Literature DB >> 24790874

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three new optical devices and a standard ultrasonic pachymeter.

Hasan Ali Bayhan1, Seray Aslan Bayhan1, Izzet Can1.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the RTVue spectral optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), Sirius Scheimpflug-Placido topographer, Lenstar optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) and ultrasound pachymetry (USP) devices in terms of their agreement and repeatability of measuring central corneal thickness (CCT).
METHODS: In this prospective study, 50 eyes of 50 patients were included. Three repeated measures were obtained using SD-OCT, Scheimpflug-Placido topographer and USP and five measurements were determined with the OLCR. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement among the instruments, and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) for each comparison were calculated. Intra-examiner repeatability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
RESULTS: The mean CCT by SD-OCT, Scheimpflug-Placido topographer, OLCR, and USP were 525.90±34.08 µm, 525.92±34.10 µm, 530.30±35.62 µm, and 543.50±37.11 µm respectively. All 4 modalities of CCT measurements correlated closely with each other, with Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.977 to 0.995. The mean differences (and upper/lower LoA) for CCT measurements were -0.05±6.77 µm (13.3/-13.3) between SD-OCT and Scheimpflug-Placido topographer, 4.38±3.79 µm (11.8/-3.1) between OLCR and SD-OCT, 4.38±6.03 µm (16.2/-7.5) between OLCR and Scheimpflug-Placido topographer, 13.20±6.46 µm (25.9/0.5) between USP and OLCR, 17.59±6.76 µm (30.8/4.3) between USP and SD-OCT, and 17.58±8.13 µm (33.5/1.6) between USP and Scheimpflug-Placido topographer. Intra-examiner repeatability was excellent for all devices with ICCs>0.98.
CONCLUSION: For most practical purposes, CCT measurements with the RTVue, Sirius and Lenstar can be used interchangeably. Although highly correlated, CCT measurement differences between USP and these 3 optical instruments can be significant depending on the clinical situation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Scheimpflug-Placido topographer; central corneal thickness; optical low coherence reflectometry; spectral optical coherence tomography

Year:  2014        PMID: 24790874      PMCID: PMC4003086          DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.02.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  40 in total

1.  Corneal thickness measurement using Orbscan, Pentacam, Galilei, and ultrasound in normal and post-femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis eyes.

Authors:  Se-Hoon Park; Suk-Kyue Choi; Doh Lee; Eun-Jung Jun; Jin-Hyoung Kim
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Assessment of central corneal thickness using OCT, ultrasound, optical low coherence reflectometry and Scheimpflug pachymetry.

Authors:  Sven C Beutelspacher; Nermin Serbecic; Alexander F Scheuerle
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.597

3.  Corneal thickness measurements in normal and keratoconic eyes: Pentacam comprehensive eye scanner versus noncontact specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry.

Authors:  Omür Ozlenen Uçakhan; Muhip Ozkan; Ayfer Kanpolat
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Evaluating central corneal thickness measurements with noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometry and contact ultrasound pachymetry.

Authors:  Suzanna Airiani; Stephen L Trokel; Shing M Lee; Richard E Braunstein
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Comparison of fourier-domain and time-domain optical coherence tomography for assessment of corneal thickness and intersession repeatability.

Authors:  Gaurav Prakash; Amar Agarwal; Soosan Jacob; Dhivya Ashok Kumar; Athiya Agarwal; Rumki Banerjee
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  A clinical comparison of optical and ultrasonic pachometry.

Authors:  J Nissen; J O Hjortdal; N Ehlers; K Frost-Larsen; T Sørensen
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1991-10

7.  Central corneal thickness measurements: using an ultrasonic instrument and 4 optical instruments.

Authors:  Ravaughn Williams; Barbara A Fink; P Ewen King-Smith; G Lynn Mitchell
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.651

8.  Central corneal thickness measurements with different imaging devices and ultrasound pachymetry.

Authors:  Lai-Yong Tai; Keat-Ween Khaw; Choung-Min Ng; Visvaraja Subrayan
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 9.  Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach.

Authors:  M J Doughty; M L Zaman
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.048

10.  Relationship of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy severity to central corneal thickness.

Authors:  Laura J Kopplin; Katie Przepyszny; Brian Schmotzer; Karen Rudo; Denise C Babineau; Sanjay V Patel; David D Verdier; Ula Jurkunas; Sudha K Iyengar; Jonathan H Lass
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04
View more
  18 in total

1.  Author reply: central corneal thickness determination in corneal edema.

Authors:  D Kuerten; N Plange; P Walter; M Fuest
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Repeatability and agreement of central corneal thickness measurement with non-contact methods: a comparative study.

Authors:  Tarannum Mansoori; Nagalla Balakrishna
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Corneal biomechanical changes and intraocular pressure in patients with thyroid orbitopathy.

Authors:  Zofia Pniakowska; Anna Klysik; Roman Gos; Piotr Jurowski
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Monitoring of central corneal thickness after phacoemulsification-comparison of statical and rotating Scheimpflug pachymetry, and spectral-domain OCT.

Authors:  Daniel M Handzel; Carsten H Meyer; Alfred Wegener
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 1.645

5.  Comparison of two different scheimpflug devices in the detection of keratoconus, regular astigmatism, and healthy corneas.

Authors:  David Finis; Bernhard Ralla; Maria Karbe; Maria Borrelli; Stefan Schrader; Gerd Geerling
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Evaluation of Central Corneal Thickness Using Corneal Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer Corvis ST and Comparison with Pentacam Rotating Scheimpflug System and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Normal Eyes.

Authors:  Ayong Yu; Weiqi Zhao; Giacomo Savini; Zixu Huang; Fangjun Bao; Weicong Lu; Qinmei Wang; Jinhai Huang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 1.909

7.  Comparison of ocular biometric measurements between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography and a common optical low coherence reflectometry.

Authors:  Rongrong Gao; Hao Chen; Giacomo Savini; Yaxin Miao; Xiaorui Wang; Jing Yang; Weiqi Zhao; Qinmei Wang; Jinhai Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  [Pachymetry and intraocular pressure measurement by corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST): A clinical comparison to the gold standard].

Authors:  J Steinberg; J Mehlan; A Frings; V Druchkiv; G Richard; T Katz; S J Linke
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  Comparison of Measurement of Central Corneal Thickness with Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Standard Ultrasonic Pachymeter in Premature Infants.

Authors:  Emre Hekimoglu; Muhammet Kazım Erol; Devrim Toslak; Deniz Turgut Coban; Berna Doğan; Ozgur Yucel
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Single session, intrauser repeatability of anterior chamber biometric and corneal pachy-volumetric parameters using a new Scheimpflug+Placido device.

Authors:  Gaurav Prakash; Dhruv Srivastava
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2015-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.