Literature DB >> 12531567

Falls explain between-center differences in the incidence of limb fracture across Europe.

D K Roy1, S R Pye, M Lunt, T W O'Neill, C Todd, H Raspe, J Reeve, A J Silman, K Weber, J Dequeker, I Jajic, J Stepan, P D Delmas, F Marchand, W Reisinger, D Banzer, D Felsenberg, J Janott, G Kragl, C Schiedt-Nave, B Felsch, H Raspe, C Matthis, G Lyritis, G Poor, C Gennari, H A P Pols, J A Falch, T Miazgowski, K Hoszowski, R Lorenc, J Bruges Armas, A Lopes Vaz, L I Benevolenskaya, P Masaryk, A Rapado, J B Cannata, M Naves-Diaz, O Johnell, G Dilsen, D M Reid, A K Bhalla, C Todd, J Reeve, J D Finn, A Ismail, M Lunt, T W O'Neill, S R Pye, D K Roy1, J A Kanis, C Cooper, A D Woolf.   

Abstract

There is important geographic variation in the occurrence of the major osteoporotic fractures across Europe. The aim of this study was to determine whether between-center variation in limb fracture rates across Europe could be explained by variation in the incidence of falls. Men and women, aged 50-79 years, were recruited from population-based registers in 30 European centers. Subjects were followed by postal questionnaire to ascertain the occurrence of incident fractures, and were also asked about the occurrence and number of recent falls. Self-reported fractures were confirmed, where possible, by review of the radiographs, medical record, or subject interview. The age- and gender-adjusted incidence of falls was calculated by center using Poisson regression. Poisson regression was also used to assess the extent to which between-center differences in the incidence of limb fractures could be explained by differences in the age- and gender-adjusted incidence of falls at those centers. In all, 6302 men (mean age 63.9 years) and 6761 women (mean age 63.1 years) completed at least one questionnaire concerning fractures and falls. During a median follow-up time of 3 years, 3647 falls were reported by men and 4783 by women. After adjusting for age and gender, there was evidence of significant between-center differences in the occurrence of falls. There was also between-center variation in the occurrence of upper limb, lower limb, and distal forearm fractures. Variation in the age- and gender-adjusted center-specific fall rates explained 24%, 14%, and 6% of the between-center variation in incidence of distal forearm and upper and lower limb fractures, respectively. Given the constraints inherent in such an analysis, in men and women aged 50-79 years, variation in fall rates could explain a significant proportion of the between-center variation in the incidence of limb fracture across Europe. Copyright 2002 by Elsevier Science Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12531567     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(02)00909-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  16 in total

1.  Risk factors for serious fall related injury in elderly women living at home.

Authors:  A Bergland; T B Wyller
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 2.  Geographic and ethnic disparities in osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Jane A Cauley; Didier Chalhoub; Ahmed M Kassem; Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 43.330

3.  Risk factors for fracture of the shafts of the tibia and fibula in older individuals.

Authors:  Jennifer L Kelsey; Theresa H M Keegan; Mila M Prill; Charles P Quesenberry; Stephen Sidney
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Increasing age- and sex-specific rates of hip fracture in Mexico: a survey of the Mexican Institute of Social Security.

Authors:  H Johansson; P Clark; F Carlos; A Oden; E V McCloskey; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Increasing hip fracture incidence in California Hispanics, 1983 to 2000.

Authors:  David S Zingmond; L Joseph Melton; Stuart L Silverman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-03-04       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Risk factors associated with the occurrence of distal radius fractures in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Kensuke Ochi; Yuki Go; Takefumi Furuya; Katsunori Ikari; Atsuo Taniguchi; Hisashi Yamanaka; Shigeki Momohara
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 7.  [The role of hip protectors in the prevention of hip fractures in older people].

Authors:  Lukas A Holzer; Gerold Holzer
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2007

8.  Geographic variation of bone mineral density and selected risk factors for prediction of incident fracture among Canadians 50 and older.

Authors:  Lisa Langsetmo; David A Hanley; Nancy Kreiger; Sophie A Jamal; Jerilynn Prior; Jonathan D Adachi; K Shawn Davison; Christopher Kovacs; Tassos Anastassiades; Alan Tenenhouse; David Goltzman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  From relative risk to absolute fracture risk calculation: the FRAX algorithm.

Authors:  Eugene V McCloskey; Helena Johansson; Anders Oden; John A Kanis
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  A country-specific FRAX model for Botswana.

Authors:  M Kebaetse; S Nkhwa; M Mogodi; J Masunge; Y P Gureja; M Ramabu; T Mmopelwa; I Sharif; A Orford; N C Harvey; E V McCloskey; J A Cauley; J A Kanis; H Johansson
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 2.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.