Literature DB >> 30530327

Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part II: Experimental Validation of Spatial Averaging Model.

Keith A Wear, Yunbo Liu.   

Abstract

Acoustic pressure can be measured with a hydrophone. Hydrophone measurements can underestimate incident acoustic pressure due to spatial averaging effects across the hydrophone sensitive element. The spatial averaging filter for a nonlinear focused beam is a low-pass filter that decreases monotonically from 1 to 0 as frequency increases from 0 to infinity. Experiments were performed to test an analytic model for the spatial averaging filter. Nonlinear pressure tone bursts were generated by three source transducers with driving frequencies ranging from 2.5 to 6 MHz, diameters ranging from 19 to 64 mm, and focal lengths ranging from 38 to 89 mm. The nonlinear pressure fields were measured using four needle hydrophones with nominal geometrical sensitive element diameters of 200, 400, 600, and [Formula: see text]. The average root-mean-square difference between theoretical and experimental spatial averaging filters was 5.8% ± 2.6%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30530327      PMCID: PMC6935506          DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2018.2886071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  34 in total

1.  Hydrophone spatial averaging corrections from 1 to 40 MHz.

Authors:  E G Radulescu; P A Lewin; A Goldstein; A Nowicki
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  1-60 MHz measurements in focused acoustic fields using spatial averaging corrections.

Authors:  E G Radulescu; P A Lewin; A Nowicki
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  Hydrophones' effective diameter measurements as a quasi-continuous function of frequency.

Authors:  E G Radulescu; P A Lewin; A Nowicki; W A Berger
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  Cavitation clouds created by shock scattering from bubbles during histotripsy.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Tzu-Yin Wang; Charles A Cain; J Brian Fowlkes; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Michael R Bailey; Zhen Xu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Nonlinear propagation applied to the improvement of resolution in diagnostic medical ultrasound.

Authors:  B Ward; A C Baker; V F Humphrey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Correction for frequency-dependent hydrophone response to nonlinear pressure waves using complex deconvolution and rarefactional filtering: application with fiber optic hydrophones.

Authors:  Keith Wear; Yunbo Liu; Paul M Gammell; Subha Maruvada; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Finite-amplitude effects on ultrasound beam patterns in attenuating media.

Authors:  C R Reilly; K J Parker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Finite amplitude distortion of the pulsed fields used in diagnostic ultrasound.

Authors:  D R Bacon
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Characterization of a multi-element clinical HIFU system using acoustic holography and nonlinear modeling.

Authors:  Wayne Kreider; Petr V Yuldashev; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Navid Farr; Ari Partanen; Michael R Bailey; Vera A Khokhlova
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  Optimization of the ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening.

Authors:  Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 11.556

View more
  9 in total

1.  Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part I: Spatiotemporal Transfer Function and Graphical Guide.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size of Membrane Hydrophones: Theory Versus Experiment.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Christian Baker; Piero Miloro
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Correction for Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for Circular Sources.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Anant Shah; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part II: Validation for ARFI and Pulsed Doppler Waveforms.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Anant Shah; Aoife M Ivory; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part I: Theory and Impact on Diagnostic Safety Indexes.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Correction for Spatial Averaging Artifacts in Hydrophone Measurements of High-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound: An Inverse Filter Approach.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Samuel M Howard
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for ARFI Beams from Array Transducers.

Authors:  Keith Wear; Anant Shah; Aoife M Ivory; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Int Ultrason Symp       Date:  2020

8.  Correction for Spatial Averaging Artifacts for Circularly-Symmetric Pressure Beams Measured with Membrane Hydrophones.

Authors:  Keith Wear; Anant Shah; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Int Ultrason Symp       Date:  2020

9.  Spatiotemporal Deconvolution of Hydrophone Response for Linear and Nonlinear Beams-Part I: Theory, Spatial-Averaging Correction Formulas, and Criteria for Sensitive Element Size.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.267

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.