Literature DB >> 16650675

Corneal pachymetry mapping with high-speed optical coherence tomography.

Yan Li1, Raj Shekhar, David Huang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To map corneal thickness before and after LASIK with optical coherence tomography (OCT).
DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-two eyes of 21 normal subjects undergoing LASIK.
METHODS: A high-speed (2000 axial scans/second) 1.3-microm-wavelength corneal and anterior segment OCT prototype was used for corneal scanning. The scan pattern consisted of 10-mm radial lines on 8 meridians centered on the vertex reflection. The entire scan pattern of 1024 a-scans was acquired in 0.5 seconds. We developed automated computer processing for 3-dimensional corneal reconstruction and measurement. Corneal thickness was measured normal to the anterior surface and presented as color pachymetry maps and zonal statistics. The maps were divided into a central zone (<2 mm) and 3 annular areas (pericentral, 2-5 mm; transitional, 5-7 mm; peripheral, 7-10 mm), which were further divided into quadrantal zones. The average, minimum, and maximum corneal thicknesses were computed for zones within the 7-mm diameter. Optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry were measured 3 times at the preoperative and 3-month postoperative visits. Reproducibility was assessed by the pooled standard deviations (SDs) of the repeated measurements. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Optical coherence tomography pachymetric map and zonal statistic, and ultrasound pachymetry.
RESULTS: Before LASIK, central corneal thicknesses (CCTs) were 546.9+/-29.4 microm (mean +/- SD) for OCT and 553.3+/-33.0 microm for ultrasound. After LASIK, CCTs were 513.7+/-44.5 microm for OCT and 498+/-46.6 microm for ultrasound. Optical coherence tomography and ultrasound CCT were highly correlated (Pearson correlation r = 0.97 before LASIK and 0.98 afterwards). Optical coherence tomography CCT was slightly less than ultrasound CCT before surgery (mean difference, -6.4 microm; 95% limits of agreement, -23.2 to 10.4 microm) but slightly greater after LASIK (15.7 microm; -1.6 to 33 microm). These differences were statistically significant, but no more than the CCT measurement differences between ultrasound pachymeters. The reproducibility of the OCT zonal pachymetry averages was roughly 2 microm.
CONCLUSIONS: High-speed OCT provided noncontact, rapid, reproducible pachymetric mapping over a wide area of the cornea. It is equivalent to ultrasound for CCT measurement before and after LASIK. This technology could be valuable for planning keratorefractive procedures and diagnosis of corneal diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16650675      PMCID: PMC1474520          DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.01.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  59 in total

1.  Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound and Orbscan slit-scanning topography in normal and post-LASIK eyes.

Authors:  H S Chakrabarti; J P Craig; A Brahma; T Y Malik; C N McGhee
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal thickness measurements by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Sarah Muscat; Nicola McKay; Stuart Parks; Ewan Kemp; David Keating
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Central and peripheral corneal thickness measurement with Orbscan II and topographical ultrasound pachymetry.

Authors:  Jose Manuel González-Méijome; Alejandro Cerviño; Eva Yebra-Pimentel; Manuel A Parafita
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Central corneal thickness measurements with partial coherence interferometry, ultrasound, and the Orbscan system.

Authors:  Georg Rainer; Oliver Findl; Vanessa Petternel; Barbara Kiss; Wolfgang Drexler; Christian Skorpik; Michael Georgopoulos; Leopold Schmetterer
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Corneal pachymetry in normal and keratoconic eyes: Orbscan II versus ultrasound.

Authors:  D Gherghel; S L Hosking; S Mantry; S Banerjee; S A Naroo; S Shah
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 6.  Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach.

Authors:  M J Doughty; M L Zaman
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.048

7.  Positive correlation of corneal thickness and endothelial cell loss. Serial measurements after cataract surgery.

Authors:  H Cheng; A K Bates; L Wood; K McPherson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-07

8.  In vivo assessment of mechanisms controlling corneal hydration.

Authors:  M R O'Neal; K A Polse
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Central corneal thickness and measured IOP response to topical ocular hypotensive medication in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.

Authors:  James D Brandt; Julia A Beiser; Mae O Gordon; Michael A Kass
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Relation between optical coherence tomography and optical pachymetry measurements of corneal swelling induced by hypoxia.

Authors:  Jianhua Wang; Desmond Fonn; Trefford L Simpson; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  54 in total

1.  Pachymetric mapping with Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Yan Li; Maolong Tang; Xinbo Zhang; Camila H Salaroli; Jose L Ramos; David Huang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  High-speed optical coherence tomography for management after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Mariana Avila; Yan Li; Jonathan C Song; David Huang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 3.  Recent advances in ophthalmic anterior segment imaging: a new era for ophthalmic diagnosis?

Authors:  Aristides Konstantopoulos; Parwez Hossain; David F Anderson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 4.  In vivo imaging of corneal inflammation: new tools for clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Dimosthenis Mantopoulos; Andrea Cruzat; Pedram Hamrah
Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 Sep-Nov       Impact factor: 1.975

5.  Meta-analysis of Pentacam vs. ultrasound pachymetry in central corneal thickness measurement in normal, post-LASIK or PRK, and keratoconic or keratoconus-suspect eyes.

Authors:  Wenjing Wu; Yan Wang; Lulu Xu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Light transmission in the human cornea as a function of position across the ocular surface: theoretical and experimental aspects.

Authors:  James Doutch; Andrew J Quantock; Valerie A Smith; Keith M Meek
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Ultrahigh-resolution measurement by optical coherence tomography of dynamic tear film changes on contact lenses.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Jianhua Wang; Aizhu Tao; Meixiao Shen; Shuliang Jiao; Fan Lu
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Optical coherence tomography combined with videokeratography to differentiate mild keratoconus subtypes.

Authors:  Yaron S Rabinowitz; Xiaohui Li; Ana Laura Caiado Canedo; Renato Ambrósio; Yelena Bykhovskaya
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 9.  Optical coherence tomography: history, current status, and laboratory work.

Authors:  Michelle L Gabriele; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Larry Kagemann; Juan Xu; Lindsey S Folio; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Anterior chamber cell grading by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Yan Li; Careen Lowder; Xinbo Zhang; David Huang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.