Literature DB >> 31154164

The effect of envelope modulations on binaural processing.

Matthew J Goupell1, Stephen Fong2, Olga Stakhovskaya2.   

Abstract

An experiment was performed with 10 young normal-hearing listeners that attempted to determine if envelope modulations affected binaural processing in bandlimited pulse trains. Listeners detected an interaurally out-of-phase carrier pulse train in the presence of different amplitude modulations. The peaks of the pulses were constant (called "flat" or F), followed envelope modulations from an interaurally correlated 50-Hz bandwidth noise (called CM), or followed modulations from an interaurally uncorrelated noise (called UM). The pulse rate was varied from 50 to 500 pulses per second (pps) and the center frequency (CF) was 4 or 8 kHz. It was hypothesized that CM would cause no change or an increase in performance compared to F; UM would cause a decrease because of the blurring of the binaural detection cue. There was a small but significant decrease from F to CM (inconsistent with the hypothesis) and a further decrease from CM to UM (consistent with the hypothesis). Critically, there was a significant envelope by rate interaction caused by a decrease from F to CM for the 200-300 pps rates. The data can be explained by a subject-based factor, where some listeners experienced interaural envelope decorrelation when the sound was encoded by the auditory system that reduced performance when the modulations were present. Since the decrease in performance between F and CM conditions was small, it seems that most young normal-hearing listeners have very similar encoding of modulated stimuli across the ears. This type of task, when further optimized, may be able to assess if hearing-impaired populations experience interaural decorrelation from encoding modulated stimuli and therefore could help better understand the limited spatial hearing in populations like cochlear-implant users.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binaural adaptation; Binaural hearing; Interaural time differences; Modulations

Year:  2019        PMID: 31154164      PMCID: PMC6571169          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  51 in total

1.  Lateralization of complex waveforms: effects of fine structure, amplitude, and duration.

Authors:  J M Nuetzel; E R Hafter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using "transposed stimuli".

Authors:  Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Sensitivity to interaural envelope correlation changes in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Interaural envelope correlation change discrimination in bilateral cochlear implantees: effects of mismatch, centering, and onset of deafness.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Spatial hearing benefits demonstrated with presentation of acoustic temporal fine structure cues in bilateral cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Tyler H Churchill; Alan Kan; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Release from masking for small spatial separations: Effects of age and hearing loss.

Authors:  Nirmal Kumar Srinivasan; Kasey M Jakien; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform.

Authors:  G A Studebaker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

8.  Coding of electric pulse trains presented through cochlear implants in the auditory midbrain of awake rabbit: comparison with anesthetized preparations.

Authors:  Yoojin Chung; Kenneth E Hancock; Sung-Il Nam; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Having Two Ears Facilitates the Perceptual Separation of Concurrent Talkers for Bilateral and Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implantees.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Matthew J Goupell; Gerald I Schuchman; Arnaldo L Rivera; Douglas S Brungart
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 10.  Use of Research Interfaces for Psychophysical Studies With Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell; Alan Kan; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  1 in total

1.  Interaural-time-difference thresholds for broad band-limited pulses are affected by relative bandwidth not temporal envelope sharpness.

Authors:  Paul G Mayo; Philip C Saunders; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  JASA Express Lett       Date:  2021-12-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.