Literature DB >> 27914414

Spatial attention in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Matthew J Goupell1, Alan Kan2, Ruth Y Litovsky2.   

Abstract

Cochlear-implant (CI) users have difficulty understanding speech in the presence of interfering sounds. This study was designed to determine if binaural unmasking of speech is limited by peripheral or central encoding. Speech was presented to bilateral CI listeners using their clinical processors; unprocessed or vocoded speech was presented to normal-hearing (NH) listeners. Performance was worst for all listener groups in conditions where both the target and interferer were presented monaurally or diotically (i.e., no spatial differences). Listeners demonstrated improved performance compared to the monaural and diotic conditions when the target and interferer were presented to opposite ears. However, only some CI listeners demonstrated improved performance if the target was in one ear and the interferer was presented diotically, and there was no change for the group on average. This is unlike the 12-dB benefit observed in the NH group when presented the CI simulation. The results suggest that CI users can direct attention to a target talker if the target and interferer are presented to opposite ears; however, larger binaural benefits are limited for more realistic listening configurations, likely due to the imprecise peripheral encoding of the two sounds.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27914414      PMCID: PMC5848865          DOI: 10.1121/1.4962378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  43 in total

1.  Temporal processing in the aging auditory system.

Authors:  A Strouse; D H Ashmead; R N Ohde; D W Grantham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effectiveness of spatial cues, prosody, and talker characteristics in selective attention.

Authors:  C J Darwin; R W Hukin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Studies on bilateral cochlear implants at the University of Wisconsin's Binaural Hearing and Speech Laboratory.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell; Shelly Godar; Tina Grieco-Calub; Gary L Jones; Soha N Garadat; Smita Agrawal; Alan Kan; Ann Todd; Christi Hess; Sara Misurelli
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Within-ear and across-ear interference in a cocktail-party listening task.

Authors:  Douglas S Brungart; Brian D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Contrasting benefits from contralateral implants and hearing aids in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Spatial release from masking in children with normal hearing and with bilateral cochlear implants: effect of interferer asymmetry.

Authors:  Sara M Misurelli; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Channel Interaction and Current Level Affect Across-Electrode Integration of Interaural Time Differences in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Katharina Egger; Piotr Majdak; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-16

8.  Speech recognition by bilateral cochlear implant users in a cocktail-party setting.

Authors:  Philipos C Loizou; Yi Hu; Ruth Litovsky; Gongqiang Yu; Robert Peters; Jennifer Lake; Peter Roland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Self-reported hearing difficulties, communication strategies and psychological general well-being (quality of life) in patients with acquired hearing impairment.

Authors:  Lillemor R M Hallberg; Ulrika Hallberg; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.033

10.  The effects of hearing impairment and aging on spatial processing.

Authors:  Helen Glyde; Sharon Cameron; Harvey Dillon; Louise Hickson; Mark Seeto
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  15 in total

1.  The effect of envelope modulations on binaural processing.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Stephen Fong; Olga Stakhovskaya
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Asymmetric temporal envelope encoding: Implications for within- and across-ear envelope comparison.

Authors:  Sean R Anderson; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Contralateral Interference Caused by Binaurally Presented Competing Speech in Adult Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Effects of rate and age in processing interaural time and level differences in normal-hearing and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Sean R Anderson; Kyle Easter; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effect of channel separation and interaural mismatch on fusion and lateralization in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Computed-Tomography Estimates of Interaural Mismatch in Insertion Depth and Scalar Location in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Jack H Noble; Sandeep A Phatak; Elizabeth Kolberg; Miranda Cleary; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Kenneth K Jensen; Michael Hoa; Hung Jeffrey Kim; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.619

7.  The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Corey A Stoelb; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Acoustic Hearing Can Interfere With Single-Sided Deafness Cochlear-Implant Speech Perception.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Kenneth Kragh Jensen; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Benefits of triple acoustic beamforming during speech-on-speech masking and sound localization for bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  David Yun; Todd R Jennings; Gerald Kidd; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The Temporal Limits Encoder as a Sound Coding Strategy for Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Qinglin Meng
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2020-11-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.