| Literature DB >> 34063360 |
Andrey Lisitsyn1, Anastasia Semenova1, Viktoria Nasonova1, Ekaterina Polishchuk2, Natalia Revutskaya1, Ivan Kozyrev1, Elena Kotenkova2.
Abstract
Natural biopolymers are an interesting resource for edible films production, as they are environmentally friendly packaging materials. The possibilities of the application of main animal proteins and natural polysaccharides are considered in the review, including the sources, structure, and limitations of usage. The main ways for overcoming the limitations caused by the physico-chemical properties of biopolymers are also discussed, including composites approaches, plasticizers, and the addition of crosslinking agents. Approaches for the production of biopolymer-based films and coatings are classified according to wet and dried processes and considered depending on biopolymer types. The methods for mechanical, physico-chemical, hydration, and uniformity estimation of edible films are reviewed.Entities:
Keywords: biopolymers; dry and wet processes; edible films and coatings; mechanical properties; microstructure crosslinking; permeability
Year: 2021 PMID: 34063360 PMCID: PMC8156411 DOI: 10.3390/polym13101592
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Schematic classification of biopolymer types [15,18,19]. Reproduced with permission from Popović, S.Z. et al., Biopolymers for Food Design; published by Elsevier Inc., 2018.
Figure 2Structure of amylose and amylopectin [30]. Reproduced from Kadokawa, Polymers; published by MDPI, Basel, Switzerland, 2012.
Figure 3Structure of cellulose [49]. Reproduced with permission from Trache, D. et al., International Journal of Biological Macromolecules; published by Elsevier Ltd., 2016.
Figure 4Chemical structure of polygalacturonic acid (a) and representative chemical structure of pectin, showing typical repeating groups (b) [72]. Reproduced with permission from Espitia, P.J.P. et al., Food Hydrocolloids; published by Elsevier Ltd., 2013.
Figure 5Chemical structure of chitin and chitosan [87]. Reproduced with permission from Rasul, R.M. et al., Carbohydrate Polymers; published by Elsevier Ltd., 2020.
Figure 6Structural formulas of monomers in alginate [97]. Reproduced from Parreidt, T.S. et al., Foods; published by MDPI, Basel, Switzerland, 2018.
Figure 7The schematic of the submicelle model of the casein micelle [117]. Reproduced with permission from Horne, D.S., Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science; published by Elsevier Ltd., 2005.
Figure 8The general structural features of collagen [135]. Reproduced from Sebald, A., proof-read/edited by Mitchell, D.A. Maxfacts; published by University of York, 2019.
Figure 9Chemical structure of gelatin [148]. Reproduced with permission from Kariduraganavar, M.Y., et al., Natural and Synthetic Biomedical Polymers; published by Elsevier Inc., 2014.
Figure 10Film formation methods of biopolymers.
Figure 11Casting method [186]. Reproduced with permission from Suhag, R., et al., Food Research International; published by Elsevier Ltd., 2020.
Figure 12Extrusion process [186]. Reproduced with permission from Suhag, R., et al., Food Research International; published by Elsevier Ltd., 2020.
Figure 13Coating methods.
Figure 14Dipping method [27]. Reproduced with permission from Mohamed, S.A.A., et al., Carbohydrate Polymer; published by Elsevier Ltd., 2020.
Figure 15Spraying method.
The main characteristics of packaging materials based on animal proteins and natural polysaccharides and ways of its improving, production and application.
| Advantages | Disadvantages | Approaches for Properties Improving | Recommended Film-forming Solution | Appropriate form and Ways of Production | Type of Packaged Food | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starch | ||||||
| Strong and flexible structure | Hydrophilicity | Plasticizers addition | Starch 2–4 wt %, | Films | Fruit, vegetables, berries, meat and some meat products | [ |
| Cellulose | ||||||
| High strength | Infusibility and insolubility | Surface chemical modifications (silylation, mercerization, peroxide, benzoylation, etc.) | Mainly used as reinforcing agent | Films | Fruits, berries and | [ |
| Pectins | ||||||
| Good oxygen, aroma, and lipid barriers | Hydrophilicity | Plasticizers addition (glycerol, acetylated monoglycerides, poly-ethylene glycol, and sucrose) | 1–3 wt % pectin, 45–50% of glycerol, 1–2% of calcium chloride | Coatings (mainly) | Fruits, berries and vegetables, | [ |
| Chitosan | ||||||
| Low oxygen and CO2 permeability | High water sensitivity | Addition of neutral lipids, fatty acids waxes and clay | 1–2% of chitosan (>90% DDA) in 1% acetic acid/malic/lactic/citric acid (mainly acetic acid), | Films | Fruits, berries and vegetables, | [ |
| Alginate | ||||||
| Structural stability | Hydrophilicity | Crosslinking (ionic, covalent, photo, enzymatic ) | 2.5–4% of alginate, 1–1.5% of calcium chloride, | Films | Fruits, berries and vegetables | [ |
| Casein | ||||||
| Low oxygen and carbon dioxide permeability | Brittleness | Cross-linking (formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, lactic acid, genipin, tannic acid, wax) | 1–10 wt % of casein, | Films | Fruits, berries, vegetables, and chees, fish, meat and meat product | [ |
| Collagen | ||||||
| Mechanical resistance | High sensitivity to moisture | Cross-linking (gluteraldehyde, carbodimide, transglutarninase, keratin, metal ions) | 3–8 wt % (0–10%) | Casings or films | Meat and meat product (especially casings for sausages) | [ |
| Gelatin | ||||||
| Good film-forming properties | Low strength | Cross-linking (genipin, transglutaminase, natural extracts, glutaraldehyde) | 2–5 wt % of gelatin, | Films | Various meat products, poultry, fish, vegetables and fruits | [ |
Examples of composites edible films.
| Biopolymers | Plasticizer | Crosslinking Agent | Changes in Properties | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starch | ||||
| Cassava and rice starch/maltodextrin/agar | Glycerin | - | High film forming ability for package molding, improved the mechanical and water barrier properties, decreased relaxation temperatures, improved water sensitivity. | [ |
| Potato starch/cellulose fibers from sunflower husk | Glycerin | Citric acid | Improved resistance towards stress and sufficient extensibility and high tensile strength, brittleness due to starch-cellulose interactions and decreased starch chain mobility, reinforced network and decreased in swelling. | [ |
| Tapioca starch/beeswax/propolis | Glycerin | - | Lower values of water vapor permeability and water solubility; decreased in the moisture content and vapor water permeability. | [ |
| Rice starch/cellulose fiber mesocarp | - | - | Enhanced thermal stability and lowered water uptake | [ |
| Rice starch/cellulose | Glycerin/sorbitol | - | Reinforced mechanically the films (higher tensile strength) and reduced water vapor permeabilities | [ |
| Pea starch/CMC and pea starch/MC | Glycerin | - | Improved the storage modulus and the glass transition temperature, increased the tensile stress, elongation at break and the barrier of water vapor; MC increased the thermalstability, while CMC decreased the thermal stability. | [ |
| Turmeric starch/gelatin | Glycerin | Gelatin increased flexibility and elongation at break | [ | |
| Cellulose and derivatives | ||||
| Wood cellulose/sodium alginate | - | Calcium chloride | Increased the mechanical properties (tensile), improved grease barrier properties and reduced water vapor permeability | [ |
| Cellulose/collagen hydrolysate | - | - | Exhibited good transparence and the capacity for ultraviolet radiation absorption, improved the mechanical properties and enhanced the stability in distilled water. | [ |
| Cellulose/chitosan | - | - | High transparent property, excellent barrier properties against oxygen and antimicrobial properties. | [ |
| Pectin | ||||
| Fruit and vegetable wastes (fruit and vegetable flour) | - | - | Decreased solubility (50%) and improved of the mechanical properties (decrease of elongation and increase of tensile strength) | [ |
| Citrus pectin/sodium alginate | Polyglycerin | Zinc chloride | Improved the strength of crosslinking network, improved mechanical performance. | [ |
| Papaya puree/alginate | Glycerin | Calcium chloride/citric acid | Improved puncture strength | [ |
| Pectin/protein phaseolin | - | Microbial transglutaminase | Mechanical properties and barrier properties to CO2, O2 and water vapor was comparable to commercial plastics. | [ |
| Chitosan | ||||
| Chitosan/collagen | Glycerin | - | Displayed higher elongation at break point, but lower tensile strength and modulus of elasticity, increased water vapor permeability, decreased transparency | [ |
| Quaternized chitosan/CMC | - | - | Improved tensile properties, thermostability, oxygen permeability values, and water resistance | [ |
| Alginate | ||||
| Alginate/pectin | Glycerin | Calcium chloride | Continuous, homogenous and transparent films, chemical composition influenced on color, water vapor permeability, tensile strength, elongation at break | [ |
| Alginate/gum | - | Calcium chloride | Improved the strength of network | [ |
| Alginate/cotton hydrolysate | Glycerin | - | Increased the barrier properties to visible light, did not affect the moisture content, biodegradability, solubility or oil barrier properties, increased the thickness and water vapor permeability | [ |
| Alginate/chitosan | Glycerin | Calcium chloride | Decreased water solubility, but increased film thickness, water vapor permeability and oxygen permeability, good barrier properties against ultraviolet light. | [ |
| Casein | ||||
| Lactic acid casein powder/carnauba or candelilla waxes | Sorbitol | - | Decreased water permeability | [ |
| Casein/cellulose microgel | - | - | Reduced the moisture absorption and the water vapor permeability, homogeneous and dense cross-sectional structure, increased the cleavage temperature, tensile strength and Young’s modulus | [ |
| Sodium caseinate/low-methoxylated pectin | - | - | Increased the stiffness of films (Young’s modulus) and decreased flexibility, decreased water content | [ |
| Collagen | ||||
| Fish skin collagen/chitosan | - | - | Lowered water solubility and lightness | [ |
| Cattle skin collagen/HPMC | PEG 1500 | - | Elevated thermal decomposition temperature and denaturation temperature, exhibited a more homogeneous and compact structure, improved tensile strength, ultimate elongation, hydrophilicity, stretch-ability and smoothness | [ |
| Collagen/galactomannan | Glycerin | - | Convenient values of wettability | [ |
| Gelatin | ||||
| Gelatin/chitosan | Glycerin | - | No significant difference in tensile strength, thickness and transparency | [ |
| Soy protein isolate/bovine bone gelatin | Glycerin | - | Increased tensile strength, elongation to break, elastic modulus and swelling property, more transparent, and easier to handle | [ |
| Whey protein isolate/gelatin/sodium alginate | Glycerin | - | Improved barrier to oxygen, water vapor and mechanical properties | [ |
| Fish gelatin/CMC | Glycerin/sorbitol | - | Increased tensile strength and Young’s modulus, decreased the elongation percent and equilibrium moisture | [ |
Figure 16Schematic of a sessile-drop contact angle system [526]. Reproduced with permission from Kwok, D.Y. and Neumann, A.W., Advances in Colloid and Interface Science; Elsevier Science B.V., 1999.
Figure 17Characteristics of the film structure determined by SEM.