Literature DB >> 29016731

Electrical coupling between ventricular myocytes and myofibroblasts in the infarcted mouse heart.

Michael Rubart1, Wen Tao1, Xiao-Long Lu1, Simon J Conway1, Sean P Reuter1, Shien-Fong Lin2, Mark H Soonpaa1,3.   

Abstract

AIMS: Recent studies have demonstrated electrotonic coupling between scar tissue and the surrounding myocardium in cryoinjured hearts. However, the electrical dynamics occurring at the myocyte-nonmyocyte interface in the fibrotic heart remain undefined. Here, we sought to develop an assay to interrogate the nonmyocyte cell type contributing to heterocellular coupling and to characterize, on a cellular scale, its voltage response in the infarct border zone of living hearts. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We used two-photon laser scanning microscopy in conjunction with a voltage-sensitive dye to record transmembrane voltage changes simultaneously from cardiomyocytes and adjoined nonmyocytes in Langendorff-perfused mouse hearts with healing myocardial infarction. Transgenic mice with cardiomyocyte-restricted expression of a green fluorescent reporter protein underwent permanent coronary artery ligation and their hearts were subjected to voltage imaging 7-10 days later. Reporter-negative cells, i.e. nonmyocytes, in the infarct border zone exhibited depolarizing transients at a 1:1 coupling ratio with action potentials recorded simultaneously from adjacent, reporter-positive ventricular myocytes. The electrotonic responses in the nonmyocytes exhibited slower rates of de- and repolarization compared to the action potential waveform of juxtaposed myocytes. Voltage imaging in infarcted hearts expressing a fluorescent reporter specifically in myofibroblasts revealed that the latter were electrically coupled to border zone myocytes. Their voltage transient properties were indistinguishable from those of nonmyocytes in hearts with cardiomyocyte-restricted reporter expression. The density of connexin43 expression at myofibroblast-cardiomyocyte junctions was ∼5% of that in the intercalated disc regions of paired ventricular myocytes in the remote, uninjured myocardium, whereas the ratio of connexin45 to connexin43 expression levels at heterocellular contacts was ∼1%.
CONCLUSION: Myofibroblasts contribute to the population of electrically coupled nonmyocytes in the infarct border zone. The slower kinetics of myofibroblast voltage responses may reflect low electrical conductivity across heterocellular junctions, in accordance with the paucity of connexin expression at myofibroblast-cardiomyocyte contacts. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2017. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29016731      PMCID: PMC6018934          DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvx163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Res        ISSN: 0008-6363            Impact factor:   10.787


  28 in total

1.  Modelling cardiac fibroblasts: interactions with myocytes and their impact on impulse propagation.

Authors:  Vincent Jacquemet; Craig S Henriquez
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.214

2.  Uniform action potential repolarization within the sarcolemma of in situ ventricular cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Guixue Bu; Heather Adams; Edward J Berbari; Michael Rubart
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Ephaptic conduction in a cardiac strand model with 3D electrodiffusion.

Authors:  Yoichiro Mori; Glenn I Fishman; Charles S Peskin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Electrotonic coupling between human atrial myocytes and fibroblasts alters myocyte excitability and repolarization.

Authors:  Mary M Maleckar; Joseph L Greenstein; Wayne R Giles; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  The effects of spherical aberration on multiphoton fluorescence excitation microscopy.

Authors:  P A Young; S G Clendenon; J M Byars; R S Decca; K W Dunn
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 1.758

6.  Mechanical coupling between myofibroblasts and cardiomyocytes slows electric conduction in fibrotic cell monolayers.

Authors:  Susan A Thompson; Craig R Copeland; Daniel H Reich; Leslie Tung
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  Fibrosis and cardiac arrhythmias.

Authors:  Sanne de Jong; Toon A B van Veen; Harold V M van Rijen; Jacques M T de Bakker
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.105

8.  Haematopoietic stem cells do not transdifferentiate into cardiac myocytes in myocardial infarcts.

Authors:  Charles E Murry; Mark H Soonpaa; Hans Reinecke; Hidehiro Nakajima; Hisako O Nakajima; Michael Rubart; Kishore B S Pasumarthi; Jitka Ismail Virag; Stephen H Bartelmez; Veronica Poppa; Gillian Bradford; Joshua D Dowell; David A Williams; Loren J Field
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-03-21       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Cardiac fibroblasts are essential for the adaptive response of the murine heart to pressure overload.

Authors:  Norifumi Takeda; Ichiro Manabe; Yuichi Uchino; Kosei Eguchi; Sahohime Matsumoto; Satoshi Nishimura; Takayuki Shindo; Motoaki Sano; Kinya Otsu; Paige Snider; Simon J Conway; Ryozo Nagai
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Electrotonic coupling of excitable and nonexcitable cells in the heart revealed by optogenetics.

Authors:  T Alexander Quinn; Patrizia Camelliti; Eva A Rog-Zielinska; Urszula Siedlecka; Tommaso Poggioli; Eileen T O'Toole; Thomas Knöpfel; Peter Kohl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  29 in total

1.  Electrical coupling between cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts: experimental testing of a challenging and important concept.

Authors:  Stanley Nattel
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 10.787

2.  Living myofibroblast-silicon composites for probing electrical coupling in cardiac systems.

Authors:  Menahem Y Rotenberg; Naomi Yamamoto; Erik N Schaumann; Laura Matino; Francesca Santoro; Bozhi Tian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  T-cell regulation of fibroblasts and cardiac fibrosis.

Authors:  Amy D Bradshaw; Kristine Y DeLeon-Pennell
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 11.583

Review 4.  The Extracellular Matrix in Ischemic and Nonischemic Heart Failure.

Authors:  Nikolaos G Frangogiannis
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Cardiomyocyte-myofibroblast contact dynamism is modulated by connexin-43.

Authors:  Francisca Schultz; Pamela Swiatlowska; Anita Alvarez-Laviada; Jose L Sanchez-Alonso; Qianqian Song; Antoine A F de Vries; Daniël A Pijnappels; Emily Ongstad; Vania M M Braga; Emilia Entcheva; Robert G Gourdie; Michele Miragoli; Julia Gorelik
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Initiation and entrainment of multicellular automaticity via diffusion limited extracellular domains.

Authors:  Steven Poelzing; Seth H Weinberg; James P Keener
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 7.  Electroimmunology and cardiac arrhythmia.

Authors:  Jana Grune; Masahiro Yamazoe; Matthias Nahrendorf
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 8.  Cardiac fibrosis.

Authors:  Nikolaos G Frangogiannis
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 10.787

9.  Percolation and tortuosity in heart-like cells.

Authors:  R Rabinovitch; Y Biton; D Braunstein; I Aviram; R Thieberger; A Rabinovitch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Heterogeneity and Remodeling of Ion Currents in Cultured Right Atrial Fibroblasts From Patients With Sinus Rhythm or Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Dorothee Jakob; Alexander Klesen; Elisa Darkow; Fabian A Kari; Friedhelm Beyersdorf; Peter Kohl; Ursula Ravens; Rémi Peyronnet
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.