Literature DB >> 31472555

Effect of channel separation and interaural mismatch on fusion and lateralization in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Alan Kan1, Matthew J Goupell2, Ruth Y Litovsky1.   

Abstract

Bilateral cochlear implantation has provided access to some of the benefits of binaural hearing enjoyed by normal-hearing (NH) listeners. However, a gap in performance still exists between the two populations. Single-channel stimulation studies have shown that interaural place-of-stimulation mismatch (IPM) due to differences in implantation depth leads to decreased binaural fusion and lateralization of interaural time and level differences (ITDs and ILDs, respectively). While single-channel studies are informative, multi-channel stimulation is needed for good speech understanding with cochlear implants (CIs). Some multi-channel studies have shown that channel interaction due to current spread can affect ITD sensitivity. In this work, we studied the effect of IPM and channel spacing, along with their potential interaction, on binaural fusion and ITD/ILD lateralization. Experiments were conducted in adult NH listeners and CI listeners with a history of acoustic hearing. Results showed that IPM reduced the range of lateralization for ITDs but not ILDs. CI listeners were more likely to report a fused percept in the presence of IPM with multi-channel stimulation than NH listeners. However, no effect of channel spacing was found. These results suggest that IPM should be accounted for in clinical mapping practices in order to maximize bilateral CI benefits.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31472555      PMCID: PMC6713556          DOI: 10.1121/1.5123464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  59 in total

1.  The coding of spatial location by single units in the lateral superior olive of the cat. I. Spatial receptive fields in azimuth.

Authors:  Daniel J Tollin; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea.

Authors:  B C Moore; M Huss; D A Vickers; B R Glasberg; J I Alcántara
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  2000-08

3.  Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Donald K Eddington; H Steven Colburn; William M Rabinowitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Listener weighting of cues for lateral angle: the duplex theory of sound localization revisited.

Authors:  Ewan A Macpherson; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel; Richard S Tyler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.

Authors:  Jill B Firszt; Laura K Holden; Margaret W Skinner; Emily A Tobey; Ann Peterson; Wolfgang Gaggl; Christina L Runge-Samuelson; P Ashley Wackym
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Place-pitch discrimination of single- versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users (L).

Authors:  Gail S Donaldson; Heather A Kreft; Leonid Litvak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effects of electrode design and configuration on channel interactions.

Authors:  Ginger S Stickney; Philipos C Loizou; Lakshmi N Mishra; Peter F Assmann; Robert V Shannon; Jane M Opie
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  The surprising performance of present-day cochlear implants.

Authors:  Blake S Wilson; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  D Wesley Grantham; Daniel H Ashmead; Todd A Ricketts; Robert F Labadie; David S Haynes
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  8 in total

1.  Computed-Tomography Estimates of Interaural Mismatch in Insertion Depth and Scalar Location in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Jack H Noble; Sandeep A Phatak; Elizabeth Kolberg; Miranda Cleary; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Kenneth K Jensen; Michael Hoa; Hung Jeffrey Kim; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.619

2.  Longitudinal auditory data of children with prelingual single-sided deafness managed with early cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Tine Arras; An Boudewyns; Freya Swinnen; Andrzej Zarowski; Birgit Philips; Christian Desloovere; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Benefits of triple acoustic beamforming during speech-on-speech masking and sound localization for bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  David Yun; Todd R Jennings; Gerald Kidd; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effectiveness of Place-based Mapping in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Devices.

Authors:  Margaret T Dillon; Michael W Canfarotta; Emily Buss; Joseph Hopfinger; Brendan P O'Connell
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  The Temporal Limits Encoder as a Sound Coding Strategy for Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Qinglin Meng
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2020-11-20

6.  A Comparison of Place-Pitch-Based Interaural Electrode Matching Methods for Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Kenneth K Jensen; Stefano Cosentino; Joshua G W Bernstein; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 7.  Electro-Haptic Stimulation: A New Approach for Improving Cochlear-Implant Listening.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Carl A Verschuur
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Spatial Release From Masking in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients With Single-Sided Deafness.

Authors:  Lisa R Park; Margaret T Dillon; Emily Buss; Brendan P O'Connell; Kevin D Brown
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 1.636

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.