Literature DB >> 11821205

Comparison of corneal pachymetry using ultrasound and Orbscan II.

Mohamed A Fakhry1, Alberto Artola, José I Belda, Ma José Ayala, Jorge L Alió.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare Orbscan II pachymetry with ultrasonic pachymetry in eyes having corneal refractive surgery.
SETTING: Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
METHODS: In this comparative prospective study, 72 eyes (36 patients) were divided into 4 groups: Group 1, 16 eyes with haze after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK); Group 2, 12 eyes with no haze after PRK; Group 3, 24 eyes that had uneventful laser in situ keratomileusis; Group 4, 20 normal eyes. The corneal thickness was measured in all eyes by the Orbscan II (version 3.27.10, Orbtek Inc.) and then by ultrasonic pachymetry (DHC 500, Technology Inc.).
RESULTS: The results between the 2 systems of pachymetry were significant in Group 1 (P < .0001) and not significant in Groups 2, 3, and 4 (P = .056, P = .051, and P = .68, respectively). A statistically significant correlation existed between the grade of haze and the decrease in Orbscan readings (C = -0.821, P < .0001).
CONCLUSION: The Orbscan II pachymetry measurements correlated with the ultrasound measurements in eyes with clear corneas. Haze after PRK decreased the Orbscan pachymetry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11821205     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(01)01277-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II, non-contact specular microscopy, and ultrasonic pachymetry in eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  K Kawana; T Tokunaga; K Miyata; F Okamoto; T Kiuchi; T Oshika
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Comparison of ultrasonic pachymetry with Orbscan in corneal haze.

Authors:  Rana Altan-Yaycioglu; Aysel Pelit; Yonca Aydin Akova
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Comparison between central corneal thickness measurements by oculus pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry.

Authors:  Hani S Al-Mezaine; Saleh A Al-Amro; Dustan Kangave; Abdulkareem Sadaawy; Taher A Wehaib; Saleh Al-Obeidan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by Orbscan II and Pentacam after corneal refractive surgery.

Authors:  Jumpei Matsuda; Osamu Hieda; Shigeru Kinoshita
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Imaging the ocular anterior segment with real-time, full-range Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Marinko V Sarunic; Sanjay Asrani; Joseph A Izatt
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-04

6.  Effect of 2% fluorescein on Scheimpflug central corneal thickness measurements.

Authors:  Stella Briggs; Marwa Bin Moammar
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Topographic indices and pachymetry in healthy adolescents obtained with Sirius topographer.

Authors:  Emilia Cantera; Magdalena Cortes; Roberto Sacco; Gabriele Vestri; Alessandra Micera
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 8.  The thick and thin of the central corneal thickness in glaucoma.

Authors:  Graham W Belovay; Ivan Goldberg
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Corneal pachymetry mapping with high-speed optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Yan Li; Raj Shekhar; David Huang
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by Pentacam, noncontact specular microscope, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal and post-LASIK eyes.

Authors:  Saleh Al-Ageel; Abdulrahman M Al-Muammar
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.