Ingela Thylén1, Debra K Moser2, Anna Strömberg1, Rebecca A Dekker3, Misook L Chung3. 1. Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden Department of Cardiology, County Council of Östergötland, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. 2. College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, 527 CON, 751 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536-0232, USA University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, UK dmoser@uky.edu. 3. College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, 527 CON, 751 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536-0232, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: Although most implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients cope well, fears about receiving ICD shocks have been identified as a major determinant of psychological distress. The relationships among ICD-related concerns, receipt of defibrillating shocks, and symptoms of anxiety and depression have not yet been investigated. Our objective was to examine whether the relationship between receipt of defibrillating shocks and psychological distress was mediated by patients' concerns related to their ICD. METHODS AND RESULTS: All Swedish ICD-recipients were invited to this cross-sectional correlational study; 3067 completing the survey (55% response rate). Their mean age was 66 ± 11 years, and 80% were male. One-third (35%) had received defibrillating shocks, and 26% had high ICD-related concerns. Regression analyses demonstrated that having received at least one shock significantly predicted symptoms of anxiety and depression [odds ratio (OR) 1.58 and OR 3.04, respectively]. The association between receipt of shocks and psychologically distress was mediated by high ICD-related concerns which explained 68% of the relationship between shocks and symptoms of anxiety, and 54% of the relationship between shocks and symptoms of depression. CONCLUSION: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator-related concerns have a bigger impact on psychological distress than receipt of an actual shock. Assessing ICD-related concerns in clinical practice can identify patients at risk for psychological distress. Further research on assessment of, and interventions targeting, ICD-related concerns is warranted. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: Although most implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients cope well, fears about receiving ICD shocks have been identified as a major determinant of psychological distress. The relationships among ICD-related concerns, receipt of defibrillating shocks, and symptoms of anxiety and depression have not yet been investigated. Our objective was to examine whether the relationship between receipt of defibrillating shocks and psychological distress was mediated by patients' concerns related to their ICD. METHODS AND RESULTS: All Swedish ICD-recipients were invited to this cross-sectional correlational study; 3067 completing the survey (55% response rate). Their mean age was 66 ± 11 years, and 80% were male. One-third (35%) had received defibrillating shocks, and 26% had high ICD-related concerns. Regression analyses demonstrated that having received at least one shock significantly predicted symptoms of anxiety and depression [odds ratio (OR) 1.58 and OR 3.04, respectively]. The association between receipt of shocks and psychologically distress was mediated by high ICD-related concerns which explained 68% of the relationship between shocks and symptoms of anxiety, and 54% of the relationship between shocks and symptoms of depression. CONCLUSION: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator-related concerns have a bigger impact on psychological distress than receipt of an actual shock. Assessing ICD-related concerns in clinical practice can identify patients at risk for psychological distress. Further research on assessment of, and interventions targeting, ICD-related concerns is warranted. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Nikolaos Dagres; Tze-Fan Chao; Guilherme Fenelon; Luis Aguinaga; Daniel Benhayon; Emelia J Benjamin; T Jared Bunch; Lin Yee Chen; Shih-Ann Chen; Francisco Darrieux; Angelo de Paola; Laurent Fauchier; Andreas Goette; Jonathan Kalman; Lalit Kalra; Young-Hoon Kim; Deirdre A Lane; Gregory Y H Lip; Steven A Lubitz; Manlio F Márquez; Tatjana Potpara; Domingo Luis Pozzer; Jeremy N Ruskin; Irina Savelieva; Wee Siong Teo; Hung-Fat Tse; Atul Verma; Shu Zhang; Mina K Chung; William-Fernando Bautista-Vargas; Chern-En Chiang; Alejandro Cuesta; Gheorghe-Andrei Dan; David S Frankel; Yutao Guo; Robert Hatala; Young Soo Lee; Yuji Murakawa; Cara N Pellegrini; Claudio Pinho; David J Milan; Daniel P Morin; Elenir Nadalin; George Ntaios; Mukund A Prabhu; Marco Proietti; Lena Rivard; Mariana Valentino; Alena Shantsila Journal: J Arrhythm Date: 2018-03-23
Authors: Christos Zormpas; Kai G Kahl; Stephan Hohmann; Hanno Oswald; Christopher Stiel; Christian Veltmann; Johann Bauersachs; David Duncker Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 5.435