Literature DB >> 23197364

The heterogeneity in femoral neck structure and strength.

Mariana E Kersh1, Marcus G Pandy, Quang M Bui, Anthony C Jones, Christoph H Arns, Mark A Knackstedt, Ego Seeman, Roger Md Zebaze.   

Abstract

Most measures of femoral neck strength derived using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry or computed tomography (CT) assume the femoral neck is a cylinder with a single cortical thickness. We hypothesized that these simplifications introduce errors in estimating strength and that detailed analyses will identify new parameters that more accurately predict femoral neck strength. High-resolution CT data were used to evaluate 457 cross-sectional slices along the femoral neck of 12 postmortem specimens. Cortical morphology was measured in each cross-section. The distribution of cortical thicknesses was evaluated to determine whether the mean or median better estimated central tendency. Finite-element models were used to calculate the stresses in each cross-section resulting from the peak hip joint forces created during a sideways fall. The relationship between cortical morphology and peak bone stress along the femoral neck was analyzed using multivariate regression analysis. In all cross-sections, cortical thicknesses were non-normally distributed and skewed toward smaller thicknesses (p < 0.0001). The central tendency of cortical thickness was best estimated by the median, not the mean. Stress increased as the median cortical thickness decreased along the femoral neck. The median, not mean, cortical thickness combined with anterior-posterior diameter best predicted peak bone stress generated during a sideways fall (R(2) = 0.66, p < 0.001). Heterogeneity in the structure of the femoral neck determines the diversity of its strength. The median cortical thickness best predicted peak femoral neck stress and is likely to be a relevant predictor of femoral neck fragility.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23197364     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.1827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  7 in total

Review 1.  Role of cortical bone in hip fracture.

Authors:  Jonathan Reeve
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2017-01-13

2.  Physical activity induced adaptation can increase proximal femur strength under loading from a fall onto the greater trochanter.

Authors:  Robyn K Fuchs; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Joyce H Keyak; Mariana E Kersh; Stuart J Warden
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  Physical Activity for Strengthening Fracture Prone Regions of the Proximal Femur.

Authors:  Robyn K Fuchs; Mariana E Kersh; Julio Carballido-Gamio; William R Thompson; Joyce H Keyak; Stuart J Warden
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Difference in the trajectory of change in bone geometry as measured by hip structural analysis in the narrow neck, intertrochanteric region, and femoral shaft between men and women following hip fracture.

Authors:  Alan M Rathbun; Michelle Shardell; Denise Orwig; J Richard Hebel; Gregory E Hicks; Thomas J Beck; Jay Magaziner; Marc C Hochberg
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Heterogeneous Spatial and Strength Adaptation of the Proximal Femur to Physical Activity: A Within-Subject Controlled Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Stuart J Warden; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Alyssa M Weatherholt; Joyce H Keyak; Chenxi Yan; Mariana E Kersh; Thomas F Lang; Robyn K Fuchs
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 6.  The fragile elderly hip: mechanisms associated with age-related loss of strength and toughness.

Authors:  Jonathan Reeve; Nigel Loveridge
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Predicting fractures using trabecular patterns on panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  Wil Geraets; Grethe Jonasson; Magnus Hakeberg
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.573

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.