| Literature DB >> 30649290 |
Daniel G León1, Mariña López-Yunta2, José Manuel Alfonso-Almazán1, Manuel Marina-Breysse1,3, Jorge G Quintanilla1,4,5, Javier Sánchez-González6, Carlos Galán-Arriola1,5, Francisco Castro-Núñez1, Juan José González-Ferrer4,5, Borja Ibáñez1,5,7, Julián Pérez-Villacastín4,5,8, Nicasio Pérez-Castellano4,5, Valentín Fuster1,9, José Jalife1,5,10, Mariano Vázquez2, Jazmín Aguado-Sierra2, David Filgueiras-Rama1,4,5.
Abstract
AIMS: Myocardial infarction (MI) alters cardiac fibre organization with unknown consequences on ventricular arrhythmia. We used diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of three-dimensional (3D) cardiac fibres and scar reconstructions to identify the main parameters associated with ventricular arrhythmia inducibility and ventricular tachycardia (VT) features after MI. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Arrhythmia stratification; Cardiac fibres; Diffusion tensor imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Myocardial infarction
Year: 2019 PMID: 30649290 PMCID: PMC6479517 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euy306
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Europace ISSN: 1099-5129 Impact factor: 5.214
Figure 6Fibre disorganization within the VT ROI. (A) ECG and VT activation map from one VT episode (P07). (B) Sample VT ROI generation (Pig07) used for further FDI comparisons among regions. (C) Left panel: FDI values within the VT ROIs show a high degree of disorganization. Right panel: tissue characterization within the VT ROIs. Ao, aorta; CL, cycle length; ECG, electrocardiogram; FDI, fibre disorganization index; LV, left ventricle; MA, mitral annulus; ROI, region of interest; RVOT, right ventricular outflow tract; TA, tricuspid annulus; VT, ventricular tachycardia.
Baseline data, scar and ventricular tachycardia characteristics
| VT inducible ( | Only VF inducible ( | Controls ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline data | |||
| Male gender, | 8 (100) | 4 (100) | 2 (66.67) |
| Weight prior to the VT study (kg) | 58 (53–62.25) | 61.25 (52–70.38) | 55 (52.75–56.5) |
| LVEF (%) | 33.95 (31.08–36.43) | 38.9 (33.3–43.63) | 52.3 (49.5–54.05) |
| T1 scar data | |||
| Heterogeneous scar volume (cm3) | 30.63 (24.73–49.03) | 25.77 (20.57–30.9) | |
| Dense scar volume (cm3) | 4.53 (3.45–6.39) | 6.08 (3.38–9.26) | |
| Total scar volume (cm3) | 39.03 (29.52–52.86) | 31.15 (23.25–40.16) | |
| VT features data | |||
| Different SMVT episodes | 2.5 (1.75–3.25) | ||
| SMVT cycle length (ms) | 213 (205–266) | ||
| SMVT similarity index (%) | 98.97 (98.71–99.19) | ||
| SMVT episode duration (s) | 132.56 (70.79–251.73) | ||
| Aggressiveness index (%) | 25.53 (13.98–38.50) | ||
| VTs CL dispersion per animal (%) | 3.3 (1.7–8.9) | ||
| VF inducibility data | |||
| VF aggressiveness index (%) | 87.06 (61.92–100) | 18.99 (12.97–32.91) | 100 (100–100) |
Continuous data are expressed as median with interquartile ranges and categorical data as n (%).
CL, cycle length; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; SMVT, sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia; VF, ventricular fibrillation; VT, ventricular tachycardia.