AIMS: To compare central corneal thickness measurements of three pachymetry devices in eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: Central corneal thickness was measured in 203 eyes after myopic LASIK. Orbscan II scanning slit topography (Bausch & Lomb), SP-2000P non-contact specular microscopy (Topcon), and ultrasonic pachymetry (Tomey) were used in this sequence. RESULTS: Three devices gave significantly different corneal thickness readings (p<0.0001, repeated measure analysis of variance). The measurements of Orbscan II (445.6 (SD 60.0) microm) were significantly smaller than those of noncontact specular microscopy (467.9 (SD 40.2) micro m; p<0.0001, Tukey multiple comparison) and ultrasonic pachymetry (478.8 (SD 41.9) microm; p<0.0001). The value obtained with SP-2000P non-contact specular microscopy was significantly smaller than that taken with ultrasonic pachymetry (p<0.001). There were significant linear correlations between scanning slit topography and non-contact specular microscopy (Pearson's correlation coefficient r = 0.912, p<0.0001), non-contact specular microscopy and ultrasonic pachymetry (r = 0.968, p<0.0001), and ultrasonic pachymetry and scanning slit topography (r = 0.933, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: In post-LASIK eyes, Orbscan II scanning slit topography significantly underestimated corneal thickness. Non-contact specular microscopy gave smaller thickness readings than ultrasonic pachymetry, but these two units showed an excellent linear correlation.
AIMS: To compare central corneal thickness measurements of three pachymetry devices in eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: Central corneal thickness was measured in 203 eyes after myopic LASIK. Orbscan II scanning slit topography (Bausch & Lomb), SP-2000P non-contact specular microscopy (Topcon), and ultrasonic pachymetry (Tomey) were used in this sequence. RESULTS: Three devices gave significantly different corneal thickness readings (p<0.0001, repeated measure analysis of variance). The measurements of Orbscan II (445.6 (SD 60.0) microm) were significantly smaller than those of noncontact specular microscopy (467.9 (SD 40.2) micro m; p<0.0001, Tukey multiple comparison) and ultrasonic pachymetry (478.8 (SD 41.9) microm; p<0.0001). The value obtained with SP-2000P non-contact specular microscopy was significantly smaller than that taken with ultrasonic pachymetry (p<0.001). There were significant linear correlations between scanning slit topography and non-contact specular microscopy (Pearson's correlation coefficient r = 0.912, p<0.0001), non-contact specular microscopy and ultrasonic pachymetry (r = 0.968, p<0.0001), and ultrasonic pachymetry and scanning slit topography (r = 0.933, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: In post-LASIK eyes, Orbscan II scanning slit topography significantly underestimated corneal thickness. Non-contact specular microscopy gave smaller thickness readings than ultrasonic pachymetry, but these two units showed an excellent linear correlation.
Authors: Mohamed A Fakhry; Alberto Artola; José I Belda; Ma José Ayala; Jorge L Alió Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 3.351
Authors: Francesco Boscia; Maria Gabriella La Tegola; Giovanni Alessio; Carlo Sborgia Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 3.351
Authors: Mohammad Soleimani; Hassan Hashemi; Shiva Mehravaran; Mehdi Khabazkhoob; Mohammad Hassan Emamian; Mohammad Shariati; Akbar Fotouhi Journal: Int J Ophthalmol Date: 2013-08-18 Impact factor: 1.779
Authors: Michelle Samuel; Sara M Thomasy; Allison S Calderon; Philip H Kass; Keith Collins; Christopher J Murphy Journal: Vet Ophthalmol Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 1.644