BACKGROUND: Transition zones between healthy myocardium and scar form a spatially complex substrate that may give rise to reentrant ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). We sought to assess the utility of a novel machine learning approach for quantifying 3-dimensional spatial complexity of grayscale patterns on late gadolinium enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance images to predict VAs in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. METHODS: One hundred twenty-two consecutive ischemic cardiomyopathy patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% without prior history of VAs underwent late gadolinium enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance images. From raw grayscale data, we generated graphs encoding the 3-dimensional geometry of the left ventricle. A novel technique, adapted to these graphs, assessed global regularity of signal intensity patterns using Fourier-like analysis and generated a substrate spatial complexity profile for each patient. A machine learning statistical algorithm was employed to discern which substrate spatial complexity profiles correlated with VA events (appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator firings and arrhythmic sudden cardiac death) at 5 years of follow-up. From the statistical machine learning results, a complexity score ranging from 0 to 1 was calculated for each patient and tested using multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS: At 5 years of follow-up, 40 patients had VA events. The machine learning algorithm classified with 81% overall accuracy and correctly classified 86% of those without VAs. Overall negative predictive value was 91%. Average complexity score was significantly higher in patients with VA events versus those without (0.5±0.5 versus 0.1±0.2; P<0.0001) and was independently associated with VA events in a multivariable model (hazard ratio, 1.5 [1.2-2.0]; P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Substrate spatial complexity analysis of late gadolinium enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance images may be helpful in refining VA risk in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, particularly to identify low-risk patients who may not benefit from prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. Visual Overview: A visual overview is available for this article.
BACKGROUND: Transition zones between healthy myocardium and scar form a spatially complex substrate that may give rise to reentrant ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). We sought to assess the utility of a novel machine learning approach for quantifying 3-dimensional spatial complexity of grayscale patterns on late gadolinium enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance images to predict VAs in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. METHODS: One hundred twenty-two consecutive ischemic cardiomyopathypatients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% without prior history of VAs underwent late gadolinium enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance images. From raw grayscale data, we generated graphs encoding the 3-dimensional geometry of the left ventricle. A novel technique, adapted to these graphs, assessed global regularity of signal intensity patterns using Fourier-like analysis and generated a substrate spatial complexity profile for each patient. A machine learning statistical algorithm was employed to discern which substrate spatial complexity profiles correlated with VA events (appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator firings and arrhythmic sudden cardiac death) at 5 years of follow-up. From the statistical machine learning results, a complexity score ranging from 0 to 1 was calculated for each patient and tested using multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS: At 5 years of follow-up, 40 patients had VA events. The machine learning algorithm classified with 81% overall accuracy and correctly classified 86% of those without VAs. Overall negative predictive value was 91%. Average complexity score was significantly higher in patients with VA events versus those without (0.5±0.5 versus 0.1±0.2; P<0.0001) and was independently associated with VA events in a multivariable model (hazard ratio, 1.5 [1.2-2.0]; P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Substrate spatial complexity analysis of late gadolinium enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance images may be helpful in refining VA risk in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, particularly to identify low-risk patients who may not benefit from prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. Visual Overview: A visual overview is available for this article.
Entities:
Keywords:
cardiomyopathy; machine learning; magnetic resonance imaging; sudden cardiac death
Authors: Gregg W Stone; Harry P Selker; Holger Thiele; Manesh R Patel; James E Udelson; E Magnus Ohman; Akiko Maehara; Ingo Eitel; Christopher B Granger; Paul L Jenkins; Melissa Nichols; Ori Ben-Yehuda Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2016-04-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sana M Al-Khatib; William G Stevenson; Michael J Ackerman; William J Bryant; David J Callans; Anne B Curtis; Barbara J Deal; Timm Dickfeld; Michael E Field; Gregg C Fonarow; Anne M Gillis; Christopher B Granger; Stephen C Hammill; Mark A Hlatky; José A Joglar; G Neal Kay; Daniel D Matlock; Robert J Myerburg; Richard L Page Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-10-30 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: A J Moss; W J Hall; D S Cannom; J P Daubert; S L Higgins; H Klein; J H Levine; S Saksena; A L Waldo; D Wilber; M W Brown; M Heo Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-12-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Heidi L Estner; M Muz Zviman; Dan Herzka; Frank Miller; Valeria Castro; Saman Nazarian; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Yoav Dori; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Albert C Lardo; Henry R Halperin Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2011-07-26 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Glenn I Fishman; Sumeet S Chugh; John P Dimarco; Christine M Albert; Mark E Anderson; Robert O Bonow; Alfred E Buxton; Peng-Sheng Chen; Mark Estes; Xavier Jouven; Raymond Kwong; David A Lathrop; Alice M Mascette; Jeanne M Nerbonne; Brian O'Rourke; Richard L Page; Dan M Roden; David S Rosenbaum; Nona Sotoodehnia; Natalia A Trayanova; Zhi-Jie Zheng Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-11-30 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Hiroshi Ashikaga; Tetsuo Sasano; Jun Dong; M Muz Zviman; Robert Evers; Bruce Hopenfeld; Valeria Castro; Robert H Helm; Timm Dickfeld; Saman Nazarian; J Kevin Donahue; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; M Roselle Abraham; Eduardo Marbán; Albert C Lardo; Elliot R McVeigh; Henry R Halperin Journal: Circ Res Date: 2007-10-04 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Tarek Zghaib; Esra G Ipek; Rozann Hansford; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Ronald D Berger; Joseph E Marine; David D Spragg; Harikrishna Tandri; Stefan L Zimmerman; Henry Halperin; Scott Brancato; Hugh Calkins; Charles Henrikson; Saman Nazarian Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2018-01
Authors: Albert K Feeny; Mina K Chung; Anant Madabhushi; Zachi I Attia; Maja Cikes; Marjan Firouznia; Paul A Friedman; Matthew M Kalscheur; Suraj Kapa; Sanjiv M Narayan; Peter A Noseworthy; Rod S Passman; Marco V Perez; Nicholas S Peters; Jonathan P Piccini; Khaldoun G Tarakji; Suma A Thomas; Natalia A Trayanova; Mintu P Turakhia; Paul J Wang Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2020-07-06
Authors: Konstantinos N Aronis; David R Okada; Eric Xie; Usama A Daimee; Adityo Prakosa; Nisha A Gilotra; Katherine C Wu; Natalia Trayanova; Jonathan Chrispin Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2021-11-26 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Dan M Popescu; Julie K Shade; Changxin Lai; Konstantinos N Aronis; David Ouyang; M Vinayaga Moorthy; Nancy R Cook; Daniel C Lee; Alan Kadish; Christine M Albert; Katherine C Wu; Mauro Maggioni; Natalia A Trayanova Journal: Nat Cardiovasc Res Date: 2022-04-07
Authors: Katherine C Wu; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Julian Krebs; Tommaso Mansi; Hervé Delingette; Bin Lou; Joao A C Lima; Susumu Tao; Luisa A Ciuffo; Sanaz Norgard; Barbara Butcher; Wei H Lee; Ela Chamera; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Michael Stillabower; Joseph E Marine; Robert G Weiss; Gordon F Tomaselli; Henry Halperin Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-11-22 Impact factor: 4.996