Literature DB >> 9253270

Bone density and risk of hip fracture in men and women: cross sectional analysis.

C E De Laet1, B A van Hout, H Burger, A Hofman, H A Pols.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative contribution of decline in bone density to the increase in risk of hip fracture with age in men and women.
DESIGN: Incidence data of hip fracture from the general population were combined with the bone density distribution in a sample from the same population and with a risk estimate of low bone density known from literature.
SETTING: The Netherlands.
SUBJECTS: All people with a hospital admission for a hip fracture in 1993, and bone density measured in a sample of 581.4 men and women aged 55 years and over in a district of Rotterdam. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: One year cumulative risk of hip fracture by age, sex, and bone density measured at the femoral neck.
RESULTS: A quarter of all hip fractures occurred in men. Men reached the same incidence as women at five years older. Controlled for age, the risk of hip fracture by bone density was similar in men and women. The risk of hip fracture increased 13-fold from age 60 to 80; decrease in bone density associated with age contributed 1.9 (95% confidence interval 1.5 to 2.4) in women and 1.6 (1.3 to 1.8) in men.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of hip fracture by age and bone density is similar in men and women. The decrease in bone density associated with age makes a limited contribution to the exponential increase of the risk of hip fracture with age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9253270      PMCID: PMC2127146          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.315.7102.221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  76 in total

1.  Changing perceptions in osteoporosis. Several risk factors are important.

Authors:  C W McGrother; M M Donaldson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-20

Review 2.  An update on the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Bone densitometry: does the emperor have clothes?

Authors:  A Kazanjian; C Green; K Bassett
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-06-29       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Changing perceptions in osteoporosis.

Authors:  T J Wilkin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-27

5.  Bone densitometry is not a good predictor of hip fracture.

Authors:  T J Wilkin; D Devendra
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-06

6.  Cost-effectiveness of bazedoxifene incorporating the FRAX® algorithm in a European perspective.

Authors:  F Borgström; O Ström; M Kleman; E McCloskey; H Johansson; A Odén; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Quality and performance measures in bone densitometry: part 1: errors and diagnosis.

Authors:  K Engelke; C-C Glüer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Increase in pore area, and not pore density, is the main determinant in the development of porosity in human cortical bone.

Authors:  C David L Thomas; Sophie A Feik; John G Clement
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  The risk and burden of vertebral fractures in Sweden.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; F Borgstrom; N Zethraeus; C De Laet; B Jonsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Economic evaluation of osteoporosis liaison service for secondary fracture prevention in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients with previous hip fracture in Japan.

Authors:  K Moriwaki; S Noto
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.