Literature DB >> 31472559

Asymmetric temporal envelope encoding: Implications for within- and across-ear envelope comparison.

Sean R Anderson1, Alan Kan1, Ruth Y Litovsky1.   

Abstract

Separating sound sources in acoustic environments relies on making ongoing, highly accurate spectro-temporal comparisons. However, listeners with hearing impairment may have varying quality of temporal encoding within or across ears, which may limit the listeners' ability to make spectro-temporal comparisons between places-of-stimulation. In this study in normal hearing listeners, depth of amplitude modulation (AM) for sinusoidally amplitude modulated (SAM) tones was manipulated in an effort to reduce the coding of periodicity in the auditory nerve. The ability to judge differences in AM rates was studied for stimuli presented to different cochlear places-of-stimulation, within- or across-ears. It was hypothesized that if temporal encoding was poorer for one tone in a pair, then sensitivity to differences in AM rate of the pair would decrease. Results indicated that when the depth of AM was reduced from 50% to 20% for one SAM tone in a pair, sensitivity to differences in AM rate decreased. Sensitivity was greatest for AM rates near 90 Hz and depended upon the places-of-stimulation being compared. These results suggest that degraded temporal representations in the auditory nerve for one place-of-stimulation could lead to deficits comparing that temporal information with other places-of-stimulation.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31472559      PMCID: PMC7051005          DOI: 10.1121/1.5121423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  78 in total

1.  Auditory stream segregation on the basis of amplitude-modulation rate.

Authors:  Nicolas Grimault; Sid P Bacon; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Individual differences in source identification from synthesized impact sounds.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Ching-Ju Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Discrimination of interaural envelope correlation and its relation to binaural unmasking at high frequencies.

Authors:  L R Bernstein; C Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation.

Authors:  J T Rubinstein; B S Wilson; C C Finley; P J Abbas
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  The effects of frequency region and bandwidth on the temporal modulation transfer function.

Authors:  E A Strickland; N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Interaural envelope correlation change discrimination in bilateral cochlear implantees: effects of mismatch, centering, and onset of deafness.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Individual differences in auditory capabilities. I.

Authors:  D M Johnson; C S Watson; J K Jensen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Modeling the electrode-neuron interface of cochlear implants: effects of neural survival, electrode placement, and the partial tripolar configuration.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Steven M Bierer; Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Analysis of the human auditory nerve.

Authors:  H Spoendlin; A Schrott
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Henryk Skarzynski; Artur Lorens; Marek Polak; Colin L W Driscoll; Peter Roland; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effects of rate and age in processing interaural time and level differences in normal-hearing and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Sean R Anderson; Kyle Easter; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Sound source localization patterns and bilateral cochlear implants: Age at onset of deafness effects.

Authors:  Sean R Anderson; Rachael Jocewicz; Alan Kan; Jun Zhu; ShengLi Tzeng; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Binaural pitch fusion: Effects of sound level in listeners with normal hearing.

Authors:  Sean R Anderson; Bess Glickman; Yonghee Oh; Lina A J Reiss
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 3.208

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.