Literature DB >> 31352340

Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size of Membrane Hydrophones: Theory Versus Experiment.

Keith A Wear, Christian Baker, Piero Miloro.   

Abstract

It is important to know hydrophone frequency-dependent effective sensitive element size in order to account for spatial averaging artifacts in acoustic output measurements. Frequency-dependent effective sensitive element size may be obtained from hydrophone directivity measurements. Directivity was measured at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 10 MHz from ±60° in two orthogonal planes for eight membrane hydrophones with nominal geometrical sensitive element radii ( ag ) ranging from 100 to [Formula: see text]. The mean precision of directivity measurements (obtained from four repeated measurements at each frequency and angle) averaged over all frequencies, angles, and hydrophones was 5.8%. Frequency-dependent effective hydrophone sensitive element radii aeff(f) were estimated by fitting the theoretical directional response for a disk receiver to directivity measurements using the sensitive element radius ( a ) as an adjustable parameter. For the eight hydrophones in aggregate, the relative difference between effective and geometrical sensitive element radii, ( aeff - ag)/ag , was fit to C /( kag)n , where k = 2π/λ and λ = wavelength. The functional fit yielded C = 1.89 and n = 1.36 . The root mean square difference between the data and the model was 34%. It was shown that for a given value for ag , [Formula: see text] for membrane hydrophones far exceeds that for needle hydrophones at low frequencies (e.g., < 4 MHz when [Formula: see text]). This empirical model for [Formula: see text] provides information required for the compensation of spatial averaging artifacts in acoustic output measurements and is useful for choosing an appropriate sensitive element size for a given experiment.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31352340      PMCID: PMC6948014          DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2019.2930042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  26 in total

1.  Hydrophone spatial averaging corrections from 1 to 40 MHz.

Authors:  E G Radulescu; P A Lewin; A Goldstein; A Nowicki
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Hydrophones' effective diameter measurements as a quasi-continuous function of frequency.

Authors:  E G Radulescu; P A Lewin; A Nowicki; W A Berger
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  Broadband PVDF membrane hydrophone for comparisons of hydrophone calibration methods up to 140 MHz.

Authors:  Volker Wilkens; Walter Molkenstruck
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Characterization of a polymer film optical fiber hydrophone for use in the range 1 to 20 MHz: a comparison with PVDF needle and membrane hydrophones.

Authors:  P C Beard; A M Hurrell; T N Mills
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part II: Experimental Validation of Spatial Averaging Model.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Yunbo Liu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  A multiple-frequency hydrophone calibration technique.

Authors:  R A Smith; D R Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Investigation of the repeatability and reproducibility of hydrophone measurements of medical ultrasound fields.

Authors:  Eleanor Martin; Bradley Treeby
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Evaluation of uncertainty for regularized deconvolution: A case study in hydrophone measurements.

Authors:  S Eichstädt; V Wilkens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Membrane hydrophone measurement and numerical simulation of HIFU fields up to developed shock regimes.

Authors:  Olga V Bessonova; Volker Wilkens
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  A Method for Measuring the Directional Response of Ultrasound Receivers in the Range 0.3-80 MHz Using a Laser-Generated Ultrasound Source.

Authors:  James A Guggenheim; Edward Z Zhang; Paul C Beard
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 2.725

View more
  8 in total

1.  Correction for Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for Circular Sources.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Anant Shah; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part II: Validation for ARFI and Pulsed Doppler Waveforms.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Anant Shah; Aoife M Ivory; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part I: Theory and Impact on Diagnostic Safety Indexes.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Correction for Spatial Averaging Artifacts in Hydrophone Measurements of High-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound: An Inverse Filter Approach.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Samuel M Howard
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for ARFI Beams from Array Transducers.

Authors:  Keith Wear; Anant Shah; Aoife M Ivory; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Int Ultrason Symp       Date:  2020

6.  Correction for Spatial Averaging Artifacts for Circularly-Symmetric Pressure Beams Measured with Membrane Hydrophones.

Authors:  Keith Wear; Anant Shah; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Int Ultrason Symp       Date:  2020

7.  Spatiotemporal Deconvolution of Hydrophone Response for Linear and Nonlinear Beams-Part I: Theory, Spatial-Averaging Correction Formulas, and Criteria for Sensitive Element Size.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Spatiotemporal Deconvolution of Hydrophone Response for Linear and Nonlinear Beams-Part II: Experimental Validation.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Anant Shah; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.267

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.