| Literature DB >> 32021918 |
Pratiksha Singh1, Pankaj Baisthakur2, Omprakash S Yemul1.
Abstract
Plastic films for food wrapping, packing are widely used due to their special properties. These fossil fuel derived films are associated with long degradation time, toxicity and environmental pollution. Pineapple waste, sea weed can be very good renewable, alternative carbon sources to produce edible films. These edible films can be consumed by lower animals thereby overcoming the disposal problems of accumulating waste plastic and hence reducing pollution. In the present study, crosslinked polymers are prepared from pectin (P)/sodium alginate (SA) through crosslinking with bio-based acids such as citric acid (CA) and tartaric acid (TA). Pectin was extracted from waste pineapple shell and sodium alginate extracted from seaweed. The crosslinked films were characterized by using various analytical techniques such as FT-IR, thermogravimetry, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Mice feed study (testing of edibility), plant growth substrate and vermicomposting of these films was studied. Finally a suitable application of these newly prepared polymeric films has been evaluated as wrapping material on food products such as chocolate and Indian vegetable puff to enhance the shelf life of food.Entities:
Keywords: Citric acid; Crosslinked film; Food science; Materials science; Natural product chemistry; Organic chemistry; Pectin; Sodium alginate; Tartaric acid
Year: 2020 PMID: 32021918 PMCID: PMC6992982 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Scheme 1Synthesis scheme of cross-linking reaction between sodium alginate with citric acid (SACA) and tartaric acid (SATA).
Scheme 2Synthesis scheme of cross-linking reaction between pectin with citric acid (PCA) and tartaric acid (PTA).
Figure 1Comparative FT-IR spectra of SACA and SATA polymer film.
Chemical resistivity data of crosslinked polymer films.
| Solvents | SACA | SATA | PCA | PTA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acetone | - | - | - | - |
| 1 M NaOH | + | + | + | + |
| 1 M H2SO4 | + | + | + | + |
| Xylene | + | + | - | - |
| Castor oil | - | - | - | - |
| Methanol | - | - | - | - |
| Chloroform | - | - | - | - |
| DMSO | + | + | + | + |
| Distilled water | # | # | - | - |
Note: ‘+’ is Soluble, ‘-’ is Insoluble and ‘#’ is Swelling.
Mechanical analysis data of crosslinked films.
| Sample | Tensile strength (MPa) | Young's modulus (MPa) |
|---|---|---|
| SACA | 18.38 | 0.25 |
| SATA | 17.03 | 0.21 |
| PCA | 17.20 | 0.21 |
| PTA | 16.43 | 0.19 |
Figure 2Comparative thermogravimetric curves of cured SACA and PCA polymer film.
Thermal stability data of SACA and PCA polymer film.
| Sample Code | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SACA | 99.8 | 100 | 270 | 600 | 344.96 |
| PCA | 99.9 | 150 | 312 | 685 | 398.82 |
Tonset Temperature of as given by TGA.
Temperature of 5% weight loss as given by TGA.
Temperature of 30% weight loss as given by TGA.
Char temperature at 800 °C.
Integral procedure decomposition temperature.
Figure 3Antibacterial activity A: Test, +ve control (Streptomycin), -Ve control against E. coli. B: Test, +ve control (Streptomycin), -ve control against S. aureus.
Figure 4Comparative study of intestinal micro-flora of test organisms. Cage I: intestinal flora isolated from control mice and Cage II: intestinal flora isolated test mice.
Figure 5Crosslinked polymer as plant growth substrate photographs of comparative images of seed germination in a) control (in soil), and b) SACA, c) PCA polymer films from 0 day to 16 days.
Comparative Organoleptic test results before and after packaging for Indian veg. puff.
| Days | Sample | Colour | Flavour | Smell | Overall acceptability |
| 0–1 | SACA 1 | No change | No change | Good | Accepted |
| 1–2 | SACA 2 | Little change | Little change | Bad | not accepted |
| 3–4 | SACA 3 | Completely change | Completely change | Very bad | not accepted |
| 5–6 | SACA 4 | Completely change | Completely change | very bad | not accepted |
| 0–1 | SACA 1 | No change | No change | Good | Accepted |
| 1–2 | SACA 2 | No change | No change | Good | Accepted |
| 3–4 | SACA 3 | No change | No change | Good | Accepted |
| 5–6 | SACA 4 | Completely change | Completely change | very bad | not accepted |
Comparative Organoleptic test results before and after packaging for chocolate.
| Days | Sample | Colour | Flavour | Smell | Overall acceptability |
| 0–7 | PCA 1 | No change | No change | Good | Accepted |
| 8–14 | PCA 2 | Little change | Little change | Bad | not accepted |
| 15–21 | PCA 3 | Completely change | Completely change | Very bad | not accepted |
| 22–28 | PCA 4 | Completely change | Completely change | very bad | not accepted |
| 0–7 | PCA 1 | No change | No change | Good | Accepted |
| 8–14 | PCA 2 | No change | No change | Good | Accepted |
| 15–21 | PCA 3 | Little change | Little change | Bad | not accepted |
| 22–28 | PCA 4 | Completely change | Completely change | very bad | not accepted |