Literature DB >> 31247548

Correction for Spatial Averaging Artifacts in Hydrophone Measurements of High-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound: An Inverse Filter Approach.

Keith A Wear, Samuel M Howard.   

Abstract

High-intensity therapeutic ultrasound (HITU) pressure is often measured using a hydrophone. HITU pressure waves typically contain multiple harmonics due to nonlinear propagation. As harmonic frequency increases, harmonic beamwidth decreases. For sufficiently high harmonic frequency, beamwidth may become comparable to the hydrophone effective sensitive element diameter, resulting in signal reduction due to spatial averaging. An analytic formula for a hydrophone spatial averaging filter for beams with Gaussian harmonic radial profiles was tested on HITU pressure signals generated by three transducers (1.45 MHz, F/1; 1.53 MHz, F/1.5; 3.91 MHz, F/1) with focal pressures up to 48 MPa. The HITU signals were measured using fiber-optic and needle hydrophones (nominal geometrical sensitive element diameters: 100 and [Formula: see text]). Harmonic radial profiles were measured with transverse scans in the focal plane using the fiber-optic hydrophone. Harmonic radial profiles were accurately approximated by Gaussian functions with root-mean-square (rms) differences between transverse scans and Gaussian fits less than 9% for frequencies up to approximately 50 MHz. The Gaussian harmonic beamwidth parameter σn varied with harmonic number n according to a power law, σn = σ1/nq where . RMS differences between experimental and theoretical spatial averaging filters were 11% ± 1% (1.45 MHz), 8% ± 1% (1.53 MHz), and 4% ± 1% (3.91 MHz). For the two more highly focused (F/1) transducers, the effect of spatial averaging was to underestimate peak compressional pressure (pcp), peak rarefactional pressure (prp), and pulse intensity integral (pii) by (mean ± standard deviation) (pcp: 4.9% ± 0.5%, prp: 0.4% ± 0.2%, pii: 2.9% ± 1%) and (pcp: 28.3% ± 9.6%, prp: 6% ± 2.4%, pii: 24.3% ± 6.7%) for the 100- and 400- [Formula: see text]-diameter hydrophones, respectively. These errors can be suppressed by the application of the inverse spatial averaging filter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31247548      PMCID: PMC6936621          DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2019.2924351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  78 in total

1.  Cavitation clouds created by shock scattering from bubbles during histotripsy.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Tzu-Yin Wang; Charles A Cain; J Brian Fowlkes; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Michael R Bailey; Zhen Xu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A Fabry-Perot fiber-optic ultrasonic hydrophone for the simultaneous measurement of temperature and acoustic pressure.

Authors:  Paul Morris; Andrew Hurrell; Adam Shaw; Edward Zhang; Paul Beard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part II: Experimental Validation of Spatial Averaging Model.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Yunbo Liu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Nonlinear propagation applied to the improvement of resolution in diagnostic medical ultrasound.

Authors:  B Ward; A C Baker; V F Humphrey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effect of Frequency-Dependent Attenuation on Predicted Histotripsy Waveforms in Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Michael J Crowe; Jason L Raymond; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Finite-amplitude effects on ultrasound beam patterns in attenuating media.

Authors:  C R Reilly; K J Parker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Acoustic field characterization of a clinical magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound system inside the magnet bore.

Authors:  Satya V V N Kothapalli; Michael B Altman; Ari Partanen; Leighton Wan; H Michael Gach; William Straube; Dennis E Hallahan; Hong Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Miniaturized high-intensity focused ultrasound device in patients with glaucoma: a clinical pilot study.

Authors:  Florent Aptel; Thomas Charrel; Cyril Lafon; Fabrice Romano; Jean-Yves Chapelon; Esther Blumen-Ohana; Jean-Philippe Nordmann; Philippe Denis
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Finite amplitude distortion of the pulsed fields used in diagnostic ultrasound.

Authors:  D R Bacon
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 10.  Histotripsy methods in mechanical disintegration of tissue: towards clinical applications.

Authors:  Vera A Khokhlova; J Brian Fowlkes; William W Roberts; George R Schade; Zhen Xu; Tatiana D Khokhlova; Timothy L Hall; Adam D Maxwell; Yak-Nam Wang; Charles A Cain
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.914

View more
  8 in total

1.  Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size of Membrane Hydrophones: Theory Versus Experiment.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Christian Baker; Piero Miloro
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Correction for Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for Circular Sources.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Anant Shah; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part II: Validation for ARFI and Pulsed Doppler Waveforms.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Anant Shah; Aoife M Ivory; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part I: Theory and Impact on Diagnostic Safety Indexes.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for ARFI Beams from Array Transducers.

Authors:  Keith Wear; Anant Shah; Aoife M Ivory; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Int Ultrason Symp       Date:  2020

6.  Correction for Spatial Averaging Artifacts for Circularly-Symmetric Pressure Beams Measured with Membrane Hydrophones.

Authors:  Keith Wear; Anant Shah; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Int Ultrason Symp       Date:  2020

7.  Spatiotemporal Deconvolution of Hydrophone Response for Linear and Nonlinear Beams-Part I: Theory, Spatial-Averaging Correction Formulas, and Criteria for Sensitive Element Size.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Spatiotemporal Deconvolution of Hydrophone Response for Linear and Nonlinear Beams-Part II: Experimental Validation.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Anant Shah; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.267

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.