| Literature DB >> 33932588 |
Michele Orini1, Peter Taggart2, Anish Bhuva1, Neil Roberts3, Carmelo Di Salvo3, Martin Yates3, Sveeta Badiani3, Stefan Van Duijvenboden4, Guy Lloyd3, Andrew Smith3, Pier D Lambiase1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inhomogeneity of ventricular contraction is associated with sudden cardiac death, but the underlying mechanisms are unclear. Alterations in cardiac contraction impact electrophysiological parameters through mechanoelectric feedback. This has been shown to promote arrhythmias in experimental studies, but its effect in the in vivo human heart is unclear.Entities:
Keywords: Arrhythmia; Cardiac strain; Electromechanical coupling; Mechanoelectric feedback; Repolarization
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33932588 PMCID: PMC8353585 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.04.026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heart Rhythm ISSN: 1547-5271 Impact factor: 6.343
Figure 1A: Epicardial sock placed around a patient’s heart during surgery. (Adapted from Taggart et al.) B: Activation-recovery interval (ARI), a surrogate for action potential duration (APD), is measured from the unipolar electrogram (UEG) as the difference between activation (square) and repolarization (circle) times. C: Representative examples of unfiltered UEGs. D: Schematic showing longitudinal, transverse, and circumferential components of myocardial deformation. E: Fractional change in longitudinal and transverse segment length (strain) are illustrated for 2 cardiac segments (anterior base [red line] and anterior–mid myocardium [blue line]) along with intraventricular volume (solid gray line). Measurements were taken at end-systolic volume (dotted vertical line). Note that longitudinal strain values are negative, indicating relative shortening. AP = action potential.
Figure 2Effect of transient aortic occlusion on electrophysiological and myocardial deformation parameters in a representative patient. A: Unipolar electrograms with repolarization time markers (top)(red circles) and activation-recovery interval (ARI) (bottom) before, during (red), and after occlusion. B: Waveforms representing longitudinal strain in 6 left ventricular (LV) segments of the standardized American Heart Association (AHA) LV model during a single cardiac cycle before, during, and after occlusion. C: Changes in ARI during aortic clamp mapped over the heart sock geometry. D: Changes in longitudinal strain during aortic clamp mapped over the heart sock geometry. Stylized left anterior descending artery (LAD) and LV AHA segments are shown for orientation.
Global parameters of myocardial deformation and electrophysiology before (Pre) during (Occlusion), and after (Post) transient aortic occlusion
| Pre | Occlusion | Post | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean LV ARI ms | 255 (228–268) | 254 (230–269) | |
| SD of LV ARI (ms) | 16.0 (13.5–19.5) | 16.8 (13.7–18.4) | 17.0 (13.7–19.9) |
| Mean LV AT (ms) | 49.6 (43.1–52.5) | 49.7 (42.8–52.5) | 49.4 (43.1–53.5) |
| SD of LV AT (ms) | 22.2 (17.2–23.5) | 22.3 (17.4–23.4) | 22.2 (17.1–23.5) |
| Mean LV RT (ms) | 306 (288–315) | 305 (288–316) | |
| SD of LV RT (ms) | 21.8 (18.7–29.5) | 23.0 (18.4–29.5) | 22.7 (18.7–30.5) |
| EDV (mL) | 99.6 (89.5–135.1) | 110.0 (72.1–143.8) | 109.5 (94.0–131.1) |
| ESV (mL) | 48.8 (43.8–83.3) | 57.5 (46.2–92.5) | 56.4 (35.2–88.2) |
| LVEF (%) | 44.9 (41.5–51.6) | 47.8 (42.8–59.7) | |
| GLS (%) | –9.69 (–11.30 to 6.55) | –10.74 (–18.24 to 5.92) | |
| GCS (%) | –19.9 (–21.5 to 16.6) | –17.5 (–25.7 to 13.3) | |
| GRS (%) | 23.7 (14.4–27.3) | 18.4 (9.7–30.6) |
Values are given as median (1st–3rd quartile) across patients (n = 10). For each patient, mean and standard deviation (SD) of activation time (AT), repolarization time (RT), and activation recovery interval (ARI = RT-AT) were measured across all electrodes covering the left ventricle (LV). Values statistically different from preocclusion are shown in bold (∗P <.05; P <.01).
EDV = end-diastolic volume; ESV = end-systolic volume; GCS = global circumferential strain; GLS = global longitudinal strain; GRS = global radial strain; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction.
Figure 3Correlation between myocardial deformation and repolarization secondary to increase in ventricular loading for 5 patients. Each symbol represents a cardiac segment, and each marker type represents a patient (6 cardiac segments per patient). Changes in regional longitudinal shortening (ΔLS) correlated with changes in regional activation-recovery interval (ΔARI) and inversely correlated with changes in regional ARI dispersion (ΔARIsd).
Figure 4Translation of global mechanical dispersion into global electrophysiological dispersion. During increase in ventricular loading, changes in mechanical dispersion, measured as the standard deviation of time to peak longitudinal shortening (strain), correlated with global activation-recovery interval (ARI) dispersion, measured as the standard deviation of regional ARI. Each symbol represents a patient (n = 10). The correlation coefficient (r) is reported for each scatterplot.