data.

Authors:  T J Beck; A C Looker; C B Ruff; H Sievanen; H W Wahner
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Hip geometry, bone mineral distribution, and bone strength in European men and women: the EPOS study.

Authors:  N Crabtree; M Lunt; G Holt; H Kröger; H Burger; S Grazio; K T Khaw; R S Lorenc; J Nijs; J Stepan; J A Falch; T Miazgowski; P Raptou; H A Pols; J Dequeker; S Havelka; K Hoszowski; I Jajic; S Czekalski; G Lyritis; A J Silman; J Reeve
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Femoral neck BMD is a strong predictor of hip fracture susceptibility in elderly men and women because it detects cortical bone instability: the Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  Fernando Rivadeneira; M Carola Zillikens; Chris Edh De Laet; Albert Hofman; André G Uitterlinden; Thomas J Beck; Huibert Ap Pols
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  131 in total

1.  Sexual dimorphism of femoral neck cross-sectional bone geometry in athletes and non-athletes: a hip structural analysis study.

Authors:  Karen Hind; Lisa Gannon; Emma Whatley; Carlton Cooke
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Genome-wide association of an integrated osteoporosis-related phenotype: is there evidence for pleiotropic genes?

Authors:  David Karasik; Ching Lung Cheung; Yanhua Zhou; L Adrienne Cupples; Douglas P Kiel; Serkalem Demissie
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Age-specific reference values of hip geometric indices from a representative sample of the Japanese female population: Japanese Population-based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Study.

Authors:  M Iki; N DongMei; J Tamaki; Y Sato; S Kagamimori; Y Kagawa; H Yoneshima
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Prediction of hip and other osteoporotic fractures from hip geometry in a large clinical cohort.

Authors:  W D Leslie; P S Pahlavan; J F Tsang; L M Lix
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Diagnostic imaging of osteoporosis and sarcopenia: a narrative review.

Authors:  Carmelo Messina; Gabriele Maffi; Jacopo Antonino Vitale; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Luca Maria Sconfienza
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

6.  Predictive ability of novel volumetric and geometric indices derived from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric images of the proximal femur for hip fracture compared with conventional areal bone mineral density: the Japanese Population-based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study.

Authors:  M Iki; R Winzenrieth; J Tamaki; Y Sato; N Dongmei; E Kajita; K Kouda; A Yura; T Tachiki; K Kamiya; S Kagamimori
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Interindividual variation in functionally adapted trait sets is established during postnatal growth and predictable based on bone robustness.

Authors:  Nirnimesh Pandey; Siddharth Bhola; Andrew Goldstone; Fred Chen; Jessica Chrzanowski; Carl J Terranova; Richard Ghillani; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Does obesity really make the femur stronger? BMD, geometry, and fracture incidence in the women's health initiative-observational study.

Authors:  Thomas J Beck; Moira A Petit; Guanglin Wu; Meryl S LeBoff; Jane A Cauley; Zhao Chen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Impact of sleeve gastrectomy on hip structural analysis in adolescents and young adults with obesity.

Authors:  Madhusmita Misra; Abisayo Animashaun; Amita Bose; Vibha Singhal; Fatima Cody Stanford; Brian Carmine; Miriam A Bredella
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 4.734

10.  Hormone therapy improves femur geometry among ethnically diverse postmenopausal participants in the Women's Health Initiative hormone intervention trials.

Authors:  Zhao Chen; Thomas J Beck; Jane A Cauley; Cora E Lewis; Andrea LaCroix; Tamsen Bassford; Guanglin Wu; Duane Sherrill; Scott Going
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.