Literature DB >> 11450708

Intracapsular hip fracture and the region-specific loss of cortical bone: analysis by peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

N Crabtree1, N Loveridge, M Parker, N Rushton, J Power, K L Bell, T J Beck, J Reeve.   

Abstract

Generalized bone loss within the femoral neck accounts for only 15% of the increase in intracapsular hip fracture risk between the ages of 60 and 80 years. Conventional histology has shown that there is no difference in cancellous bone area between cases of intracapsular fracture and age and sex-matched controls. Rather, a loss of cortical bone thickness and increased porosity is the key feature with the greatest change occurring in those regions maximally loaded during a fall (the inferoanterior [IA] to superoposterior [SP] axis). We have now reexamined this finding using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) to analyze cortical and cancellous bone areas, density, and mass in a different set of ex vivo biopsy specimens from cases of intracapsular hip fracture (female, n = 16, aged 69-92 years) and postmortem specimens (female, n = 15, aged 58-95 years; male, n = 11, aged 56-86 years). Within-neck location was standardized by using locations at which the ratio of maximum to minimum external diameters was 1.4 and at more proximal locations. Cortical widths were analyzed using 72 radial profiles from the center of area of each of the gray level images using a full-width/half-maximum algorithm. In both male and female controls, cancellous bone mass increased toward the femoral head and the rate of change was gender independent. Cancellous bone mass was similar in cases and controls at all locations. Overall, cortical bone mass was significantly lower in the fracture cases (by 25%; p < 0.001) because of significant reductions in both estimated cortical area and density. These differences persisted at locations that are more proximal. The mean cortical width in the cases was significantly lower in the IA (22.2%;p = 0.002) and inferior regions (19%;p < 0.001). The SP region was the thinnest in both cases and controls. These data confirm that a key feature in the etiology of intracapsular hip fracture is the site-specific loss of cortical bone, which is concentrated in those regions maximally loaded during a fall on the greater trochanter. An important implication of this work is that the pathogenesis of bone loss leading to hip fracture must be by a mechanism that varies in its effect according to location within the femoral neck Key candidate mechanisms would include those involving locally reduced mechanical loading. This study also suggests that the development of noninvasive methodologies for analyzing the thickness and estimated densities of critical cortical regions of the femoral neck could improve detection of those at risk of hip fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11450708     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.7.1318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  44 in total

1.  Evidence for bone formation on the external "periosteal" surface of the femoral neck: a comparison of intracapsular hip fracture cases and controls.

Authors:  J Power; N Loveridge; N Rushton; M Parker; J Reeve
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Bone microarchitecture and strength.

Authors:  David W Dempster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Differences in femoral neck geometry associated with age and ethnicity.

Authors:  K M Kim; J K Brown; K J Kim; H S Choi; H N Kim; Y Rhee; S-K Lim
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Cortical and trabecular bone in the femoral neck both contribute to proximal femur failure load prediction.

Authors:  S L Manske; T Liu-Ambrose; D M L Cooper; S Kontulainen; P Guy; B B Forster; H A McKay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Targeted exercises against hip fragility.

Authors:  R Nikander; P Kannus; P Dastidar; M Hannula; L Harrison; T Cervinka; N G Narra; R Aktour; T Arola; H Eskola; S Soimakallio; A Heinonen; J Hyttinen; H Sievänen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Evaluating the relationship between muscle and bone modeling response in older adults.

Authors:  Lisa Reider; Thomas Beck; Dawn Alley; Ram Miller; Michelle Shardell; John Schumacher; Jay Magaziner; Peggy M Cawthon; Kamil E Barbour; Jane A Cauley; Tamara Harris
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Cross-sectional geometry of weight-bearing tibia in female athletes subjected to different exercise loadings.

Authors:  R Nikander; P Kannus; T Rantalainen; K Uusi-Rasi; A Heinonen; H Sievänen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  WNT signaling in bone homeostasis and disease: from human mutations to treatments.

Authors:  Roland Baron; Michaela Kneissel
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  Increased cancellous bone in the femoral neck of patients with coxarthrosis (hip osteoarthritis): a positive remodeling imbalance favoring bone formation.

Authors:  G R Jordan; N Loveridge; J Power; M T Clarke; J Reeve
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-03-05       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Evaluation of a simplified hip structure analysis method for the prediction of incident hip fracture events.

Authors:  B C C Khoo; J R Lewis; K Brown; R L Prince
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.