Literature DB >> 35143394

Spatiotemporal Deconvolution of Hydrophone Response for Linear and Nonlinear Beams-Part II: Experimental Validation.

Keith A Wear, Anant Shah, Christian Baker.   

Abstract

This article reports experimental validation for spatiotemporal deconvolution methods and simple empirical formulas to correct pressure and beamwidth measurements for spatial averaging across a hydrophone sensitive element. The method was validated using linear and nonlinear beams transmitted by seven single-element spherically focusing transducers (2-10 MHz; F /#: 1-3) and measured with five hydrophones (sensitive element diameters dg : 85-1000 [Formula: see text]), resulting in 35 transducer/hydrophone combinations. Exponential functions, exp( -αx ), where x = dg /( λ1F /#) and λ1 is the fundamental wavelength, were used to model focal pressure ratios p'/p (where p' is the measured value subjected to spatial averaging and p is the true axial value that would be obtained with a hypothetical point hydrophone). Spatiotemporal deconvolution reduced α (followed by root mean squared difference between data and fit) from 0.29-0.30 (7%) to 0.01 (8%) (linear signals) and from 0.29-0.40 (8%) to 0.04 (14%) (nonlinear signals), indicating successful spatial averaging correction. Linear functions, Cx + 1, were used to model FWHM'/FWHM, where FWHM is full-width half-maximum. Spatiotemporal deconvolution reduced C from 9% (4%) to -0.6% (1%) (linear signals) and from 30% (10%) to 6% (5%) (nonlinear signals), indicating successful spatial averaging correction. Spatiotemporal deconvolution resulted in significant improvement in accuracy even when the hydrophone geometrical sensitive element diameter exceeded the beam FWHM. Responsible reporting of hydrophone-based pressure measurements should always acknowledge spatial averaging considerations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35143394      PMCID: PMC9136594          DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2022.3150179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   3.267


  55 in total

1.  Interlaboratory comparison of ultrasonic backscatter, attenuation, and speed measurements.

Authors:  E L Madsen; F Dong; G R Frank; B S Garra; K A Wear; T Wilson; J A Zagzebski; H L Miller; K K Shung; S H Wang; E J Feleppa; T Liu; W D O'Brien; K A Topp; N T Sanghvi; A V Zaitsev; T J Hall; J B Fowlkes; O D Kripfgans; J G Miller
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Experimental evaluation of indicators of nonlinearity for use in ultrasound transducer characterizations.

Authors:  Timothy A Bigelow; William D O'Brien
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Interlaboratory comparison of ultrasonic backscatter coefficient measurements from 2 to 9 MHz.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Timothy A Stiles; Gary R Frank; Ernest L Madsen; Francis Cheng; Ernest J Feleppa; Christopher S Hall; Beom Soo Kim; Paul Lee; William D O'Brien; Michael L Oelze; Balasundar I Raju; K Kirk Shung; Thaddeus A Wilson; Jian R Yuan
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Comprehensive backscattering characteristics analysis for quantitative ultrasound with an annular array: a basic study on homogeneous scattering phantom.

Authors:  Takeru Mizoguchi; Kazuki Tamura; Jonathan Mamou; Jeffrey A Ketterling; Kenji Yoshida; Tadashi Yamaguchi
Journal:  Jpn J Appl Phys (2008)       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 1.480

5.  Correspondence - Characterization of the effective performance of a high-frequency annular-array-based imaging system using anechoic-pipe phantoms.

Authors:  Erwan Filoux; Jonathan Mamou; Carmel M Moran; Stephen D Pye; Jeffrey A Ketterling
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Membrane hydrophone measurement and numerical simulation of HIFU fields up to developed shock regimes.

Authors:  Olga V Bessonova; Volker Wilkens
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Note to Physicians and Sonographers on Potential Underestimation of Acoustic Safety Indexes for Diagnostic Array Transducers.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Shahram Vaezy
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Pulse-encoded ultrasound imaging of the vitreous with an annular array.

Authors:  Ronald H Silverman; Jeffrey A Ketterling; Jonathan Mamou; Harriet O Lloyd; Erwan Filoux; D Jackson Coleman
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging       Date:  2011-09-08

9.  Correction for Spatial Averaging Artifacts in Hydrophone Measurements of High-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound: An Inverse Filter Approach.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Samuel M Howard
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  Spatiotemporal Deconvolution of Hydrophone Response for Linear and Nonlinear Beams-Part I: Theory, Spatial-Averaging Correction Formulas, and Criteria for Sensitive Element Size.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  1 in total

1.  Spatiotemporal Deconvolution of Hydrophone Response for Linear and Nonlinear Beams-Part I: Theory, Spatial-Averaging Correction Formulas, and Criteria for Sensitive Element Size.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.267

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.