Literature DB >> 11377895

Accuracy of Orbscan pachymetry measurements and DHG ultrasound pachymetry in primary laser in situ keratomileusis and LASIK enhancement procedures.

N G Iskander1, E Anderson Penno, N T Peters, H V Gimbel, M Ferensowicz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy and variability in pachymetry measurements obtained by Orbscan and by DGH ultrasound in primary laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and LASIK enhancement procedures.
SETTING: Gimbel Eye Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 906 consecutive primary LASIK and 183 consecutive LASIK enhancement procedures for which preoperative DGH ultrasound and Orbscan pachymetry measurements were obtained. The theoretical residual corneal thickness was compared to measurements by both instruments in 60 eyes that had primary procedures and enhancements.
RESULTS: In primary LASIK eyes, the DGH ultrasound measurements were thicker than the Orbscan measurements by a mean of 18.4 microm +/- 17.4 (SD). The DGH ultrasound measurements were thicker than the Orbscan measurements by a mean of 50.1 +/- 40.7 microm in preenhancement pachymetry measurements. The DGH ultrasound measurements were consistent with theoretical residual corneal thickness, 493.0 +/- 42.0 microm versus 487.0 +/- 31.0 microm (P =.65), while Orbscan measurements were statistically less than the theoretical residual corneal thickness, 431.0 +/- 42.0 microm versus 468.0 +/- 39.0 microm (P =.0001).
CONCLUSION: DGH ultrasound was a more accurate measurement of corneal pachymetry than Orbscan. The discrepancies between DGH ultrasound and Orbscan pachymetry measurements were more prominent in eyes that had had LASIK.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11377895     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(01)00820-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II, non-contact specular microscopy, and ultrasonic pachymetry in eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  K Kawana; T Tokunaga; K Miyata; F Okamoto; T Kiuchi; T Oshika
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Comparison of ultrasonic pachymetry with Orbscan in corneal haze.

Authors:  Rana Altan-Yaycioglu; Aysel Pelit; Yonca Aydin Akova
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Comparison between central corneal thickness measurements by oculus pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry.

Authors:  Hani S Al-Mezaine; Saleh A Al-Amro; Dustan Kangave; Abdulkareem Sadaawy; Taher A Wehaib; Saleh Al-Obeidan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Meta-analysis of Pentacam vs. ultrasound pachymetry in central corneal thickness measurement in normal, post-LASIK or PRK, and keratoconic or keratoconus-suspect eyes.

Authors:  Wenjing Wu; Yan Wang; Lulu Xu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Difference in normal corneal thickness and curvature between Mongolian and Han nationalities.

Authors:  Hai-Xia Zhao; Li Zhang; Wen-Ying Guan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by Orbscan II and Pentacam after corneal refractive surgery.

Authors:  Jumpei Matsuda; Osamu Hieda; Shigeru Kinoshita
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Corneal pachymetry mapping with high-speed optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Yan Li; Raj Shekhar; David Huang
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Central corneal thickness measured by the Orbscan II system, contact ultrasound pachymetry, and the Artemis 2 system.

Authors:  Tania Paul; Mira Lim; Christopher E Starr; Harriet O Lloyd; D Jackson Coleman; Ronald H Silverman
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Repeatability of corneal parameters with Pentacam after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Rajeev Jain; Grewal Dilraj; Satinder Pal Singh Grewal
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Comparability and repeatability of pachymetry in keratoconus using four noncontact techniques.

Authors:  Mukesh Kumar; Rohit Shetty; Chaitra Jayadev; Debarun Dutta
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.