Literature DB >> 10865223

Hip geometry, bone mineral distribution, and bone strength in European men and women: the EPOS study.

N Crabtree1, M Lunt, G Holt, H Kröger, H Burger, S Grazio, K T Khaw, R S Lorenc, J Nijs, J Stepan, J A Falch, T Miazgowski, P Raptou, H A Pols, J Dequeker, S Havelka, K Hoszowski, I Jajic, S Czekalski, G Lyritis, A J Silman, J Reeve.   

Abstract

Hip geometry and bone mineral density (BMD) have been shown previously to relate, independently of each other, to risk of hip fracture. We used Lunar DPX "beta" versions of hip strength analysis (HSA) and hip axis length (HAL) software to analyze scans from ten representative age-stratified population samples in the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). All 1617 subjects were >50 years of age, and 1033 were women. The data were modeled with gender and center as categorical variables. The bone mineral density of the upper half of the femoral neck declined at a faster rate with age than that in the lower half. Femoral neck cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI), a measure of resistance to bending, showed no significant age reduction in either gender. However, height and weight effects on CSMI were significantly more beneficial in men than in women (0.002 < p < 0.012) and the weight effect appeared to be mediated by bone mineral content (BMC). Compressive stress (Cstress), defined as the stress in the femoral neck at its weakest cross section arising from a standardized fall, was higher in women. Although Cstress increased with body weight when BMC was held constant, in practice it fell through the association and statistical interaction of rising body weight with rising BMC. HAL, as expected, was strongly positively associated with male gender and also height (p < 0.0001). Hip strength-related indices were markedly center-dependent. Significant differences (p < 0.0001) were noted between the centers for all the variables investigated that related to hip geometry. Adjustment for femoral neck bone mineral content (totBMC) showed these center differences to account for >50% of center variation in hip strength, which remained highly significant (p < 0.0001). We conclude that there are substantial geographical differences in femoral neck geometry as well as in BMD. These geometric variations may contribute to the large variations in hip fracture risk across Europe. The effects of aging on hip strength need to be explored in longitudinal studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10865223     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(00)00300-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  30 in total

1.  Changes in bone mineral density in the hip and spine before, during, and after the menopause in elite runners.

Authors:  Alexandra Tomkinson; Jane H Gibson; Mark Lunt; Mark Harries; Jonathan Reeve
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Bone quality: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Femoral neck geometry in overweight and normal weight adolescent girls.

Authors:  Rawad El Hage; Elie Moussa; Christophe Jacob
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Age-specific reference values of hip geometric indices from a representative sample of the Japanese female population: Japanese Population-based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Study.

Authors:  M Iki; N DongMei; J Tamaki; Y Sato; S Kagamimori; Y Kagawa; H Yoneshima
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Bone imaging: traditional techniques and their interpretation.

Authors:  Holger F Boehm; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 6.  [New techniques for the diagnosis of osteoporosis].

Authors:  A S Issever; T M Link
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Hip bone strength indices in overweight and control adolescent boys.

Authors:  Zaher El Hage; Denis Theunynck; Christophe Jacob; Elie Moussa; Rafic Baddoura; Pierre Kamlé; Rawad El Hage
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Geometric indices of hip bone strength in obese, overweight, and normal-weight adolescent boys.

Authors:  R El Hage
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Evaluation of proximal femoral geometry in plain anterior-posterior radiograph in eastern-Indian population.

Authors:  Sanchita Roy; Rajib Kundu; Shyamalendu Medda; Avanish Gupta; Baljit Kaur Nanrah
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-09-20

10.  Three-dimensional structural analysis of the proximal femur in an age-stratified sample of women.

Authors:  Kristy M Nicks; Shreyasee Amin; L Joseph Melton; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Louise K McCready; B Lawrence Riggs; Klaus Engelke; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.