Literature DB >> 28407298

Spatial Differences in the Distribution of Bone Between Femoral Neck and Trochanteric Fractures.

Aihong Yu1, Julio Carballido-Gamio2, Ling Wang1, Thomas F Lang3, Yongbin Su1, Xinbao Wu4, Manyi Wang4, Jie Wei4, Chen Yi4, Xiaoguang Cheng1.   

Abstract

There is little knowledge about the spatial distribution differences in volumetric bone mineral density and cortical bone structure at the proximal femur between femoral neck fractures and trochanteric fractures. In this case-control study, a total of 93 women with fragility hip fractures, 72 with femoral neck fractures (mean ± SD age: 70.6 ± 12.7 years) and 21 with trochanteric fractures (75.6 ± 9.3 years), and 50 control subjects (63.7 ± 7.0 years) were included for the comparisons. Differences in the spatial distributions of volumetric bone mineral density, cortical bone thickness, cortical volumetric bone mineral density, and volumetric bone mineral density in a layer adjacent to the endosteal surface were investigated using voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and surface-based statistical parametric mapping (SPM). We compared these spatial distributions between controls and both types of fracture, and between the two types of fracture. Using VBM, we found spatially heterogeneous volumetric bone mineral density differences between control subjects and subjects with hip fracture that varied by fracture type. Interestingly, femoral neck fracture subjects, but not subjects with trochanteric fracture, showed significantly lower volumetric bone mineral density in the superior aspect of the femoral neck compared with controls. Using surface-based SPM, we found that compared with controls, both fracture types showed thinner cortices in regions in agreement with the type of fracture. Most outcomes of cortical and endocortical volumetric bone mineral density comparisons were consistent with VBM results. Our results suggest: 1) that the spatial distribution of trabecular volumetric bone mineral density might play a significant role in hip fracture; 2) that focal cortical bone thinning might be more relevant in femoral neck fractures; and 3) that areas of reduced cortical and endocortical volumetric bone mineral density might be more relevant for trochanteric fractures in Chinese women.
© 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. © 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BONE MINERAL DENSITY (BMD); CORTICAL BONE THICKNESS; FEMORAL NECK FRACTURE; OSTEOPOROSIS; PROXIMAL FEMUR; QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (QCT); STATISTICAL PARAMETRIC MAPPING (SPM); TROCHANTERIC FRACTURE; VOXEL-BASED MORPHOMETRY (VBM)

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28407298      PMCID: PMC5550343          DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  34 in total

1.  Cortical bone: a challenging geography.

Authors:  Roger Zebaze; Ego Seeman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Systematic misregistration and the statistical analysis of surface data.

Authors:  Andrew H Gee; Graham M Treece
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates.

Authors:  Anders Eklund; Thomas E Nichols; Hans Knutsson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Are the etiologies of cervical and trochanteric hip fractures different?

Authors:  C A Mautalen; E M Vega; T A Einhorn
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Ethnic differences in femur geometry in the women's health initiative observational study.

Authors:  D A Nelson; T J Beck; G Wu; C E Lewis; T Bassford; J A Cauley; M S LeBoff; S B Going; Z Chen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  In vivo discrimination of hip fracture with quantitative computed tomography: results from the prospective European Femur Fracture Study (EFFECT).

Authors:  Valérie Danielle Bousson; Judith Adams; Klaus Engelke; Mounir Aout; Martine Cohen-Solal; Catherine Bergot; Didier Haguenauer; Daniele Goldberg; Karine Champion; Redha Aksouh; Eric Vicaut; Jean-Denis Laredo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 7.  Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Steven R Cummings; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-05-18       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  During sideways falls proximal femur fractures initiate in the superolateral cortex: evidence from high-speed video of simulated fractures.

Authors:  Peter M de Bakker; Sarah L Manske; Vincent Ebacher; Thomas R Oxland; Peter A Cripton; Pierre Guy
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 10.  The fragile elderly hip: mechanisms associated with age-related loss of strength and toughness.

Authors:  Jonathan Reeve; Nigel Loveridge
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  14 in total

1.  Physical activity induced adaptation can increase proximal femur strength under loading from a fall onto the greater trochanter.

Authors:  Robyn K Fuchs; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Joyce H Keyak; Mariana E Kersh; Stuart J Warden
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Adaptation of the proximal humerus to physical activity: A within-subject controlled study in baseball players.

Authors:  Stuart J Warden; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Keith G Avin; Mariana E Kersh; Robyn K Fuchs; Roland Krug; Ryan J Bice
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Sex differences in the spatial distribution of bone in relation to incident hip fracture: Findings from the AGES-Reykjavik study.

Authors:  Elisa A Marques; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Vilmundur Gudnason; Gunnar Sigurdsson; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; Thor Aspelund; Kristin Siggeirsdottir; Lenore Launer; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Thomas Lang; Tamara B Harris
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Heterogeneous Spatial and Strength Adaptation of the Proximal Femur to Physical Activity: A Within-Subject Controlled Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Stuart J Warden; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Alyssa M Weatherholt; Joyce H Keyak; Chenxi Yan; Mariana E Kersh; Thomas F Lang; Robyn K Fuchs
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 5.  Fracture Prediction by Computed Tomography and Finite Element Analysis: Current and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Fjola Johannesdottir; Brett Allaire; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 6.  Cortical Bone Mapping: Measurement and Statistical Analysis of Localised Skeletal Changes.

Authors:  Graham Treece; Andrew Gee
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  Secular trends of incidence and hospitalization cost of hip fracture in Tangshan, China.

Authors:  X-L Hou; J-Y Liu; X-H Fan; N Zhang; G-L Cao; Z-B Guo; Y-Y Zhang; Y-H Yu; Y-Q Tian; X-X Sun; F-M Tian
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Statistical parametric mapping of biomechanical one-dimensional data with Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Ben Serrien; Maggy Goossens; Jean-Pierre Baeyens
Journal:  Int Biomech       Date:  2019-12

9.  Discordance in diagnosis of osteoporosis by quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in Chinese elderly men.

Authors:  Xiao-Ming Xu; Na Li; Kai Li; Xiao-Yu Li; Ping Zhang; Yan-Jiao Xuan; Xiao-Guang Cheng
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  A novel method for estimating nail-tract bone density for intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Ling Wang; Yanyu Lin; Minghui Yang; Zhe Guo; Wei Xia; Jie Wei; Chen Yi; Xinbao Wu; Xiaoguang Cheng; Xin Gao
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.