Literature DB >> 33409339

The Temporal Limits Encoder as a Sound Coding Strategy for Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Alan Kan1, Qinglin Meng2.   

Abstract

The difference in binaural benefit between bilateral cochlear implant (CI) users and normal hearing (NH) listeners has typically been attributed to CI sound coding strategies not encoding the acoustic fine structure (FS) interaural time differences (ITD). The Temporal Limits Encoder (TLE) strategy is proposed as a potential way of improving binaural hearing benefits for CI users in noisy situations. TLE works by downward-transposition of mid-frequency band-limited channel information and can theoretically provide FS-ITD cues. In this work, the effect of choice of lower limit of the modulator in TLE was examined by measuring performance on a word recognition task and computing the magnitude of binaural benefit in bilateral CI users. Performance listening with the TLE strategy was compared with the commonly used Advanced Combinational Encoder (ACE) CI sound coding strategy. Results showed that setting the lower limit to ≥200 Hz maintained word recognition performance comparable to that of ACE. While most CI listeners exhibited a large binaural benefit (≥6 dB) in at least one of the conditions tested, there was no systematic relationship between the lower limit of the modulator and performance. These results indicate that the TLE strategy has potential to improve binaural hearing abilities in CI users but further work is needed to understand how binaural benefit can be maximized.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assistive technology; auditory implant; bilateral cochlear implant; signal processing; sound coding strategy; speech processing

Year:  2020        PMID: 33409339      PMCID: PMC7781292          DOI: 10.1109/taslp.2020.3039601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process


  43 in total

1.  Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.

Authors:  Jill B Firszt; Laura K Holden; Margaret W Skinner; Emily A Tobey; Ann Peterson; Wolfgang Gaggl; Christina L Runge-Samuelson; P Ashley Wackym
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  CCi-MOBILE: Design and Evaluation of a Cochlear Implant and Hearing Aid Research Platform for Speech Scientists and Engineers.

Authors:  John H L Hansen; Hussnain Ali; Juliana N Saba; Charan M C Ram; Nursadul Mamun; Ria Ghosh; Avamarie Brueggeman
Journal:  IEEE EMBS Int Conf Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2019-09-12

Review 3.  MED-EL Cochlear implants: state of the art and a glimpse into the future.

Authors:  Ingeborg Hochmair; Peter Nopp; Claude Jolly; Marcus Schmidt; Hansjörg Schösser; Carolyn Garnham; Ilona Anderson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-12

4.  The surprising performance of present-day cochlear implants.

Authors:  Blake S Wilson; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Binaural jitter improves interaural time-difference sensitivity of cochlear implantees at high pulse rates.

Authors:  Bernhard Laback; Piotr Majdak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effect of channel separation and interaural mismatch on fusion and lateralization in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Design and evaluation of a personal digital assistant-based research platform for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Hussnain Ali; Arthur P Lobo; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Spatial hearing and speech intelligibility in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Aaron Parkinson; Jennifer Arcaroli
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Using transposition to improve consonant discrimination and detection for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss.

Authors:  Joanna D Robinson; Thomas Baer; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Impact of Synchronized Cochlear Implant Sampling and Stimulation on Free-Field Spatial Hearing Outcomes: Comparing the ciPDA Research Processor to Clinical Processors.

Authors:  Stephen R Dennison; Heath G Jones; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.562

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.