Literature DB >> 35733623

Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for ARFI Beams from Array Transducers.

Keith Wear1, Anant Shah2, Aoife M Ivory2, Christian Baker2.   

Abstract

This paper reports underestimation of peak compressional pressure (p c), peak rarefactional pressure (p r ), and pulse intensity integral (pii) due to hydrophone spatial averaging of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) beams generated by clinical linear and phased arrays. Although a method exists for correcting for hydrophone spatial averaging for circularly-symmetric beams, there is presently no analogous method for rectangularly-symmetric beams generated by linear and phased arrays. Consequently, pressure parameters (p c, p r , and pii) from clinical arrays are often not corrected for spatial averaging. This can lead to errors in Mechanical Index (MI) and Thermal Index (TI), which are derived from pressure measurements and are displayed in real-time during clinical ultrasound scans. ARFI beams were generated using three clinical linear array transducers. Output pressure waveforms for all three transducers were measured using five hydrophones with geometrical sensitive element sizes (dg) ranging from 85 to 1000 μm. Spatial averaging errors were found to increase with hydrophone sensitive element size. For example, if dg = 500 μm (typical membrane hydrophone), frequency = 2.25 MHz and F/# = 1.5, then average errors are approximately -20% (pc), -10% (pr), and -25% (pii). Therefore, due to hydrophone spatial averaging, typical membrane hydrophones can exhibit significant underestimation of ARFI pressure measurements, which likely compromises exposure safety indexes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acoustic output; acoustic radiation force impulse; exposimetry; hydrophone; membrane; shear wave elastography

Year:  2020        PMID: 35733623      PMCID: PMC9210502          DOI: 10.1109/ius46767.2020.9251717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Int Ultrason Symp        ISSN: 1948-5719


  22 in total

1.  Hydrophone spatial averaging corrections from 1 to 40 MHz.

Authors:  E G Radulescu; P A Lewin; A Goldstein; A Nowicki
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  1-60 MHz measurements in focused acoustic fields using spatial averaging corrections.

Authors:  E G Radulescu; P A Lewin; A Nowicki
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  Broadband PVDF membrane hydrophone for comparisons of hydrophone calibration methods up to 140 MHz.

Authors:  Volker Wilkens; Walter Molkenstruck
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Calibration of medical ultrasonic equipment-procedures and accuracy assessment.

Authors:  R C Preston; D R Bacon; R A Smith
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part I: Spatiotemporal Transfer Function and Graphical Guide.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part II: Experimental Validation of Spatial Averaging Model.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Yunbo Liu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Variation of High-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound (HITU) Pressure Field Characterization: Effects of Hydrophone Choice, Nonlinearity, Spatial Averaging and Complex Deconvolution.

Authors:  Yunbo Liu; Keith A Wear; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Correction for frequency-dependent hydrophone response to nonlinear pressure waves using complex deconvolution and rarefactional filtering: application with fiber optic hydrophones.

Authors:  Keith Wear; Yunbo Liu; Paul M Gammell; Subha Maruvada; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size of Membrane Hydrophones: Theory Versus Experiment.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Christian Baker; Piero Miloro
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  Investigation of the repeatability and reproducibility of hydrophone measurements of medical ultrasound fields.

Authors:  Eleanor Martin; Bradley Treeby
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.