| Literature DB >> 34685609 |
Matthew Amoni1,2,3, Eef Dries1, Sebastian Ingelaere1,2, Dylan Vermoortele4, H Llewelyn Roderick1, Piet Claus4, Rik Willems1,2, Karin R Sipido1.
Abstract
Ischemic heart disease is the most common cause of lethal ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). In patients who are at high risk after myocardial infarction, implantable cardioverter defibrillators are the most effective treatment to reduce incidence of SCD and ablation therapy can be effective for ventricular arrhythmias with identifiable culprit lesions. Yet, these approaches are not always successful and come with a considerable cost, while pharmacological management is often poor and ineffective, and occasionally proarrhythmic. Advances in mechanistic insights of arrhythmias and technological innovation have led to improved interventional approaches that are being evaluated clinically, yet pharmacological advancement has remained behind. We review the mechanistic basis for current management and provide a perspective for gaining new insights that centre on the complex tissue architecture of the arrhythmogenic infarct and border zone with surviving cardiac myocytes as the source of triggers and central players in re-entry circuits. Identification of the arrhythmia critical sites and characterisation of the molecular signature unique to these sites can open avenues for targeted therapy and reduce off-target effects that have hampered systemic pharmacotherapy. Such advances are in line with precision medicine and a patient-tailored therapy.Entities:
Keywords: action potential; arrhythmias; calcium; cardiac remodelling; fibrosis; hypertrophy; myocardial infarction
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34685609 PMCID: PMC8534043 DOI: 10.3390/cells10102629
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Figure 1Sudden cardiac death and ischemic heart disease (IHD). (A) Estimated short-term mortality following myocardial infarction (Adapted from [7] and respective clinical trials). β-block–β-blocker therapy; Defib–defibrillation; CCU–coronary care unit; PCI–percutaneous coronary intervention. (B) Sudden cardiac death accounts for the largest proportion of death in IHD (Adapted from [5]). (C) Incidence rates of sudden cardiac death events (sudden cardiac death or resuscitated sudden cardiac death) in the first 6 months after myocardial infarction (Adapted from [3]). CV–cardiovascular.
Figure 2Risk assessment and management of ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial infarction. The flowchart was derived from [16,22,23]. Abbreviations: GBM–Guideline-based medical therapy; VT–ventricular tachycardia; VF–ventricular fibrillation; EPS–Electrophysiological study; WCD–wearable cardioverter-defibrillator; ILR–implantable loop recorder; ICD–implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. LVEF–left ventricular ejection fraction.
Figure 3The unique nature of the myocardial infarction border zone. (A) Picture of a pig heart from with ischaemia/reperfusion injury-induced myocardial infarction after 1 month, illustrating the histological fibrotic structure of the scar (left insert) the mixed fibrosis and myocytes in the border zone (middle insert) and the healthy/non-infarcted remote myocardium (right insert) by Picosirius red staining (Adapted from [49]). (B) Schematic diagram illustrating the multicellular milieu of the border zone as transition between scar and myocardium without ischemic damage (remote myocardium).
Figure 4Arrhythmia mechanisms in vivo. (A) Example of ventricular arrhythmia initiation by a premature ventricular complex (PVC) from ICD recording of a patient. (B) Top: Initiation of ventricular tachycardia by a PVC during increased adrenergic drive from a loop recorder of an awake, freely-moving pig with ICM (top) and mapping of PVCs provoked by adrenergic stimulation in an anesthetised animal. Bottom: probing the site of PVCs utilizing monophasic action potential (MAP) catheters (right) revealed that the dominant mechanism is delayed after depolarisation-triggered activity (Adapted from [49]). (C) MAP recording illustrating beat-to-beat variability of repolarisation, a functional substrate, is increased in the border zone during sympathetic stimulation (Adapted from [89]]). (D) Illustration of the fixed scar substrate: left, example of high-definition ex vivo cardiac magnetic resonance imaging highlighting the infarct (top) used to reconstruct the infarct in 3D (bottom); right reentrant mechanism of tachycardia utilizing channel of surviving myocytes in the BZ (Adapted from [90]).
Regional myocyte electrical remodelling after myocardial infarction.
| Study | Species | MI Stage | Disease Model | Regions | Preparation | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tsujii et al., 2003 [ | Rat | Acute (2 h) | LAD ligation | BZ (epi) vs. remote (epi) | tissue LV (optical mapping) | Ca2+ waves in BZ, uniform synchronous CaT in remote. |
| Takahashi et al., 2004 [ | Dog | Acute (3–4 h) | Ligation side branch of LCX (ex vivo) | BZ (epi) vs. remote (epi) | tissue LV (optical mapping) | ↓ APD90, ↓ CV, ↓ APA, ↓ diastolic potential in BZ vs. remote. |
| Baba et al., 2005 [ | Dog | Intermediate (5 d) | LAD ligation | central vs. outer reentry path (cBZ vs. oBZ) | single myocytes LV (whole-cell patch-clamp) | ↓ INa, ↓ ICaL, ↓ Ito in cBZ and oBZ. |
| Cabo et al., 2006 [ | Dog | Intermediate (5 d) | LAD ligation | different regions of reentry path within BZ (epi): central vs. outer reentry path (cBZ vs. oBZ) | single myocytes and tissue LV (electrogram) | ↓ CV longitudinal and transverse vs. normal hearts, ↓ longitudinal CV in cBZ vs. oBZ myocytes, transverse CV unchanged in cBZ vs. oBZ myocytes. |
| Hund T et al., 2008 [ | Dog | Intermediate (5 d) | LAD ligation (2h) + reperfusion | BZ (epi) vs. remote (epi) | in silico | ↓ CaT amplitude, ↓ Vmax in BZ vs. remote with hyperactive CaMKII |
| Chou et al., 2007 [ | Rabbit | Intermediate (7 d) | LCX ligation | BZ (epi) vs. remote (epi) | tissue LV (optical mapping) | ↑ extrasystoles in BZ, steeper ADP restitution in BZ, ↑ pacing-induced Ca2+ alternans in BZ vs. remote |
| Mills et al., 2006 [ | Rat | Intermediate (7 d) | LAD ligation | BZ (epi) vs. remote (epi) | tissue LV (optical mapping) | APD90 = in BZ vs. remote, ↓ CV in BZ vs. remote. |
| Pop et al., 2012 [ | Pig | Chronic (4 w) | Balloon occlusion in LAD or LCX (90 min) + reperfusion | BZ (epi) vs. remote (epi) | tissue LV (optical mapping) | ↓ APD90 in BZ vs. remote |
| Pinali et al., 2017 [ | Pig | Chronic (4 w) | Microbead embolisation in LAD side branch | BZ vs. remote | tissue LV sampling | Cav1.2 =, BIN1 =, ↓JP2 in BZ vs. remote |
| Dun et al., 2004 [ | Dog | Intermediate (14 d), Chronic (8 w) | LAD ligation | BZ (epi) vs. remote (epi) | single myocytes LV (whole-cell patch-clamp) | 14d: ↓ ICaL in BZ vs. remote, ↑ ISO effect in remote (presence of regional heterogeneity in adrenergic response); ↓ Ito in BZ vs. remote |
| Dries and Amoni et al., 2020 [ | Pig | Chronic (6 w) | Copper-coated stent in LAD | BZ (mid) vs. remote (mid) | single myocytes LV (whole-cell patch-clamp) | ↑ DADs and spontaneous AP in BZ vs. remote, ↑ BVR in BZ vs. remote (with adrenergic signalling). |
| Kim et al., 2002 [ | Sheep | Chronic (8 w) | LAD ligation | BZ (endo) vs. remote (endo) | single myocytes LV (whole-cell patch-clamp) | ↓ ICaL, ↓ CaT amplitude, ↑ CaT relaxation time, ↓ contraction in BZ vs. remote. |
| Shimkunas et al., 2013 [ | Sheep | Chronic (17 w) | LCX ligation | BZ (epi) vs. remote (epi) | tissue LV (force measurements) | ↓ force development in BZ vs. remote |
| Wong et al. 1982 [ | Cat | Chronic (2–7 months) | Ligation side branches of LAD and LCX | BZ (endo) vs. remote (endo) | tissue LV (microelectrode) | ↓ APD90, ↓ RMP (depolarised), ↓ Vmax in BZ vs. remote |
| Kimura et al. 1986 [ | Cat | Chronic (2–6 months) | Ligation side branches of LAD and LCX | BZ (endo) vs. remote (endo) | tissue LV (ion-sensitive microelectrodes) | ↓ [K+], ↑ [Na+] in BZ vs. remote |
| Pinto et al. 1997 [ | Cat | Chronic (>2 months) | Ligation side branches of LAD | BZ (endo) vs. remote (endo) | single myocytes LV (whole-cell patch-clamp) | ↓ ICaL in BZ and remote vs. control, ↓ APD in BZ, ↑ ADP in remote |
| Kimura et al. 1988 [ | Cat | Chronic (>2 months) | Ligation side branches of LAD and LCX | BZ (endo) vs. remote (endo) | tissue LV (microelectrode) | RMP =, APA =, APD90 =, APD50 = in BZ vs. remote |
| Weigand et al., 2016 [ | Rat | Chronic (6 w) | LAD ligation | BZ (epi) vs. remote (epi) | whole heart (in vivo LV mapping) | ↓ MAPA, ↑ heterogeneity of repolarisation, ↓ Vmax, MAPD = in BZ vs. remote |
| Walker et al., 2007 [ | Rabbit | Chronic (8 w) | LCX ligation | BZ (epi) vs. remote (epi) | tissue LV (optical mapping) | ↓ CV in BZ vs. remote |
| Dangman et al. 1982 [ | Human | Chronic (end-stage HF) | - | BZ (endo) vs. remote (endo) | tissue LV (microelectrode) | ADP50 =, ADP100 =, Vmax =, RMP =, APA = in BZ vs. remote |
| Heygi et al., 2018 [ | Pig | Chronic (5 months) | Microbead embolisation in LAD side branch | BZ vs. remote | single myocytes LV (whole-cell patch-clamp) | ↓APD95 in BZ, ↑ APD95 in remote, CaT amplitude/relaxation =, INa =, ↓ ICaL, ↓IK1, IKr =, INCX =, IKs =, ↑ DAD/AP frequency in BZ vs. remote |
| Loennechen et al., 2002 [ | Rat | Chronic (56 d) | LAD ligation | Remote vs. sham, Remote vs. BZ | single myocytes LV | ↑ diastolic and systolic [Ca2+] in remote MI vs. sham; = diastolic and systolic [Ca2+] in remote vs. BZ |
| Kilic et al., 2006 [ | Sheep | Chronic (8 w) | LAD ligation | BZ vs. remote | whole heart (in vivo LV echo) | ↓ SERCA, ↓ PLB in peri-infarct vs. remote (correlated with regional strain on echo) |
| Tomek et al., 2019 [ | Rat | Chronic (8 w) | Antero-apical cryo-infarction | BZ (epi) vs. remote (epi) | tissue LV (optical mapping) | ↑ alternans at longer cycle length in BZ vs. remote at baseline; ↓ alternans at longer cycle length in BZ vs. remote during adrenergic signalling |
LAD—left anterior descending; LCX—left circumflex; LV—left ventricle; epi—epicardium; BZ—border zone; CaT—Ca2+ transient; APD—action potential duration; CV—conduction velocity; APA—action potential amplitude; Cx43—connexin-43; cBZ—central border zone; oBZ—outer border zone; P-CaMKII—phosphorylated Ca2+-calmodulin kinase 2; Cav—Calcium channel protein; BIN—bridging integrator; JP2—junctophilin; TT—transvers tubule; ICaL—long Ca2+current; ISO—Isoproterenol; DAD—delayed afterdepolarisation; BVR—beat-to-beat variability of repolarisation; RMP—resting membrane potential; Vmax = maximum upstroke velocity of action potential; Ito transient outward K+ current NPPA - Natriuretic peptide A; SERCA—sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase; INa—Na+ current; IK1—inward rectifying K+ current; IKr—rapid-delayed rectifying K+ current; INCX Na+-K+ exchange current; IKs—slow-delayed rectifying K+ current; MAPA—monophasic action potential amplitude; MAPD = monophasic action potential duration; PLB—phospholamban.
Figure 5Differential regional remodelling of cardiomyocytes: propensity for DADs and triggered action potentials as well as lability of repolarisation. (A) Resting membrane potential (RMP) of regional isolated cardiomyocytes, border zone (BZ) cardiomyocytes have a more depolarised RMP. (B) Reduced IK1 under ISO (isoproterenol) in BZ cardiomyocytes, a contributor to depolarised RMP and propensity for triggered activity. (C) Spontaneous Ca2+ release events and triggered action potentials are increased in MI BZ cardiomyocytes during adrenergic stimulation. (D) Spontaneous Ca2+ release and delayed afterdepolarisations (DADs) influence action potential duration and resultant beat-to-beat variability of repolarisation (BVR). (Adapted from [49,89]).
Figure 6Arrhythmia site-directed studies. (A) Left, Electroanatomical mapping of a premature ventricular complex (PVC) preferred site, red arrow (left) and recording of the presence of triggering delayed after depolarisations at this site (right). (B) Corresponding polar map of the spatial localisation of arrhythmogenic and non-arrhythmogenic sites for the electroanatomical map in (A) (left) that can be translated to Imaging-based reconstructions to guide targeted sampling (Adapted from [49]).