UNLABELLED: We examined the contributions of femoral neck cortical and trabecular bone to proximal femur failure load. We found that trabecular bone mineral density explained a significant proportion of variance in failure load after accounting for total bone size and cortical bone mineral content or cortical area. INTRODUCTION: The relative contribution of femoral neck trabecular and cortical bone to proximal femur failure load is unclear. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to determine whether trabecular bone mineral density (TbBMD) contributes to proximal femur failure load after accounting for total bone size and cortical bone content. Our secondary objective was to describe regional differences in the relationship among cortical bone, trabecular bone, and failure load within a cross-section of the femoral neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We imaged 36 human cadaveric proximal femora using quantitative computed tomography (QCT). We report total bone area (ToA), cortical area (CoA), cortical bone mineral content (CoBMC), and TbBMD measured in the femoral neck cross-section and eight 45 degrees regions. The femora were loaded to failure. RESULTS AND OBSERVATIONS: Trabecular bone mineral density explained a significant proportion of variance in failure load after accounting for ToA and then either CoBMC or CoA respectively. CoBMC contributed significantly to failure load in all regions of the femoral neck except the posterior region. TbBMD contributed significantly to failure load in all regions of the femoral neck except the inferoanterior, superoposterior, and the posterior regions. CONCLUSION: Both cortical and trabecular bone make significant contributions to failure load in ex vivo measures of bone strength.
UNLABELLED: We examined the contributions of femoral neck cortical and trabecular bone to proximal femur failure load. We found that trabecular bone mineral density explained a significant proportion of variance in failure load after accounting for total bone size and cortical bone mineral content or cortical area. INTRODUCTION: The relative contribution of femoral neck trabecular and cortical bone to proximal femur failure load is unclear. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to determine whether trabecular bone mineral density (TbBMD) contributes to proximal femur failure load after accounting for total bone size and cortical bone content. Our secondary objective was to describe regional differences in the relationship among cortical bone, trabecular bone, and failure load within a cross-section of the femoral neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We imaged 36 human cadaveric proximal femora using quantitative computed tomography (QCT). We report total bone area (ToA), cortical area (CoA), cortical bone mineral content (CoBMC), and TbBMD measured in the femoral neck cross-section and eight 45 degrees regions. The femora were loaded to failure. RESULTS AND OBSERVATIONS: Trabecular bone mineral density explained a significant proportion of variance in failure load after accounting for ToA and then either CoBMC or CoA respectively. CoBMC contributed significantly to failure load in all regions of the femoral neck except the posterior region. TbBMD contributed significantly to failure load in all regions of the femoral neck except the inferoanterior, superoposterior, and the posterior regions. CONCLUSION: Both cortical and trabecular bone make significant contributions to failure load in ex vivo measures of bone strength.
Authors: S L Manske; T Liu-Ambrose; P M de Bakker; D Liu; S Kontulainen; P Guy; T R Oxland; H A McKay Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2006-07-18 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: David M L Cooper; C David L Thomas; John G Clement; Andrei L Turinsky; Christoph W Sensen; Benedikt Hallgrímsson Journal: Bone Date: 2007-01-12 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Paul M Mayhew; C David Thomas; John G Clement; Nigel Loveridge; Thomas J Beck; William Bonfield; Chris J Burgoyne; Jonathan Reeve Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Jul 9-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Peter M de Bakker; Sarah L Manske; Vincent Ebacher; Thomas R Oxland; Peter A Cripton; Pierre Guy Journal: J Biomech Date: 2009-06-13 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: C Muschitz; R Kocijan; A Baierl; R Dormann; X Feichtinger; J Haschka; M Szivak; G K Muschitz; J Schanda; P Pietschmann; H Resch; H P Dimai Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2017-01-30 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Vanessa D Sherk; Daniel W Barry; Karen L Villalon; Kent C Hansen; Pamela Wolfe; Wendy M Kohrt Journal: Clin J Sport Med Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 3.638
Authors: Wei Ling Lau; Michael Linnes; Emily Y Chu; Brian L Foster; Bryan A Bartley; Martha J Somerman; Cecilia M Giachelli Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2012-10-08 Impact factor: 5.992